So I often get a question at the gun counter. Is model A worth the few bucks more than model B?
I tend to believe that pretty much every brand on the shelf today is "accurate" and built well enough (considering). Since when I handle them I can say that I like this feature on this one, or prefer the trigger or safety on that one, but in reality, in similar (price point) rifles, I don't really see why one is 100 bucks more than the other.
So I'm looking for some opinions here. I already assume that these all shoot "just fine", so not really looking for "I can shoot the eye out of a mouse at 200 yards", just looking for "value for money".
I have chose 4 models that fall into the 900-1200'ish retail range, so not your bargain basement or starter guns - the rifles that a guy/gal will come in looking at to "upgrade" to.
The current trend on the "want list" seems to be the black composite stocked, stainless rifles, so here is the contenders:
What my real question is - when Jack or Jill comes in and checks these over, what's the answer to "why is the Browning 300 bucks more than the Remington" - they look pretty much the same?
So what say you? What's the answer and how would you rate these four rifles in terms of "value for the money"?? Regardless of what you may "think" of a Rem 700 SPS is a Browning X-Bolt really 300 bucks "more gun" or is there a premium for the name built in there?
I tend to believe that pretty much every brand on the shelf today is "accurate" and built well enough (considering). Since when I handle them I can say that I like this feature on this one, or prefer the trigger or safety on that one, but in reality, in similar (price point) rifles, I don't really see why one is 100 bucks more than the other.
So I'm looking for some opinions here. I already assume that these all shoot "just fine", so not really looking for "I can shoot the eye out of a mouse at 200 yards", just looking for "value for money".
I have chose 4 models that fall into the 900-1200'ish retail range, so not your bargain basement or starter guns - the rifles that a guy/gal will come in looking at to "upgrade" to.
The current trend on the "want list" seems to be the black composite stocked, stainless rifles, so here is the contenders:
What my real question is - when Jack or Jill comes in and checks these over, what's the answer to "why is the Browning 300 bucks more than the Remington" - they look pretty much the same?
So what say you? What's the answer and how would you rate these four rifles in terms of "value for the money"?? Regardless of what you may "think" of a Rem 700 SPS is a Browning X-Bolt really 300 bucks "more gun" or is there a premium for the name built in there?




















































