Epoxy7
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
put it right, its the right thing to do, period. If all you guys do is open the package and check for s/n its no wonder stuff like this slips through. but of course if you trust Sig blindly then you better stand behind your products, it really is that simple. You sponsors live on us here on gun nutz, making this man happy is called customer service. Thats why I bought once from one of you guys back east and now wouldn't buy anything, I go to my local store. I pay a bit more but you know what I do get? Service...Put this right .
I started to get into this and then decided not to. Before Questar's post (see mine above) I wrote a lot more. Now I think I should go back to what I originally had posted.
I'm far from a Questar "fanboy" or any other so called loyalist etc. Read my previous posts. When I don't think something is right I'm not afraid to say so. That being said in this case I had some serious red flags go up after reading Northlane1's post.
1) The damage looks like it's from a poor fitting holster or a bad storage system
2) 10 People I've shown the photo to haven't had the slightest difficulty seeing the problem with the finish. A person that knows they are right doesn't need the approval of others. This tells me something isn't being said or it's trying to be pushed as "others" agree so it must be right.
3)
Not likely. Someone that puts that much time to post on here, clearly considers it worth the bother. Which tells me we have a partial confession here or some knowledge of how the damage happened that hasn't been forthcoming. No one goes to that extent and then says they will pay to get it refinished if they received a damaged product straight from the store. This is like the child who is suspected of mischief, denies it, acts ticked off etc and there are no witnesses yet they offer to "help clean up". They did it.decided not worth the argument with them and just spend the $200.00 and get it refinished
4)
Some more red flags. Could be a mistake or oversight. If I received a damaged product I would say it was definitely a mistake or oversight not could be.Sending this pistol could be a mistake or oversight, that we all could make, denying that you could see the "problem" ,well thats what have the issue with
5)
So if you don't take his word for it, you're a Questar fan. Why would they "jump all over you" if what you were saying was completely correct? You don't think people who use Questar don't realize that mistakes do happen? Or is it just if we question anything about your posts that we should be labelled and dismissed?How many of the Questar fans that are going to jump all over me ,would accept this from a private sale CGN member as BNIB,or would sell this as BNIB to a CGN member,I am guessing ,none
6)
Another partial admission of guilt.For those that think that the marks are no big deal or its going to get marked up from use anyways,I agree,
7)
Irrelevant point meant to confuse the issue and somehow lend support that he's been wronged to such an extend that he's selling off the other one too. Misdirection.Also selling my other Sig on EE now that was purchased at the same time as this 226.
8)
Again so what. Other than maybe trying to say it's not a money issue, or that he doesn't believe it's a SIG quality issue.In the process of buying a new SIG 229-40 for my son on GunBroker .com
Bottom line, lots of issues with the post. Human nature goes against what has been posted.
Add in the actual emails from Questar and you even further support that this case doesn't seem right.