My favourite is that some bullets are travelling too fast to expand.
I had one hunter packing a 300 Weatherby tell me he shot a moose at 800 yards with it.
I asked Him where is gun shot at 200 yards. He informed me that he sighted in to hit
point of aim at 300 yards cause then he was good for a dead on hold out to 800 yards.
I came back: "How is that possible?"
His reply: "The 300 Weatherby does not drop any between 300 and 800 yards"
I just had to walk away. Dave.
These are the realm of fiction carried by some as fact, but fit the subject,
How about the old one about shooting across water, and it pulling the bullet down?
Or any number of misunderstandings about slope and apparent drop? Can’t tell you how many mountain clients tell me a mix of bizarre theories, some of them ex-Marines and the like.
Or that heavier bullets “hit harder”, when often the opposite is actually true in most scenarios from a given chambering?
Or that slow (sub-2200fps) and heavy (250grs+) rounds are some form of stopping rifle, that will drop dangerous game and bears where they stand?
I had one hunter packing a 300 Weatherby tell me he shot a moose at 800 yards with it.
I asked Him where is gun shot at 200 yards. He informed me that he sighted in to hit
point of aim at 300 yards cause then he was good for a dead on hold out to 800 yards.
I came back: "How is that possible?"
His reply: "The 300 Weatherby does not drop any between 300 and 800 yards"
I just had to walk away. Dave.
I've had someone tell me he shot several deer with his Marlin 30-30 at 500 yards. When I asked him how much he held over top of the deer he told me he just "placed the horizontal crosshair along the top of the deers back". he believed it was because he was using 150 gr bullets, and they flatter shooting than 170 gr bullets.
I have heard more than a few people claim that a 30-30 won't kill a moose.
I guess the PH's that use large bore rifles that throw heavy bullets for use on large, dangerous animals don't know that. From your post you think they should be using smaller bullets with less energy.
I wonder why they didn't think of that .... ?
"Use enough gun." Robert Ruark
Took bear with .505 Gibbs, and frankly a .243 is more likely to give you a bang flop on a bear.
Good thread idea.
Like when bullets "go to sleep" and become more accurate at distances beyond 100 yards.
I've got a .270 WIN Rem 7600 that puts out 2.5'' groups at 100 but can get 1-1/4'' at 200.
That the bullet rises above the line of bore after leaving the barrel...
I've got a .270 WIN Rem 7600 that puts out 2.5'' groups at 100 but can get 1-1/4'' at 200.
Bet you don't. There are some loads/bullets that will shoot smaller groups in terms of minute of angle at longer range than at shorter ranges, but there is no way any bullet from any gun can find its way back toward the line of sight after it has deviated from it. It's one of the more ridiculous myths that it could.




























