What does "at least it's not a Savage mean"?
Just another Savage hater. Funny how these guys just keep there mouths shut when comparing targets at the gun range.
It really is. I would have liked a 700 but the QC concerned me.
My ex-army buddy who has a 700 tried my 469.00 Savage(.223) at 300 yards in the wind and was pretty impressed. I used cheap Barska glass but my .223 did not bad.
Unfortunately I could not get it to shoot like he made it, but he also took it off the table and bipod laid on the ground with a rolled up jacket/bag and told me to stop talking.
Hardly scientific but interesting group none the less from a day of casual shooting. My buddy liked the trigger which I set for around 2.5lbs. Unfortunately the heavy steel plate splattered the paper target so all I have is the group on the plate, the holes are loonie sized..
I think what people can't except is these are sub 500.00 rifles that shoot well. It really makes me wonder why people even bother comparing them to rifles costing 2, 3, or 4 times as much, no one is saying they perform as well as the high end rifles.
How many 783s or MVPs are used at those shoots?