Paatz has it right. The Conservatives are in for the next 5 years and a chunk of i was because of OUR support and OUR votes. We have to let them know that WE understand this and that so should THEY.
If they forget, we can remind them gently what happened to Avril Phaedra Campbell and her Red Tory cronies: it was US who destroyed them, to a very great extent.
We're not asking for gifts. All we want is our God-given (and Magna Charta-approved) RIGHT to the possession of our own LAWFULLY GAINED PROPERTY.
And we have to let them know that WE know that Property cannot be CRIMINAL; only the offensive USE of Property is criminal. Property itself is neutral in the eyes of the proper Law, being a 'mere chattel'.
Check out Volume 1 of Blackstone's "Commentaries on the Institutes of England" (1765 IIRC), which just happens to be (a) the best book on the Common Law ever printed, and (b) the basis of our legal system as well as the American legal system. Read espcialy the sections on "natural rghts of man" and the "rights of Parliament". The ownership of weapons is the underpinning right which guarantees all the others, according to the Lord Chief Justice of England. He also says that if Liberty be ever destroyed in this country, "it will be a Parliament which does it". Parliament, according to Blackstone, may only ENLARGE upon the existing Common Law.... but it may NOT contravene the Common Law, nor may Parliament LIMIT the Common Law RIGHTS which the people already enjoy.
I know somebody is gonna jump me on this, but kindly do so AFTER you have read it and understand what he is saying. And remember that just because Parliament may have broken the Law..... and what they have done becomes accepted...... if even one person objects to what has transpired, that person is RIGHT and the Law is WRONG.
WHERE is the public-spirited Lawyer who is willing to take this one to the Supreme Court, pro bono publico? Does he even exist?
But Paatz has the right idea: get it changed.
.