Remington 600, .350 Rem Mag Thoughts

shatterstate

New member
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Location
Edmonton
Just curious on everyone's thoughts on this caliber. Is it worth the cult following? I one mint at a gun show in Alberta with a $2200 asking price, seems steep.

Thanks!
 
The 350 Rem does have a small cult following. The 350 is a impressive chambering. But at $2200. bucks you would really have to be totally in love with Rem 600 rifles in the 350 chambering. In my opinion it is not worth the money asked.
 
I have had two Rem 600 series in .350 Rem Mag... love the cartridge... really did not like the rifle... I currently have two .350 RM's in M77 MKII rifles... right cartridge in the right rifle, I am very happy with these.
 
I've had a few , including a 600 . It's a great cartridge , but a bit of a nuclear facial in the 600 carbine . I would not pay 2200 bones for one . You'd be far better off with a Ruger M77 like hoytcanon' . I , technically , still own a Rem 700 ( early seventies ) in 350RM . It's perfect , my brother thinks so too , which is why he's been using for more years than I can remember and I can't pry it out of his hands . If your set on one , the Rugers do come up , they're cheaper and a lot easier to shoot well IMHO .
 
Thanks for the reply's. One of the main drawbacks seems to be the recoil and muzzle blast. I'm guessing because the the short barrel. I used one to down an elk at 120 yards in foot access only and had to pack it out on my back. Needless to say it was great being able to fit it in the side pouch of my pack without any struggle.
 
Thanks for the reply's. One of the main drawbacks seems to be the recoil and muzzle blast. I'm guessing because the the short barrel. I used one to down an elk at 120 yards in foot access only and had to pack it out on my back. Needless to say it was great being able to fit it in the side pouch of my pack without any struggle.

I did not mind the recoil or muzzle blast, even with heavy loads. What I disliked was the butt-heavy feel and "clubby" handling... the triggers were pretty sucky on both of mine too... the M77 MKII's are better rifles (subjectively) all around... including accuracy... and the M77 MKII's are a bargain at $900-$1000 in walnut/blued and $1000-$1200 for synthetic/stainless.
 
I am definitely going to look at the Ruger. I guess one of the main draws of the Rem 600 is it's a valued collector item.

Hoyt, do you still own a 600 or sell long ago?

Thanks!
 
Thanks for the reply's. One of the main drawbacks seems to be the recoil and muzzle blast. I'm guessing because the the short barrel. I used one to down an elk at 120 yards in foot access only and had to pack it out on my back. Needless to say it was great being able to fit it in the side pouch of my pack without any struggle.

Boy, that's alot of meat damage, I guess there's always a bright side.:p
 
Boy, that's alot of meat damage, I guess there's always a bright side.:p

The front shoulder was hamburger'd but I was planning turning that quarter into burger anyway lol. I hunt on the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains in Alberta in some thick Northern Boreal, so it's nice to carry a short carbine that will handle a grizz if needed.
 
The round is great! especially in a short throw 20" barrel! Dont do it - crazy price and for that model.

You can rebarrel any action you want and a stock for 2K or even less. Keep an eye on CGN, they come up now and then as well.

PM me for a build recommendation, happy to assist.
 
The round is great! especially in a short throw 20" barrel! Dont do it - crazy price and for that model.

You can rebarrel any action you want and a stock for 2K or even less. Keep an eye on CGN, they come up now and then as well.

PM me for a build recommendation, happy to assist.

Thanks for the info, i will definitely keep my eye out here for one.
 
If you like the the 600 find a 673 in 350. Better stock, action, barrel contour and the vent rib is metal instead of plastic. I like 600/660/Mohawks but I don't see $2000 value in one.
 
If you like the the 600 find a 673 in 350. Better stock, action, barrel contour and the vent rib is metal instead of plastic. I like 600/660/Mohawks but I don't see $2000 value in one.

I actually found a 660 on the weekend at a gun show with a $1250 price tag, dropped from $1695. I asked if he was firm and I got a dirty look lol. He also had a 673 going for $1525. I believe both have longer barrels than the 600?
 
I like the 660's more than the 600's but the 600's have a stronger cult following.
The 660 has a heavier barrel contour, no plastic rib, a blued bolt handle instead of chrome plated and a few other minor differences including barrel length (18.5" 600, 20" 660, 22" 673)
 
One of mine was the 600 and one was the 673... I preferred the 673 by a good bit, but not near as much as the Ruger.
 
Love the caliber, have a 350 in a 700 1969 bdl 700 1985 classic and 660. 600 is also a great little gun but not for $2000. For that money you should look for a model 7 from the Remington Custom Shop in 350 Rem Mag KS. Kevlar stock. Now that is a nice piece.

Hoyt that sounds like a nice set. But a better set is a set of 700 BDLs in both calibers made in 1969.
 
Back
Top Bottom