question about focus or paralax

Lets look at this from 2 angles. If the primary image is focused in front or behind the reticle, the image will not be in focus. In other words, if a scope is set parallax free at 100 yds, and your target is 300 yds, the image will be blurry. The reticle will be clear at any range provided the eyepiece is adjusted to the shooter's eye.

Try this by taking a scope with no parallax adjustment and focus on a quarter sized target at 300 yds. The image (e.g. the quarter) will be blurry. Now take a scope with parallax adjustment and try to focus on the quarter at the 100 yd setting-it will be blurry. Now adjust the parallax to 300 yds and that quarter will become razor sharp.

You will never see a long range shooter using a scope without parallax-targets will not be resolved.

Nice explanation , so much for using parallax as an excuse for missing a deer . ( no bashing intended) but people wiggle more than parallax will effect shots while hunting at reasonable ranges anyway
The reason there's no parallax on most if not all scopes under 9x is it's unnecessary
 
Not trying to use this as an excuse for not getting a shot off and no offence taken. I'm just trying to figure out why the target image was so blurry I couldn't see it and the reticle was sharp and clear. I don't want a repeat next year if I don't get the problem resolved
 
Not trying to use this as an excuse for not getting a shot off and no offence taken. I'm just trying to figure out why the target image was so blurry I couldn't see it and the reticle was sharp and clear. I don't want a repeat next year if I don't get the problem resolved

I will venture that if aiming at a deer and the image was blurry that your scope is broken - maybe the nitrogen seal is lost causing this blur. For all practical purposes, a scope without parallax adjustment is good to go on a deer sized target at extended range, say 500 yds.
 
The answers for parallax vs focus are good and IF you scope had those adjustments, learn to use them.

The OP scope doesn't so consider:

Very inexpensive package scope... not exactly known for quality optics and/or durability. But you have what you have for now so let's look at a solution.

For lower variables with NO parallax adjustment but with ocular adjustment, the compromise is this. Look at a target in the middle of the distances you are likely to engage at the highest mag of your scope... let's say it is 9X and that you are hunting out to say 250yds so the target is at 125yds.

Change the ocular focus until the image is in focus, THEN play with the focus to get the reticle as clear as possible. All of these scopes have a range of focus where you will move between image and/or reticle in focus. Try and find the best compromise where the image is clear enough to identify and engage and the reticle is clear/just blurry that you can use it.

Going further, the image should still stay clear enough to engage even if the reticle is a bit fuzzy. Prove to yourself the target can be hit by shooting.

I feel it is better to see the target and overlay a slightly blurry reticle then the other way around.

Now dial back on the mag and the image/reticle will both go into focus - at least more then good enough to get the job done. On the generic entry level 3-9, 5X or 6X is where the manf is likely to compromise on getting things to work. Dial down to 3X, you may get lucky and both stay in focus but likely one or the other is off. There is a very good chance, the edges of the field of view show distortion.

At 9X, the image should still stay clear ( as clear as this optic can provide) but sacrifice reticle sharpness.

It is a band aid solution but at least you are functional. You can fine tune this more by adjusting the ocular focus to favor the mag that you intend to use most of all. When I was starting out, I found 6X to be the most useful so made this the best view... either end was not ideal but functional.

If you have time, and if the scope has a fast focus ring at the back of the ocular piece, you can play with this like a parallax adjustment and find the best compromise of image and reticle when on target... the risk is that with cheap scopes, you can also get POI changes due to the image distortion. I never bothered for fear of causing other issues when all I needed to do was be able to aim behind the shoulder about 1/3 up from the brisket... close enough, good enough.

Getting better optics is certainly a good investment

Jerry
 
Exactly what I was looking for! Thank you! I'll play with it a bit for now but after the holiday rush is over I think I'll be looking into something with a bit more quality. This one has helped fill the freezer more than it's fair share and I think it's time to upgrade.

Thanks again to everyone for the help!
 
Back
Top Bottom