Sure. It’s soooo funny how real problems aren’t real problems when they don’t fit your agenda.
It’s even more funny that you consider the internet and YouTube as your experience.
Sure. It’s soooo funny how real problems aren’t real problems when they don’t fit your agenda.
Man every thread chuck steps into turns to garbage.
Let’s discuss the Walker Trigger.
I have had them work perfect down to two pounds. Had some guns I’ve purchased so dirty in the trigger that they were inconsistent.
Others had the non bedded actions screws so tight that the trigger was again inconsistent. Adjusting them down and adding inconsistencies could be dangerous. I’ve never had an AD in the field.
Strangely some of the new x marks are as good as any trigger out of the big R
A triggertech is a nice option if you need it really low.
Hello CGN,
I am looking to acquire as close to a "do it all" or an "all purpose" rifle as I can. I know there is no "one and done" rifle but something close is the goal. I think I have it narrowed down to the venerable Remington 700 chambered in the likewise tried and true 308. I looked at several other rifles over the 700 but this just seems to be such a solid, field proven rifle that I haven't found much else as universally recommended. Perhaps I missing something? As an aside, the 308 vs 30-06 debate has plenty of reading material available but if you really want to chime in on that subject here as well please feel free.
Basically, I am after a rifle that is durable and field proven. Deer hunting will be the primary function but the firearm should be capable of taking just about anything in North America. That said, there are not many polar or grizzly bears in my area but moose should be doable. I am not looking at huge shooting distances. The rifle will also see range time. I guess utility is the word I am looking for.
Long story short, over the years there have been a million variations of the 700 released. Again, utility, durability and ease of maintenance would be a bonus. I am thinking a used firearm will be preferred but new is not out of the question. Which sub-models would you recommend?
Thanks, CGN.
I get it R. You hate me, you hate my wife, you hate my kids. I get it. A simple post search of yours will show you following me around shooting off your mouth at me. Give it a rest.
I have owned a LOT of remingtons and still have a FEW ! Buck - Like you - I have never had a AD ever - BUT i have had a few triggers that were so GUMED up they were nearly unoperative and had some dangerous - BUT they had being PHUCKED with by Bubba the Gunsmith ! Discharge on bolt closing and discharge when safety set off ! Every Rem i obtain i checkout the trigger before using it ! So i have missed out on the AD 's ! I have lots of Timney triggers - Both reg and calvin elites - Trigger Tech triggers - HVR s etc - I really like trigger tech ! JMO rj
You can give it a rest as well.
Is there a way to set up a remote podcast? I would love to publicly debate some of these topics with a few of these forum members.
Maybe you need your own sub forum because even damn thread you take over with your BS.
I think that’s what most here are trying to do. I don’t hate the 700, but I prefer the Model 70. I like the original trigger (an acquaintance had an enclosed trigger freeze up yesterday on a big bull elk). I prefer the fire control system of the model 70, I prefer the flat bottom receiver and integral lug, and I prefer the non rotating claw extractor (although I have replaced all of mine with longer spring steel units).
Now to be fair, I have owned several left hand Model 70’s, and all but a handful needed work to be 100%. Rugers seems to have figured it out for factory reliability but the ones I’ve owned seemed to have been polished with a diamond tip chainsaw.