I was recently doing a job where i might be presented with a fast moving target(up to 30kmh) as it was coming towards me. There is no time to dial so with the reticle I had I knew with a 100m zero the first mildot was 300m, the second 425m, the third was 537m, the fourth 623m and the top of the duplex was 737m. With that said a real mildot reticle is not the way to go because the dot blocks out the target at longer ranges. A TMR or P4 fine with hash marks is the way to go so that you have a aiming mark and a visual on the target at the same.time.
My guess is that your "target" was a bit bigger then a charging GOPHER
We know reticle ranging is not very precise. Our eyes just don't work that great through the scope. BUT for the application which these reticles were orig designed (min of large hard object), the slight error just doesn't matter.
I am guessing an arty shell has a bit of leeway to flatten whatever it is sent at. So the quick and close enough ranging works superbly.
Look at the target ranging of the Dragunov PSOP scopes. Brilliant. In this application, is anyone going to care if it hit the "wrong" button?
BUT for LR precision shooting as in hitting itty bitty targets like pop cans, clays, gophers and gongs, that 1/4 to 1 min of error both in calc and/or round up WILL cause you to miss.
On my hunting rifle, I am going to put on a Sightron SII Big Sky 3-9 w/ HHR reticle. Their version of a BDC. All I need to know is the general value of each line and put it on target - a target inside 400yds. The target will be big enough that a inch here or there on impact will have zero change in result.
For this type of situation, reticle for drop can work superbly BUT it is very crude and the further you go, the less likely it will work.
Reticles with MOA spacing become far more useful in this situation.
And if you use a reticle, do think in MOA. Way less math involved.
Jerry