Remington 700R Milspec

I assume you mean a 24" plate at 1,000 yards? A decent factory rifle (such as the .308 Rem 700 5R) is not as accurate as a purpose-built target rifle, even if you do a good job and make very good ammo. So it is not realistic to expect to be able to hit a 24" plate at 1000 yards nearly all the time, with a factory rifle. However, if you do do everything right, it is reasonable to expect to be able to hit it more often that you miss it, which is enough to have a great deal of fun (and likely start you down a very expensive and very addictive road.... ;-)

For reference - the DCRA 1000-yard target has a 24" diameter 5-ring. A good shooter, with a good rifle, with good wind reading skills, in light or steady winds, can hit this nearly 100% of the time (but it's hard, and takes a lot of concentration!).

Yep, typo... 1,000 yards. I could throw a rock and hit a target at 100, hahaha! I definitely understand the advantages to a custom built rifle, but I've done enough reading and research over the past 5 years about this that I've learned I won't know what I want in a custom rifle until I start shooting at these distances. Maybe .308 isn't the round for me. Maybe I prefer a fixed power scope. Maybe I don't like it at all, lol! (I hope the last option is never the case...)

Excellent choice of calibre. Myself, I wouldn't call .308 factory match ammo "relatively cheap", but then again _I_ am pretty cheap ;-)

If you are going to handload, you might consider using Berger 185 LRBT bullets. The Sierra 175HPMK is a very good bullet (good performance for long range shooting, and quite "forgiving", in that it is easy to get a good accurate load worked out). The Berger 185 LRBT is the go-to default bullet for .308 F-Class shooting nowadays. It is a *very* high performance bullet (less wind drift), and is also an "easy" bullet to work with. It is pricier than the Sierra; if you can tolerate this, it is an all-round better choice than the Sierra.

Use good brass (Lapua is an excellent choice. Next best choice probably Winchester).

Don't fuss about fireforming your brass. It doesn't matter whether your brass is brand new, fireformed and neck-sized, or fireformed and full-length sized. It is pretty straightforward to load good 1000 yard ammo for a .308 - this is well-trod, well-known ground. Find out what all the good shooters are doing, and rip off their work. Nothin secret or magic about any of this.

.308 match is cheaper than .338 match is cheaper than .408 is all I was eluding to. For me it's the minimum for 1,000 yards and is one of the most tinkered with rounds in North America. I am on the same page with you about just finding load data and basically using others hard work to make my job easier. It's one of THE biggest reasons I chose .308. I won't be breaking new ground or trying to reinvent the wheel. Just wanna have fun and shoot, lol! The 5R is specifically rifled for 175gr bullets though. I'm not sure heavier would be advantageous or not... I have a line on a local supplier of BTHP 175gr Berger's and can get them at a VERY reasonable price in bulk. I could always try some 185gr's though just to see how they shoot.

Nothing at all wrong (!!!) with either of these scopes, in fact they are top-tier pieces of kit. I only recently tried out a Nightforce (12-42X IIRC) and I was *really* impressed with it.

If I were you, I'd put more into your rifle, even at the expense of putting less into your scope. There are a number of $700-$1200 scopes which are perfectly good to use, even though they are not as good as the Nightforces. To the extent that you'd be giving something up, it would be quite small, in comparison to the very large improvement you could make over a straight factory rifle. The single most important and useful upgrade you can make to a factory rifle is to put a good barrel on it (this might cost you on the order of $600-$700).

If a bit more $$$ needs to be put into the rifle I can squeeze the budget a bit. I don't want to sacrifice performance for savings even though I am definitely not in the "buying it for the brand name" market either. No kids, no wife, overseas income = a few extra bucks to spend all the time, ;)

On the one hand, Remington trigger are mass produced pieces of crap, in comparison to a $200-$300 custom trigger. On the other hand, and to Remington's credit, the triggers are adjustable and to be honest can be adjusted to be pretty clean and pretty darn shootable. I think it's quite an unsafe design, I would never use or trust the safety on a Remington, however that is absolutely no impediment to a target rifle or a plinker rifle.

