It's hunting rifle not a safe queen. I wouldn't notice such tiny things.
Light piece with a lot of recoil. The butt stock to receiver fit should be perfect full contact. At $1779.00 that shouldn’t be too much to ask.
Gap seems pretty consistent in the first pic, and doesn't wood expand?
Well almost ALL the cracked 2-piece stocks I've seen over the decades started with poor fitting. If you have intermittent contact, the recoil force only applies to the wood that touches the metal. Laminated wood can crack also. I've owned 2 that split in poorly glued areas.
Not so sure it's 1/32. That would bug the hell out of me. And the fact that its better than the Remlins is little consolation. I know Ruger can do better and let's hope their dicked up demo guns are improved upon. It's important for Ruger to hear real world feedback, not pay-for-positive reviews.
View attachment 550553
That gap, everyone is talking about is 1/32 or less. Remlins had serious miss fit, misaligned of metal and wood, almost all tilted, poorly indexed barrels/sights.
My issue would be the price. Marlin 1895 are a woods range, thick cover, anything but all around hunting rifle. What's the final price after Kanadian peso conversion, and passing through several distributor/retailer? Prices for JM 1895 in the EE are ridiculous, but might seem a bargain. Suppose people have a right to complain if it's not perfect as a $3k rifle.
$1699 when the old SBL’s were in the last run there were $1549 in my option I’m surprised it’s not over 2K with demand and improvements.