Sad find today in the woods.

Status
Not open for further replies.
How about any one not killing the deer with one shot is a idiot,this would put all the types of hunting on a even plane.The choice of shot would be up to the hunter and when they are all one shot kills there is no more discussion on the type of shot you take or style of hunting you prefer.I think knowing when to pull the trigger is more important than what style of hunting you prefer.I have not recovered deer in the past,that makes me a idiot unlike the perfect few.

knowing when to pull the trigger is NOT when you're staring down mr bucks browneye. thats all ill say about bullet placement.

as for multiple shots, it happens to everyone. but, over 9 for one deer? like i said, 3 shots at a pizza pan at 50 yards once a year and you're good out to 1200 yards or so. ;)
 
Look... nobody is calling anyone who doesn't recover deer an idiot... an idiot is a hunter who takes a low percentage shot at a deer not caring whether the animal runs off and suffers etc.... Milo Hanson for example took 9 shots at the same deer.... 9.... that is nuts... and the only reason I even said anything about it is because somebody posted that Milo "knew his chit"..... hunt the way you want to hunt... just be ethical about it and follow up on your shots....

Who says he took 9 shots? From the stories I read they were all shooting. It was pushed out of a couple of different poplar bluffs before it was brought to bag. The first time if fell was after a shot from Hanson, which he quickly followed up with a second shot which ended the hunt. Were you there?

I will laugh in the face of any hunter that posts they would not shoot at a running buck that would go over 200. Everyone has seen the pictures. You absolutely know that class of deer when you see it.

Come on...really??? That monster boils out of a slough bottom at about 250, crosses a field you have permission to be in, the shot is safe, and you don't shoot ? Milo and crew obviously cared enough to follow that deer until it was down, not knowing it was hit until they finally brought it to bag. I would guess a little buck fever??
 
Oh yeah. Almost forgot. Hanson did follow up on his shots. It's the world record in case you hadn't heard.


On a lighter note I wonder how he cooked it. Do you make the world record into kiehlbasa? Bratwurst? or do you go gourmet?
 
Who says he took 9 shots? From the stories I read they were all shooting. It was pushed out of a couple of different poplar bluffs before it was brought to bag. The first time if fell was after a shot from Hanson, which he quickly followed up with a second shot which ended the hunt. Were you there?

A taxidermist I know has been hunting in Sask for over 10yrs, with one of Milo's family members, who has first hand knowlege of that hunt...Spotted by a bus driver at first who passed on the sighting...The group proceeded to push bush...Milo got shooting at the buck on three seperate drives...The fourth drive is when he finally hit the buck...

What you read sounds alot better, does it not??? Thats why you read what you read IMO...Record buck down, and no harm done by buttering up the story a bit..Many hunters do this...
 
Last edited:
Milo knows his s**t alright... He got the buck and you, super brad... did not.
It may seem unfortunate to some here that they dont have the privelige to hunt thousands of acres in a row, and dont need to spend hours entertaining themselves scouting and playing around in the bush..

Western hunters dont f**k around with that. They know where the game is and simply hunt them, whats the problem with that?.

Every shot at an animal is fully intended to kill it, untill youve been there behind the rifle, you will never know how it feels...:slap:

Just because a shot is intended to kill an animal doesn't mean it is a good shot or one that should be taken....

What makes you think I have never done a deer drive or never hunted acreage.... I have permissions on farms with thousands of acres of cut corn and soy etc....

Milo

1- Was not the person who spotted the deer
2- Took 9 shots to kill it

He got lucky plain and simple....

If you come down here and I drive you out to a cornfield with a nice swath of bush in the middle of it and I sit you down on a rock and hand you a rifle and proceed to get a bunch of my buddies to push brush your way and a deer pops out in front of you and you take 9 shots, eventually killing it does that mean you "Know your chit"?
 
