ScottMisfits
CGN Regular
Now we disagree on two points.
1 - I'm not wrong, you are.
2 - Clearly your incompetence is not limited to computers. Since you are getting confrontational I will as well.
If I can put fourth a few simple and practical questions for you....
In the example I proposed above with a rifle canted so the scope is 1/2" to the left of the barrel. The elevation is adjusted perfectly at 100 yards. The windage is adjusted perfectly in zero wind at 300 yards. (300 yards being a reasonable practical max effective range for a 22LR)
Assuming the rifle is fired as intended with the same amount of cant that was used for zeroing...
What is the total possible windage error that could occur between the muzzle and 300 yards?
I'll help you out with the answer...
It's 1/2" at the muzzle
Its 2/3rds of 1/2" at 100 yards 0.333"
It's 1/3rd of 1/2" at 200 yards 0.166"
It's zero at 300 yards.
Could you shoot the difference if you where dumb and did not know that offset was there?
Could you shoot the difference if you were not dumb and did know the offset was there and made an effort to compensate for it?
Again, I know that you can account for this. The conversation was not if it mattered, it was if it was there. And now you have admitted it was there. If it didn't matter, why would the majority of accurate, long range shooters mount the scope plumb to the bore, and use either scope or action based levels to make sure the rifle and scope are level?
Thank you for proving my point for me.