Remington 788 - What do you have?

Must have been a 6mm in it's previous life

Yes it was. Was such a shame, rifle appeared unfired, not even a mark on the bolt face. Unfortunantly as is the case of a lot of safe queens, the last 1.5" of the muzzle had severe erosionand was toast - the rest of the bore as new. My options were to cut it shorter, but I always thought one of these in .257 Roberts would be awesome and rebore it. Going from 6mm to .257 wouldn't remove all the grooves so 6.5 it was. 6.5x57 was a natural and the gun came with 3 new 6mm Rem. mags so that round fits and feeds like a glove.
 
I just picked one a few weeks ago. Sat in a cabinet for decades.
Had a ton of scratches and dents. Had the Frozen trigger issue from Grease never being cleaned out and re-oiled.
Got it home dismantled the trigger and freed it up, but the trigger spring and aluminum body were rusted out.
Put in a new TImney at 3lbs, cleaned the hell out of it. (32 years of crud and oil). Barrel and innards are excellent.
Took the bolt apart and cleaned it out. (yuk). Solvent worked great. Lightly oiled and put back together.
Cycles beautiful. (2 mags included).
Took the stock down to bare wood. WALNUT!
5 coats for true oil and she's looking great.
It had a Williams sight on a t some point and the guy kept the piece of wood cutout and epoxied it back in.
It is the light area under the scope. It was in a gun cab so it will darken over time to near match the rest of stock now that's in the light.
Not sure if the pics will show. I'll keep trying if they don't.
Out to the range in a few weeks.
I've got a cheap VisionKing 1.5-6x42 on it. This thing accumualtes light at dawn and dusk really well.
I have very dark woods in certain spots and an accumulation scope is required.
I have these on a couple rifles and they work great. The longest shot is 90yds so quality isn't critical. Light is.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/S1qFhsNYPHSxwbwc7

It's a hunting rifle, not a museum piece. So perfection isn't required. It's now usable.
That is what is important for me.

I watched that rifle til the end.. The turn off for me was the recoil pad and the unknown history. Unfortunately turned one down years back in favour of a 600 in 35Rem from the same seller. Hoping to run across another. What I do have is a 222, a 308 with a seriously custom thumbhole stock and a 30/30.
 
I’ve owned 3, 788’s over the years.
My first one was a right hand 22-250, I had a blast with that rifle slaying a truck load of ground squirrels one summer.

The next one started life as a 6mm and is a left hand action. It’s was shipped off to have a pencil thin .284” barrel installed and chambered in .284 Win, the gunsmith fluted the receiver in 4 places, thinned and flattened the bolt knob like a A-bolt, I wrangled an MPI fibreglass stock and topped it off with a Leupold Ultralight 3-9x it tips the scales at 7.6 pounds with a sling and 3 rounds in the magazine. For the longest time this was my only big game rifle, and I shot the first barrel out and had a Gailliard mountain contour .284 Win barrel installed since.

My latest started out as a left hand 6mm too, it was tweaked too having a #4 contour Jury, 6.5 mm, 1 in 8 twist tube fitted and chambered in .260 REM. I had MCRS tactical build me a laminate stock from a blank I had, it’s a broad fore end, with a garish grip styled stock of my own creation, the rifle is a sort of long range stand rifle/ target rifle and it sure can flog 140 grain match bullets or Sierra Gameking’s into teeny groups at distance…..
 
I watched that rifle til the end.. The turn off for me was the recoil pad and the unknown history. Unfortunately turned one down years back in favour of a 600 in 35Rem from the same seller. Hoping to run across another. What I do have is a 222, a 308 with a seriously custom thumbhole stock and a 30/30.

Gent I used to work with, passed on now, used to customize all his 788's with thumbhole stocks. John loved those things. - dan
 
Picked up a 788 deuce about 2 months ago now. This is the second one I’ve owned. First one was in excellent condition with 4 clips that I sold to fund a beautiful Tikka stainless and walnut deuce. Guns came and went to fund projects but when I came across another 88 deuce with original near new metalwork, I had to have it. Stock ( not walnut) has no dents to speak of, but was seemingly removed and sprayed with a spray bomb clear lacquer. Will be a fun project to strip it and doll it up with proper sanding and Tru oil. Will not be parting with this rifle so bedding it is next on the menu followed by a trigger swap (if I can ever find one). Told a friend about my purchase and he miraculously had an excellent condition clip (properly labeled) in a drawer which I purchased for a spare ��. I’m into this for $700 so far and could not be happier to be back in the 88 club again.
 
MY factory 22-250 became a donor... built a 20-250Ackley on a PacNor SuperMatch shooting 55gr. Bergers @ 3800fps with RL16 Lapua Brass
Feeds as a single shot
 
222
243
7mm08
308
All good shooters but still a budget rifle. Poor quality metal, cheap wood stocks (unless you are fortunate enough to own a first year production that were fitted with nice walnut), weak bolt handles, cheap extractor, and most had terrible triggers. They have a reputation for being accurate shooters but a lot of that can be atributed to the fast lock time. Any gunsmith that has worked on a 788 will have probably had to clean up corroded chambers, re soldered bolt handles back on, replaced extractors, and in some cases, clean up damaged bolt lugs. They were cheaply built when new in 1967 and haven't got any better with age. I still have a first year production in 222 with a Timney trigger that shoots as good as my Sako A1 V but the quality doesn't compare to a new Savage Axis and I can't see any Savage Axis becoming collectable in my lifetime.
 