Since you don't need to adjust your trigger to a very low pull weight (BTW you are correct in this), you can make out quite fine with a Remington factory trigger. Adjust the sear engagement so that it is _clean_ (which is far more important than being _light_). Make sure that the trigger is safe (verify that it won't fire if you close the bolt too firmly, etc).

I think I'll probably be alright with the trigger the more I hear about it. If it's 2-3lbs then I'll love it. A lof the rifles I shoot are in the 4lb+ range and I never have any problems so I'd imagine I'll feel spoiled with a 2-3lb'r, lol! I have a set trigger on my CZ-527 that I use to hunt with and tbh I dislike the lighter set... It just doesn't feel as clean to me and my groups end up opening up all over the map. I'm a subscriber to squeeze-surprise trigger control, but 1lb is just too light for me. A good break is more important than an early break imho. Sounds like if it's a dud trigger though I have options. Jewel, Timney, etc. Again, the reason I chose this rifle and the 700 SA platform.

If you like a mil-dot or ranging reticle, fill your boots by all means. But there's no need for anything fancy - get a reticle you like and that you can see, use your wind and elevation knobs, and/or holdover/holdoff, and you will be able to hit your target.

Personally I like a heavy reticle; I acknowledge that most target shooters prefer unusually light reticles. One thing I will say in favour of heavy(er) reticles is that if your reticle "disappears" or is difficult for you to see (especially against darker or irregular targets), you are giving up any and all supposed advantages of a finer reticle. Another thing I'll point out is that you are able to aim a reticle to a much finer degree of precision that the reticle itself.

I think the NP-2DD or NP-R1 are what I want. Will have to stare through each when I get back to Canada for a while to see what my eye prefers. Both are offered in illuminated which would help for lower light conditions... maybe.

There are a number of $400-class bipods made for F-Class. They are gorgeous and you might want to look at them. Having said that, one can get very good results from a $100-ish Harris or clone (suggestion: get the "swivel" version). There are only two bad things I have to say about the Harris style bipods, and neither of these is a showstopper. One is that they are a bit slow to adjust and set up (you have to get out of shooting position in order to alter the height). The other is that usually they "hop" when you shoot, requiring you to rebuild your position for each shot you fire. Having said that, a Harris bipod won't stand in the way of you shooting 10" groups at 1000 yards (many other things will... ;-)

F-class bipods... They are large and complicated, lol! However, something I want to achieve is to be able to watch the trace through the scope due to my spotter being too old to see that far... Is it worth it for me to do my due diligence and look into a much heavier bipod than a Harris to achieve that? "Hop" as you say is something I'm trying to defeat, again another reason I chose .308 over a heavier round, and I'd rather not spend to try and go spend again, lol... If I get a bipod and it's not doing the job it'll collect dust...

If you're shooting from a prone supported position, I think the answer to this is "No". The strongest rifle scope I've used has been 42X and it was great. If there is such as thing as "too much scope", I haven't seen it yet and I am still looking for it.

I've used as little as 15X - a $250 Weaver KT15, with which I shot a pretty spectacular 1000 yard score off my elbows; the target looked too small to hit but the 10s and Xs just kept coming up. Later I used this scope on a .308 to shoot F-Class pretty competitively at 300-600 yards (10 years ago; F-Class shooters and gear have gotten a *lot* better since then).

I've looked through a 10X scope at 1000 yards - didn't do any shooting with it but man did the target look *small*. Having said that, a good shooter can shoot pretty darn good scores with a 10X scope. And most of my 1000 yard shooting is done with only 1.5X magnification, and somehow I manage to hit the bullseye most of the time even though I can't even see it.

What about that insane March scope with a final power of x80??? That's craziness, lol! And much more than I want to spend. Good to hear more is better, especially to start with. As I improve on technique I'll try lower powers.

reloading dies - get good ones.

Get one of the good seaters with a micrometer adjustment. Redding is very good. Forster is just as good and is quite a bit cheaper.