I will laugh in the face of any hunter that posts they would not shoot at a running buck that would go over 200. Everyone has seen the pictures. You absolutely know that class of deer when you see it.

and you absolutely know a unethical and selfish hunter when you see one too ;)

it's people like you that give ethical hunters a bad rap. the same ones that don't have a problem with a deer walking around with an arrow sticking out of it or walking around with a dead leg after your hail mary shots. cuz ya know, if it has big antlers it's ok to make ridiculously low percentage shots. lemme guess, it's no big deal if the animal suffers for days before dying in the bush, never to be found? after all, it had a big rack so it was worth the risk :rolleyes:

i can't even begin to understand how "hunters" like you justify taking low percentage shots at an animal simply because it's a trophy. this is not a personal view on ethics either as one of the first thing's you're taught (apparently some weren't) as a new hunter is to WAIT FOR A GOOD SHOT. some of you need to go redo a hunting course to refresh your memory. hunters are supposed to be conservationists that always have the animals best interest in mind, not their own.

i really hope a few of you will read what i've posted below and actually think about it before venturing into the woods, or even worse, teaching a new hunter that hail mary shots are fine as long as it's a trophy or you need to fill the freezer.

BTW...start laughing :rolleyes:


from the ontario hunters guide:

An ethical hunter is not just a sportsman, he is also a naturalist. His interest in wildlife extends beyond game animals to the variety of other living thing's that inhabit the outdoor world. He is just as thrilled by the sight of a bald eagle as a bull moose. He knows and studies nature's ways and realizes that wildlife can be enjoyed year round-not only during the hunting season.

When hunting, his pursuit of game is always governed by the "fair chase" principle. Simply stated, this principle or ethic demands that a hunter shall always give his quarry a "fair" chance to escape being shot.

When hunting big game, an ethical hunter will always attempt to get close enough to his quarry to ensure a quick, clean kill. He realizes that in doing so, his quarry may discover him and escape before he has a chance for a shot. But he always gives his quarry a sporting chance.

Never under any circumstance will an ethical hunter shoot indiscriminately at a flock of game birds or a herd of big game in the hope of hitting one. He will always attempt to kill is quarry quickly and humanely.

Through considerable practice before a hunt, he will learn the distance at which he can be most confident of killing game cleanly. He will ensure his rifle is accurately sighted in and determine the most effective size shot for his shotgun.

Future opportunities to enjoy hunting in North America will depend upon the hunter's public image. If hunters are viewed as people who shoot up the countryside, vandalize property, and disregard the rights of landowners and citizens, they will lose the privilege to hunt on private land and public land as well. However, if an increasing number of hunters follow the honorable traditions of their activity and practice a personal code of hunting ethics which meets public expectations, the future of recreational hunting will be assured.
 
While I do think that excerpt from the ontario guide you posted is mostly BS... with the exception of a few parts.... I agree fully with your stand on ethics and taking low percentage shots.... but of course some will rush in and call me "jealous" because I didn't shoot the Hanson buck.... lol....
 
Omg... Milo was a tard

Wow. And all this time I thought Milo Hanson was an average guy who managed to shoot a world record deer. I didn't know he was mentally handicapped :rolleyes:.

Good for Milo, I'm sure he'd be the first to admit he was lucky. Who cares if he missed that deer on 3 earlier attempts?

I guess I never thought of it before, but I suppose that the world record whitetail being killed by a guy like Milo Hanson must really burn the patch & decal types.
 
I guess the only people who are allowed to shoot a big deer are those who raise their pinky when they drink their tea. You know the ones who stroll the woods with that halo over their head and give off the glow of awesomeness that we can bask in. As much as we like to preach about perfect shooting and perfect ethics hunting is not a perfect sport. Everyone who has been at it for any amount of time will miss, take a low percentage shot, or just f things up. Too many variables and stuff can happen. Like a 213 net buck jumping up. If everything you do is has been perfect then you are full of crap or have a stick stuffed so far up your arse a tractor couldn't pull it out.

If I was Milo I would of let fly also. Legal season, legal location, safe shooting lanes and a buck like that, sorry but I'm taking a bead and pulling the trigger and shooting till the deer is down or the mag is empty. You want to call that " unethical" then fill your boots. If he dropped it on the first shot you would all call him a hero. The man deserves a hand shake and a big congrats. I'll let others carry the most awesome and perfect hunter title. You can call Milo
" The guy with the world record whitetail" and I hope another regular guy like Milo gets the next one.
 
