RCMP Pistol Trials

The ones I have worked with in Sask all carried glock 22

Shawn

Provincial or federal? All fed agencies carry 9mm. Those guys must be provincial. I was referring to federal DFO (don't think any provincial guys are called DFO dept of fisheries and oceans?) and federal environmental officers.
 
Last edited:
DFO and environment still use 5946.

DFO had the 5946 before the RCMP and were having issues prior to RCMP adoption, but RCMP was married to S&W (for whatever reasons) so they still went ahead and adopted it. Its not a bad gun except for the horrible trigger, but its a heavy gun for everyday carry.
 
Provincial or federal? All fed agencies carry 9mm. Those guys must be provincial. I was referring to federal DFO (don't think any provincial guys are called DFO dept of fisheries and oceans?) and federal environmental officers.

It was defiantly DFO, I can not remember if the enviro guys were fed or not, it was a few years ago.

Shawn
 
Hate to admit it but the 5946 had pretty good reliability (although those used in IPSC did not seem to hold up well). That said, the P226 was more reliable...and ergonomic.

Rich
 
I think we dropped 1 of 2 armourers by switching from S&W revolvers to Glock 22 and the 1 remaining one wasn't very busy so he had more time to reload practice ammo on the Camdex!
 
I can not to this day understand the whole 'New York trigger'/ DAO mentality the RCMP has. I know the idea is a very deliberate trigger pull, prevent ND's yadayada; if an army private making less than 50k a year, who requires only grade ten, can be trusted with 6.5 lb triggers in AR's, then why cant the federal police force trust its well trained, highly paid, generally well educated officers with more suited trigger pull weights? Seriously, i feel that the torque put into someones hand to pul on a 14 pound trigger would be enough to throw a shot, especially on smaller stature personnel lacking grip strength. just my 2 cent opinion.


First off the soldier deploys in a combat zone as well as is..well a soldier...much less likely to be subject to lawsuits and other liability concerns.
Further despite the soldier being young, inexperienced and underpaid.....they are entirely focused, well trained, disciplined.

The average police officer these days pretty much considers the weapon a 4lb inconvenience on their hip and are not highly trained "shooters".
As well they operate entirely in an environment where liability is paramount and situations where an AD would be very problematic.
The other issue front and centre for police vs military is that a cop is entirely likely more to use there weapon to cover and or scan for threats rather than actually discharge it.

You are correct in observing that the DAO and heavy trigger approach is counterintuitive to making hits....problem is it is buffered by the liability and consequence of an AD...as well as the reality of the amount of and focus of training a cop will receive both initially and as continuing education/practice.

This is not a bash of cops.....but the reality of the recruitment pool, the mindset of policing and public perception as well as the fiscal restraint inhibiting training.
 
....Well, actually there is a small (single stack) version of the 5946 out there on issue, sometimes disparagingly referred to as"The Barbie Gun" not many admittedly...David K

The other argument against the 92 full size was that for those trying to be discreet, they had a choice - be discreet, or carry a gun, there's virtually no way to "plain clothes" a 92 .
 
Justin T personally picked the winner recently. :)
New Canadian version will be made of Balsa, to decrease weight and will be variable caliber, depending on rubber thickness.
Should greatly reduce lawsuit risks.
 
Now my question is, lefty 5946? Just swapping the mag catch over? Too lazy to go grab mine and see if it can be done.

Check the frame it needs to have the mag "cut out" on both sides of the frame. Cheers.
 
I find the choices by various law enforcement around the world to be interesting. Especially, if you look at the U.S. Where everything from 9 to 40 and even 45 is offered in just about any firearm, but Canada has lots of variety too between agencies.

Do other forces also use the 5946?

isnt the 5946 still listed as one of three pistols that NYPD can carry?
other than them i dont think anyone else uses the 5946.
 
Blackwatch, doh, totally forgot about DFO, our provincial guys carry G22s here in BC.
 
There were a few agencies using the 5946 but I think it's just the RCMP now.

The NYPD too (last I heard).

https://pistol-forum.com/showthread.php?17427-NYPD-and-the-Glock-17

http://nypost.com/2016/11/28/nypd-vets-upset-rookies-get-better-guns/
 
The other argument against the 92 full size was that for those trying to be discreet, they had a choice - be discreet, or carry a gun, there's virtually no way to "plain clothes" a 92 .
...Well ,yes and no......The 5946 can be carried discretely, and I've certainly seen larger guns carried in the 'States. It all comes down to the choices of holster,clothing worn, and the physical size of the Officer. There's always the option of a"Fanny Pack"or a shoulder type bag, or even a briefcase. So really the size of the weapon although something to consider is not the be all and end all when selecting a weapon for general issue.....Even an MP5, with the stock folded, can be carried discreetly beneath an overcoat, along with a radio, handgun and cuffs! ;)......David K
 
I alway thought the fact that it was difficult to mount a light on the 5946 was a drawback because I thought that was the direction law enforcement was heading. But I guess there are drawbacks to a light on a pistol like having to point your gun at anything you want illuminated or how it makes you a target.

When my dad was on ERT he was given a weapon light for his P226 but I don't know how common they were. The ERT guys also had their 5946's magazine disconnect safeties removed and they had a black finish.
 
Back
Top Bottom