If you get Lapua brass, you can get away with using a bushing neck die (e.g. Redding "S" type). Very quick and convenient (no need to lube or clean brass when you size; and Lapua is consistent enough that you don't need to turn necks). A Lee Collet die is a viable alternate - it's much yuckier to use but it does just as good a job.

You'll also need and want a full length sizing die or a body sizing die. If you have a neck die, all you need to complement it is a body die (no need to get a FL die).

To make good 1000 yard ammo, you'll need a chronograph (on instead of a chronograph, you can test your ammo at 1000 yards).

You won't need a chrono to make good 600y ammo.

Yes, loading kit is going to be a major investment. I do have a chrony and good one at that. The old man always need one for IPSC the last 35 years or so. I'm too lazy to hand load pistol calibers and just shoot factory stuff as I'm not trying to finish first place in 3 gun, lol! Just out to have some fun.

Thanks a bah-zillion for the detailed and full on response. It's chock full of info I need and is a MAJOR help for me to decide on some unanswered questions and also has made me think about a few things I didn't even know. Cheers!!!
 
Last edited:
.308 is a great choice for so many reasons. Some reasons not already mentioned:
- it is adequate for 1000y shooting, but it is not overkill.
- you'll learn more, faster, with a .308W than you will with a higher performance rifle.
- Your bullet will get blown around a lot. For a given amount of wind on any particular day, your bullet will be blown 1.3X-2.0X as much as various higher-performance cartridges.
- This sounds like a bad thing, but if you are trying to learn how to shoot, this is a good thing. Turn this around and you will see that the .308W is a more sensitive judge of your wind-reading errors.
- .308W is commonly used by very highly capable iron sight and scoped shooters. So if you are at a rifle match, you can compare how good your shooting is developing, compared to master-level shooters who are shooting comparable-capability equipment as you are. If your bullet is being blown 3' left and 3' right, and another shooter with a .308 is able to keep his bullet within 1.5' of centre, you *know* that that much improvement in your wind reading ability is *possible* (nobody said it would be easy on your ego or easy to improve your shooting though, sorry ;-).

What about that insane March scope with a final power of x80??? That's craziness, lol!

In fact I was specifically thinking about that scope when I wrote the above. Have never seen one or shot one, but I'd love to try it.

F-class bipods... They are large and complicated, lol!

True. By all means, get a Harris; even if you end up moving to an F-Class bipod, you'll always have a good use for a Harris BR-S bipod (the "BR" height model is the one you want for prone shooting).

It is quite hard to spot your own trace/swirl with a .308. Not impossible, but it's probably not realistic to plan on being able to do so, even with really good gear and really good shooting technique. You need/want to have a spotter do this for you. You may well find that a higher quality spotting scope is needed for your spotter - but wait and see on that.

If you're going to be in the Calgary area when you return home, contact the APRA (Alberta Provincial Rifle Association). Take up target shooting with them on their 900m range. In addition to whatever field shooting you are able to do on your own, you will learn more, faster, when you are shooting in a rifle competition. And you will have, for free, the advice of some very skilled long range shooters to draw upon.
 
Great thread KK.
Thanks Daniel, much to be learned from your words.

This may drift the topic a wee bit, but I've been seeing a pattern develop with HS Precision equipped HB 700's and 5R's.

Bedding.

Three of the four rifles I've recently tuned(all with aluminum bedding blocks), have required a skim bedding to reach their potential. The one that did not, a 5R, shot inside .4MOA with very minimal load development.
The others were MOA'ish, until properly bedded, whereapon they became 1/2 MOA shooters with tuned handloads.
This is in the field shooting, calm air, off the bipod with a rear bean bag ... not benchrested.

Just today, the Nephew showed up at the range with a sweet .308 700 HB 20 incher in a HS stock. On loosening and re-snugging the front guard screw, the barrel rose and fell 1/4" at the forend tip, the tang, it flexed maybe 10 thou.. Not good.
It was a 1 1/4MOA shooter. He did get one .535MOA 5 shot group with 46 Varget/155Amax though. After we bed it, no doubt she'll lob 'em into bugholes.

FWIW, Varget and 155 Amax have shot very well in every 700 I've ever played with. That bullet happily tolerates the substantial jump which long throated factory 700's demand.
These rifles also respond to straight, low runout handloads, as they make the jump across those long leades. Fliers/unexplained LR misses seem to rear thier ugly heads at much over two thou. TIR.
 
This is fun.
it's more a feeling of knowing you're on target than actually knowing it.
You've paid your dues. Well said.
That is just how it feels with irons at ridiculous distance. An art. With a side order of Zen.
What about that fancy new ATACR that NF just announced? 5-25x56 I believe...
But ... but .. it costs more than $500.
My spotter is 67, cranky and has 3 different pairs of glasses...
Oh my. How are his ears?.
Have you any familiarity with spotting bullet trace?. It'll surely jazz ya the first time a bullet in flight is observed arcing downrange. So cool.
Sometimes a thin white vapour trail, sometimes you'll see the bullet glinting in the sun, sometimes it's like a disturbance in the force field ... a boiling of the atmosphere.
Get 'ol cranky to ditch all 3 pairs of glasses, adjust the spotting's scope focus to his naked eye, set the focus at 3/4's of the distance to the target .... and the most important thing, get that spotting scope as close as possible to the rifles boreline. Hard against the shooter, just behind and just over his right shoulder works well. When you get it dialed, bullet flight will be as easy to follow as a tracer round is.
After some practice, one can usually call the hit/miss well before the projectile actually strikes.
 
.308 is a great choice for so many reasons. Some reasons not already mentioned:
- it is adequate for 1000y shooting, but it is not overkill.
- you'll learn more, faster, with a .308W than you will with a higher performance rifle.
- Your bullet will get blown around a lot. For a given amount of wind on any particular day, your bullet will be blown 1.3X-2.0X as much as various higher-performance cartridges.
- This sounds like a bad thing, but if you are trying to learn how to shoot, this is a good thing. Turn this around and you will see that the .308W is a more sensitive judge of your wind-reading errors.
- .308W is commonly used by very highly capable iron sight and scoped shooters. So if you are at a rifle match, you can compare how good your shooting is developing, compared to master-level shooters who are shooting comparable-capability equipment as you are. If your bullet is being blown 3' left and 3' right, and another shooter with a .308 is able to keep his bullet within 1.5' of centre, you *know* that that much improvement in your wind reading ability is *possible* (nobody said it would be easy on your ego or easy to improve your shooting though, sorry ;-).

^---- THIS. I agree with every word of it! I do NOT want to skip steps and merely learn that I can hit a target at 1000 yards if I spend enough money... I want to learn to shoot further to shoot better! I was raised with the mindset that nothing comes easy or free that is worth your time.

In fact I was specifically thinking about that scope when I wrote the above. Have never seen one or shot one, but I'd love to try it.

I've only read articles... Maybe someday I'll be interested in having something that uber, but for now it's way overkill, lol!

True. By all means, get a Harris; even if you end up moving to an F-Class bipod, you'll always have a good use for a Harris BR-S bipod (the "BR" height model is the one you want for prone shooting).

It is quite hard to spot your own trace/swirl with a .308. Not impossible, but it's probably not realistic to plan on being able to do so, even with really good gear and really good shooting technique. You need/want to have a spotter do this for you. You may well find that a higher quality spotting scope is needed for your spotter - but wait and see on that.

If you're going to be in the Calgary area when you return home, contact the APRA (Alberta Provincial Rifle Association). Take up target shooting with them on their 900m range. In addition to whatever field shooting you are able to do on your own, you will learn more, faster, when you are shooting in a rifle competition. And you will have, for free, the advice of some very skilled long range shooters to draw upon.

I've been to Homestead a few times as my cranky so-called-spotter shoots IDPA there. It's definitely an idea as it's less than an hour from my back door and you're right... The information a person can glean even as an observer is invaluable to someone as novice as I am with long range shooting. As you well know though, it's hard to break into circles you don't frequent very often. I, and most shooters that like to actually shoot (instead of just show off expensive toys that will always outperform yours, cost more than yours and was custom built by Mr. SO-and-so out of Las Vegas that only builds firearms for celebrities...) are kind of loners and stick out in normal people crowds... It's not homophobia, just a non-need for chit chat and pissing contests.

That being said, however, I was timid of the 3 gun crowd last year also and they turned out to be some of the best guys on the block. Not a pissing contest to be seen and everyone was just out to seriously have fun and be safe. I can only hope the long range crowd is the same! I won't say specifically which crowd I was pushed into to shoot with that always had their noses in the air at me and my "standard" gear and substandard factory ammo (starts with an I and ends with a C...), but I hope to have a more positive experience than that. I'm super laid back and generally open to ideas and just like to shoot.

Sounds like you guys are the same, :)
 
Great thread KK.
Thanks Daniel, much to be learned from your words.

This may drift the topic a wee bit, but I've been seeing a pattern develop with HS Precision equipped HB 700's and 5R's.

Bedding.

Three of the four rifles I've recently tuned(all with aluminum bedding blocks), have required a skim bedding to reach their potential. The one that did not, a 5R, shot inside .4MOA with very minimal load development.
The others were MOA'ish, until properly bedded, whereapon they became 1/2 MOA shooters with tuned handloads.
This is in the field shooting, calm air, off the bipod with a rear bean bag ... not benchrested.

Just today, the Nephew showed up at the range with a sweet .308 700 HB 20 incher in a HS stock. On loosening and re-snugging the front guard screw, the barrel rose and fell 1/4" at the forend tip, the tang, it flexed maybe 10 thou.. Not good.
It was a 1 1/4MOA shooter. He did get one .535MOA 5 shot group with 46 Varget/155Amax though. After we bed it, no doubt she'll lob 'em into bugholes.

FWIW, Varget and 155 Amax have shot very well in every 700 I've ever played with. That bullet happily tolerates the substantial jump which long throated factory 700's demand.
These rifles also respond to straight, low runout handloads, as they make the jump across those long leades. Fliers/unexplained LR misses seem to rear thier ugly heads at much over two thou. TIR.

Thanks man! I'm glad the thread is developing and has as much info in it!!! It can drift mildly OT and I don't care so long as it's all related to long distance shooting, loading, .308, bipods or anything really within the realm of what I should know while still in this build.

Bedding is something I had thought about, but not very much. It being a factory rifle I was only going to give it the "piece of paper around the barrel" check before boxing it up and paying for it, lol... Re-stocking and bedding is definitely an option and even re-barreling it (of course eventually I will anyway) as the SA is the key piece for me. Bedding will be a tell-tale only after I've shot it at distance though. I'd prefer to stick with a non-tactical-looking stock, but I can see some advantages in the AI stocks as far as adjustability. However, even when only shooting my Marlin XT in .17HMR out at 300 yards I just plain old prefer front rest and bag on the rear also. I like to be able to squeeze and feel the adjustments instead of just dialing something up and I ain't no sniper...

Cheers and thanks again for the ridiculously valuable info!
 
This is fun.

You've paid your dues. Well said.
That is just how it feels with irons at ridiculous distance. An art. With a side order of Zen.
But ... but .. it costs more than $500.

Oh my. How are his ears?.
Have you any familiarity with spotting bullet trace?. It'll surely jazz ya the first time a bullet in flight is observed arcing downrange. So cool.
Sometimes a thin white vapour trail, sometimes you'll see the bullet glinting in the sun, sometimes it's like a disturbance in the force field ... a boiling of the atmosphere.
Get 'ol cranky to ditch all 3 pairs of glasses, adjust the spotting's scope focus to his naked eye, set the focus at 3/4's of the distance to the target .... and the most important thing, get that spotting scope as close as possible to the rifles boreline. Hard against the shooter, just behind and just over his right shoulder works well. When you get it dialed, bullet flight will be as easy to follow as a tracer round is.
After some practice, one can usually call the hit/miss well before the projectile actually strikes.

I try to explain that feeling to people... And it's as the old saying goes, "If I have to explain it, you'll never understand.". It's definitely a Zen thing. You have to shut off your brain to the real world in a sense. It's part of the reason why I shoot. It's my release from work and life when I get home. If I don't shoot when I'm home on leave then my next hitch out usually sucks. Being a month in month out in Albania at the moment I need all the stress relief I can get, hahaha!!! This principle applies to everything in life though... Whether I'm at TSE and making 1.5 inch groups with my Shadow at 10 yards slow-fire or picking off pest rodents with a 1938 Mauser at 200 yards for my neighbors or riding my bike through the deserts of AZ... Focus. Inner quiet. It really does a body good. Doesn't make me much of a "people person" though, HAHA!

>$500 scope... Yes, glass will be expensive, but I'm cool with that. If it's to be a one-time-buy deal then I am all over the best I can get for the right price. If that price is $500 then great! If it's $2500 then not so great, but still an investment for the long term. I'm honestly more worried about finding the right fit for the purpose and I think for me being a beginner the advantage of high power is going to help me learn. 8-32 or 5-25 is right about where the majority vote is for an optic to do what I require.

Absolutely no familiarity with bullet trace other than seeing some YouTube vids of it. When I'm shooting irons I'm lucky if the muzzle is down on the rifle before the target is hit. That old 8mm kicks like a mule (not shoulder hurt kick, but plenty of rise to the muzzle with my hotter loads) and my M39 is only marginally better. I also don't think I shoot far enough to be able to pick it up with a naked eye. Only shooting out to 500 yards tops and usually if we're just having fun it's spray painted water-filled washer fluid jugs at 300-400 yards with factory ammo. Keep in mind, to the average guy that's some decent distance. The only other time I have seen bullet trace is once as a kid when shooting Huns across a section with .30-06 Accelerators. It was a really cold morning and we were probably 800-1000 yards away and you could see the white trail from the tiny bullet fired out of that .30-06... was pretty effing cool anyway, lol!

Yeah, I may end up just keeping the old Bushnell (and I mean old... He used to use it as a window clamped spotter at lunch time before I was born so minimum 35-40 years old...) for kicking around in the back of the truck and short range stuff as it has TERRIBLE light gathering ability. It's not top notch and the power mag is not really going to be enough I don't think. So, that leads into another question that could use much input from you guys. Brand, power and feature I should be looking at for an upgrade to my spotting scope? Keep in mind that old blind-face Mc. Cranky will be using it, not me so it should be tailored to his needs. I do already have a ROCK solid tripod for the spotting scope and a decent, lightweight short tripod for my range finder.

*Edit: He has Spock-like hearing... He can hear a mouse drop a turd at 50 paces still. Guy freaks me out sometimes, lol!

Plus 1 for the advice on the spotting scope... I feel like a derp knowing that I hadn't though of keeping the spotting scope in line with trajectory... It's always sat at a 45 degree angle and right of the shooter. Being in line makes a LOT more sense!

Thanks for the kick a$$ input again guys... This is really making me wish I was in Canada right now, lol!
 
The 5R milspec.

I own three of these rifles. Two are still unfired. One is in a tan HS stock (same as the one that comes with the 5R but taken off a VSF) the other two are stock.

I've had the triggers brought down to 3 pounds. That being said my best group to date was from a bone stock 5R with the 5lbs trigger. Clean and crisp. I haven't felt the need to upgrade the trigger. I have a shilen on a Xr-100 and a Timmey's tactical on a 7WSSM (wildcat) super R as I like to call it. Yet the 5R trigger does the job very nicely for that rifle.

Optics: I have the 12-42X NXS NF on my 7mm wildcat. Only 45 moa so keep that in mind. For NF scopes I prefer the NP-R1 reticle. But that's subjective.

I have A Zeiss Conquest with Rapid Z1000 yard reticle on mine. It seems to match the rifle perfectly. The reticle also takes care of the problem with only 50 moa in the scope. I went with two piece Leupold bases and Leupold PRW rings. I sighted this rifle in wit 3 shots. A recommendation, sight in with Federal 165 fusion. I got 3/4 moa out of this stuff at 100 yards with my 5R. Then one click up and shoot 168 Federal gold. You'll be right on target.

Will probably go Sightron S3 8-32x for the tan stocked one. NF and up are of course also excellent.

I will add that these rifles have a following for a reason. It's not just another factory rifle. Torque down the action screws to 65 and you're set to go. No bedding required.

Here's mine.

5R-2.jpg


RapidZ1000May07.jpg
 
Last edited:
###y... And yes, I actually haven't heard a SINGLE bad thing about them that can't be sorted with minimal effort and/or cost.

Thanks for some more gun ####!
 
###y... And yes, I actually haven't heard a SINGLE bad thing about them that can't be sorted with minimal effort and/or cost.

Thanks for some more gun ####!

Usually no cost other than the price of a firearms torque screwdriver.

I see people changing things up on these rifles before even shooting them. Sometimes that's not a good idea.

Oh and the suspicious look you get from Fudds at the range is priceless. Their instincts are telling them this is a "sniper" rifle but it doesn't look like one. When they see the target they figure it out. But it's somehow acceptable to them. It's a sleeper.
 
Been following this thread for awhile.
I originally set out for a 700 5r in 223 (because I have enough quality ammo on hand already it seemed to make most economical sense). After reading everything I could on the 5r I bought one in 308.
The info available was limited on both the 223 and 300 - and everyone and their uncle seemed to have good results with it in 308 - so now I own one :)

I will be using a bushnell 3200 elite bone collector DOA scope as funds are dry - and I will only be shooting 100 and 200 yards for now. For the future, new glass.

Good read folks. And to the fellow who owns three 5r's - did you get one in each caliber?
 
Usually no cost other than the price of a firearms torque screwdriver.

I see people changing things up on these rifles before even shooting them. Sometimes that's not a good idea.

Oh and the suspicious look you get from Fudds at the range is priceless. Their instincts are telling them this is a "sniper" rifle but it doesn't look like one. When they see the target they figure it out. But it's somehow acceptable to them. It's a sleeper.

No tinkering to be done with this rifle until something rears it's head. It's the platform I choose to learn on because of it's simplicity, :)

It being a sleeper is a SUPER bonus... I really love it when people stop shooting at the range to ask me what I'm shooting (like it's some kind of magical pistol/rifle in my hand or something that has lazers and tracking sensors...) at TSE. I just tell them is some old piece of Czech junk I got from my grandpappies farm, :D In reality, it's a Shadow, but it's not JUST the tool... Yes, decent hardware "helps", but it's the shooter that makes the gun, not the other way around.

PLUS when stopped by game cops I won't raise so many eyebrows. Just looks like a bull-barreled hunting rifle.
 
Congrats on investing in quality kit - particularly the scope. You will NEVER regret buying a nightforce. as to reticles, it is a personal choice, but I like them very uncluttered. Mil dots and such are basically obsolete and imprecise in the age of rangefinders. I like the NP2-DD.

The remington triggers are excellent and can be tuned down to 2 pounds or even less. Lapua brass is the only way to go.

Beware because the mystical koolaid fanclub will be saying you should buy Stevens guns, sightron scopes and use winchester brass and then buy all the upgrades. You have a good platform there. It will shoot well and it will want only for a custom barrel down the road to be turned into a 100% comptetition-winning rifle.

Having owned a Savage 10 HS Precision and now own a 700 LTR the Savage was more accurate the the 700 with match ammo. I am hoping that my hand loads will improve the accuracy with the LTR but as of right now, I'm not impressed with it.
 
Having owned a Savage 10 HS Precision and now own a 700 LTR the Savage was more accurate the the 700 with match ammo. I am hoping that my hand loads will improve the accuracy with the LTR but as of right now, I'm not impressed with it.

The LTR was considered the most accurate 700 about 5 years ago or so. It's a decent rifle. But like the 700P it has a twist rate of 1:12. Plus it has a lighter stock with smaller palm swell that some love and others don't. Check the crown, torque the stock down to 65 (make sure both screws are torqued the same) and then give reloading a try or test out a bunch of different match ammo.