Well call me unethical ...
I have missed a deer...
I have had to shoot more than a single shot :(

I agree with powdergun!
I don't think Milo was a GREAT hunter
he was a lucky hunter
which is more important :cool:
 
i really hope a few of you will read what i've posted below and actually think about it before venturing into the woods, or even worse, teaching a new hunter that hail mary shots are fine as long as it's a trophy or you need to fill the freezer.

Since when is a 250 yard shot at a deer a 'hail mary'??

I seriously doubt you are really any kind of a hunter at all......

What ever you make up your own 'holier than thou mind'. I should feel so fortunate to be so informed by the likes of you:rolleyes:
 
and you absolutely know a unethical and selfish hunter when you see one too ;)

it's people like you that give ethical hunters a bad rap. the same ones that don't have a problem with a deer walking around with an arrow sticking out of it or walking around with a dead leg after your hail mary shots. cuz ya know, if it has big antlers it's ok to make ridiculously low percentage shots. lemme guess, it's no big deal if the animal suffers for days before dying in the bush, never to be found? after all, it had a big rack so it was worth the risk :rolleyes:

i can't even begin to understand how "hunters" like you justify taking low percentage shots at an animal simply because it's a trophy. this is not a personal view on ethics either as one of the first thing's you're taught (apparently some weren't) as a new hunter is to WAIT FOR A GOOD SHOT. some of you need to go redo a hunting course to refresh your memory. hunters are supposed to be conservationists that always have the animals best interest in mind, not their own.

i really hope a few of you will read what i've posted below and actually think about it before venturing into the woods, or even worse, teaching a new hunter that hail mary shots are fine as long as it's a trophy or you need to fill the freezer.

BTW...start laughing :rolleyes:


from the ontario hunters guide:

An ethical hunter is not just a sportsman, he is also a naturalist. His interest in wildlife extends beyond game animals to the variety of other living thing's that inhabit the outdoor world. He is just as thrilled by the sight of a bald eagle as a bull moose. He knows and studies nature's ways and realizes that wildlife can be enjoyed year round-not only during the hunting season.

When hunting, his pursuit of game is always governed by the "fair chase" principle. Simply stated, this principle or ethic demands that a hunter shall always give his quarry a "fair" chance to escape being shot.

When hunting big game, an ethical hunter will always attempt to get close enough to his quarry to ensure a quick, clean kill. He realizes that in doing so, his quarry may discover him and escape before he has a chance for a shot. But he always gives his quarry a sporting chance.

Never under any circumstance will an ethical hunter shoot indiscriminately at a flock of game birds or a herd of big game in the hope of hitting one. He will always attempt to kill is quarry quickly and humanely.

Through considerable practice before a hunt, he will learn the distance at which he can be most confident of killing game cleanly. He will ensure his rifle is accurately sighted in and determine the most effective size shot for his shotgun.

Future opportunities to enjoy hunting in North America will depend upon the hunter's public image. If hunters are viewed as people who shoot up the countryside, vandalize property, and disregard the rights of landowners and citizens, they will lose the privilege to hunt on private land and public land as well. However, if an increasing number of hunters follow the honorable traditions of their activity and practice a personal code of hunting ethics which meets public expectations, the future of recreational hunting will be assured.

Wow great sermon. I guess this means that a lot of you should wait until the birds land in the lake and sluice them. A lot of guys are seriously bad wing shots. Wonder how many ducks are lost:rolleyes:

I really get a crank out of listening to internet holymen like you.

There are more marksmen out there than you are are willing to admit that can roll a running whitetail at 250 like no ones business, and apparently other "hunters" like you that should only be shooting 50 meters from a bench.

You know what? Ontario guys hunt how Ontario guys want to and we will do as we please. We will shoot long distances here (if we can get closer we will), we will shoot running game (if it stops that's great), and we will never give up looking for a lost animal until there is absolutely no hope.

You are right on one thing though. If someone saw that trophy buck run out at 250 and did not have the experience, equipment, or skill (such as yourself) then they absolutely should not shoot.

TTFN
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom