Remember when! (check the price)

Duffy

Regular
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
49244.jpg
 
Pretty amazing isn't it?

I looked back at some catalogues from the 90's and almost fell over but the 99's were actually a little inflatted (or so I thought) at that time. I guess the machining costs were pretty high.

Now there has been some talk and even mention from Savage that a new 99 may be in the future. I think about it from time to time and if they came out with a new Savage 99 with a walnut stock (similiar to that of the classic 14 and 114 models) and a rotor mag what would I pay?

If they came out today I would fork over up to a grand for one, and even more if a deluxe version was available. Maybe chambered in a new round, 300 Savage Short Magnum (everyone else is doing it).

Oh to dream
 
$99.95 was a lot of money when that ad was published. The 'D' series was introduced in 1952. In Manitoba, for example, minimum wage for a man was 60 cents per hour in 1952. Can't find anything for AB. Except for later. AB's minimum wage went to a princely 95 cents per hour in 1965.
 
$99.95 was a lot of money when that ad was published. The 'D' series was introduced in 1952. In Manitoba, for example, minimum wage for a man was 60 cents per hour in 1952. Can't find anything for AB. Except for later. AB's minimum wage went to a princely 95 cents per hour in 1965.

According to the Bank of Canada Inflation Calculator, $99.95 in 1952 is equal to $827.25 in today's money.

http://www.bankofcanada.ca/en/rates/inflation_calc.html

Upon closer inspection that looks like a 1961 ad, which would mean $742.94 in today's money.
 
Considering what well used 99's go for in the EE, they would sell at those prices if they were available today.

Mark

I agree. I think they could give Browning's BLR a run at a similar price. I know I would take the 99 over the BLR. Especially if they had the rotary brass follower....:)
 
Back
Top Bottom