Now the 5R started with a bit of cult status after many reports of excellent accuracy. There were rumours that the 5R while not a custom product was put together in their custom shop. Normally Id dismiss such rumours except gunsmiths have posted that the actions were already trued/blue printed when they went to work on them. One guy who seemed to be a Remington employee which appeared credible stated they were built to be 1/4 moa rifles. Also that the barrels were made on the M24 tooling and were a run not rejects.

Lots of stuff that can't be verified about these rifles. That being said the ones Ive shot were sub .5moa at 100 and 200 yards. The barrel on them is very good and the components seem to work exceptionally well together. They shoot very well and with off the shelf match ammo. Reloads are already well established so if reloading it's easy.

The main thing is these rifles seem to be consistent with these results.
 
Been following this thread for awhile. ..

Good read folks. And to the fellow who owns three 5r's - did you get one in each caliber?

All 3 of mine are 308. I bought the first one after doing all the research and finally locating one. Then I found a store selling them for 1K, they had one left. I couldn't say no. Then I found a tan HS stock off a VSF 308 in the EE which is the ame as the green one that comes with the 5R. Followed by a 5R in the EE without a stock. Again 1K mark. Desert R was born! It's a 666 series one too.

You can see how it happened.

I was looking for one in 223 but already have a VSSFII in 223. Eventually I might get one. I'm not interested in the 300 win mag at this time.
 
All 3 of mine are 308. I bought the first one after doing all the research and finally locating one. Then I found a store selling them for 1K, they had one left. I couldn't say no. Then I found a tan HS stock off a VSF 308 in the EE which is the ame as the green one that comes with the 5R. Followed by a 5R in the EE without a stock. Again 1K mark. Desert R was born! It's a 666 series one too.

You can see how it happened.

I was looking for one in 223 but already have a VSSFII in 223. Eventually I might get one. I'm not interested in the 300 win mag at this time.

I've been thinking in the long run of doing a tan stock swap (or getting it coated) and cera-coating the action/barrel... Not sure I like the $$$ involved though, LOL! For now I will pretend it's all FDE when I pick it up. I won't be using it for anything but target so it's not necessary. Just a vanity thing, :D
 
The LTR was considered the most accurate 700 about 5 years ago or so. It's a decent rifle. But like the 700P it has a twist rate of 1:12. Plus it has a lighter stock with smaller palm swell that some love and others don't. Check the crown, torque the stock down to 65 (make sure both screws are torqued the same) and then give reloading a try or test out a bunch of different match ammo.

Now the 5R started with a bit of cult status after many reports of excellent accuracy. There were rumours that the 5R while not a custom product was put together in their custom shop. Normally Id dismiss such rumours except gunsmiths have posted that the actions were already trued/blue printed when they went to work on them. One guy who seemed to be a Remington employee which appeared credible stated they were built to be 1/4 moa rifles. Also that the barrels were made on the M24 tooling and were a run not rejects.

Lots of stuff that can't be verified about these rifles. That being said the ones Ive shot were sub .5moa at 100 and 200 yards. The barrel on them is very good and the components seem to work exceptionally well together. They shoot very well and with off the shelf match ammo. Reloads are already well established so if reloading it's easy.

The main thing is these rifles seem to be consistent with these results.

I will recheck the bolts and thanks for the help. I was a little bummed with the score that I got with match ammo and the LTR, I was expecting better. I fully agree that things will improve with my handloads and I hope to get at least 1/2 MOA.
 
Strange because I have a 6-9 and I rarely extend it more than 1 notch...

I guess most of our targets are low, level, or slightly higher. I can't see myself ever going over 9" though...

I am talking strictly for shooting prone, not off the bench. At a gun club with a flat manicured range and elevated shooting platforms, 6-9" works well enough for shooting prone. But for all around use between gun ranges and field use over uneven terrain, the 9-13" is more flexible IME. I have both the 6-9 and 9-13 and the latter serves 90% of my field prone shooting, but I do shoot quite a lot at informal ranges where terrain is uneven and the vegetation is not manicured.
 
Back
Top Bottom