Last edited:
I've only got one; A 222 with McMillan stock and reworked trigger put together by the guy we can't name. Got it with a few new clips, 100s of rounds loaded in new brass, Redding bushing dies, and rings and bases for 300 bucks. Shot it once to sight it in and confirm that it shot extremely well, then propped it in the safe and haven't looked at it since. Typical bargain, something you don't need at a price you can't refuse. :)
 
Speaking of .44s, many years ago I saw one in left hand. I suspect that would be pretty rare.
I've been working on a couple. Acquired a nice .308 estate rifle from which the bolt had been lost. Installed a bolt that I had repaired (detached handle). The other is a real bitser. Bought a barreled receiver in .22-.250, because I had a bolt and the rest of the parts including a magazine. In both cases, headspace is OK - can feel the NO GO.
Left over, I have a .22-.250 receiver and a repaired bolt. Handle had been broken off. I installed a handle for a 110 Savage. Instead of the handle being stuck in a hole on the side, the collar wraps around the rear of the bolt body. Someone mentioned a .45ACP. The slot on the bottom of the receiver clears a 1911 magazine. This would be a good action for such a project. I have a .45ACP reamer - should keep my eyes open for a barrel.
I've reinstalled handles on about 20 788 bolts. These things cannot be abused.
They are also not a good choice for hot loads. Not a matter of strength, but rather bolt compression and case stretching. Hot load = hard extraction = case stretching. If there is hard extraction, do not muscle the bolt handle...
I think there are at least 3 788 receivers. Short and long. Short in two versions for .222/.223 and .22-.250. Different width magazine openings. Long for .243 through .308. Don't know about .30-30 and .44 receivers. Did they use their own unique ones?
I think it is about time for someone to do a run of 788 magazines. Darn things aren't common and are expensive when found.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Remington had 3 different action lengths for 788

When ordering a new stock you have to be careful. These action distances are what decides your stock size at Boyd's for example.

For whatever reason Remington caused alot of pain with the naming conventions in these rifles.

Long Action, 243 and .308 Winchesters measured 6-9/16 inches.
Short Action, 222/233, 22-250 Remington, and .30-30 Winchester measured 6-5/16 inches
Ultra Short Action, (44 Mag) action measured 5-5/8 inches
 
I've only got one; A 222 with McMillan stock and reworked trigger put together by the guy we can't name. Got it with a few new clips, 100s of rounds loaded in new brass, Redding bushing dies, and rings and bases for 300 bucks. Shot it once to sight it in and confirm that it shot extremely well, then propped it in the safe and haven't looked at it since. Typical bargain, something you don't need at a price you can't refuse. :)

LOL no kidding. Think of the 1000s lying around gun cabinets in Canada. I personally know a family member with every caliber except the 44 mag in original boxes never fired. I've tried for decades to get the 30-30 and he tells to "you know what".
788 fanatics are like no other - lol

He's told me I'll get the 30-30 in Walnut when he's gone... hehe
He knows it's driving me nuts but that is his way.
I have a feeling I'll get them all since his kids don't hunt.
Out of respect for him the only one I'd shoot would be the 30-30
Then go have a few beers in honor of him.
 
It's turned out to be very good.
It's far better than I thought. It's hardly been shot.
I suspect it was shot by a granddad then put away and the trigger seized up.
The barrel innards and all the metal are near perfect. Just age got to it.
 
I finally had the 44 out to the range yesterday. Zeroed it and shot 3 groups each of 3 with some white box and Magtech 240 gr soft points.
Yup it's 788 alright. 1moa or better.
Interesting had some 20 mph wind come up and had a couple vertical stringing to 2moa.
When you are chucking 44 magnum big fat plywood booyahts they sure drift with headwinds. Lol.
Aerodynamic they isn't.
It'll be at most a 100yd woods gun anyway so it won't be an issue where I hunt
 
My kids each took their first deer with a 788 carbine in 7mm08 loaded with 120gr sierra bullets. I had a 788 308 for a while. They are surprisingly accurate. 788 is a good rifle with the only possible downside being the bolt is rear locking. It should not be loaded hot or cases will stretch more than in a front locking action. Keep to factory ammo pressure levels and there's no problem.
 
Last edited:
My kids each took their first deer with a 788 carbine in 7mm08 loaded with 120gr sierra bullets. I had a 788 308 for a while. They are surprisingly accurate. 788 is a good rifle with the only possible downside being the bolt is rear locking. It should not be loaded hot or cases will stretch more than in a front locking action. Keep to factory ammo pressure levels and there's no problem.

I think that's why I've seen so many 788 with no bolt or fixed bolt. Trying to knock the bolt open on a jammed action.
 
Back
Top Bottom