Lets start the new year off right with some interesting fun...
What follows is a story of triumph and disappointment. With some spare time I took my trusty Savage Mark II BV out to the range, hoping it would be humbled by a vintage Anschutz Match 64. Both rifles are bone stock save for trigger tinkering. Both were wearing scopes set at 12x for the duration of the test.
My test protocol was very amateur: three boxes of ammo, one improvised rest, a 100 yard grouping target (disregard the '20 yards' print on the targets), and a 200 yard target for mid-range reference. I figured that I’d shoot to compare relative performance, as opposed to absolute performance, so I chose to fire ten fouling shots of each brand without cleaning before shooting groups with the brand, and shot the same sequence of ammo in each rifle. Both rifles were shot off an improvised rest in the same body position on the bench. I'd run half a box thru one rifle, then finish the box off with the other.
For ammo selection, I started with Eley sport as a low end, found a box of Laupa Super Club for ‘mid range’ though it’s not a heck of a lot better than Sport, and splurged and topped off the spectrum with RWS R50, which I had never tried before. Velocities were not recorded.
For group measuring, I measured in two sets- the best five shots and also the best four shots per group to provide a bit of a filter for ‘pilot error’ if it was present. In the results, the groups are noted as ‘best four over best five’ in inches. I’ve taken measurements to three sigfigs, but the ‘eyeball error’ is likely 20 thou or so, so measurements are ‘thereabouts’, officially. From my perspective, it's dandy that a rifle will put four into a sub-minute group, but if it tosses the fifth with a curve, the best it can claim is the worst accuracy observed. In my opinion a rifle ammo combination is not 'MOA accurate' if it prints two inches on Monday Wednesdays and Fridays, in any caliber.
After an hour and a bit of plinking away I headed down range to check out the results- while I was expecting the 64 to outperform the BV by a significant margin, the results told a less exciting story:
Savage:
Eley Sport: 0.752/1.63, 0.852/1.34 inches
Lapua Super Club : 0.675/1.47 inches, second group not worthy of measurement.
RWS R50: 0.683/1.21, 0.577/1.00 inches
Anschutz:
Eley Sport: 1.05/ 1.40, 0.858/1.02 inches
Lapua Super Club : 0.874/1.31 (best three in this group 0.256), 0.901/1.279 inches
RWS R50: 0.800/0.870, 0.547/0.910 inches
At the end of the day, it appears that the trusty old BV keeps near pace with the 64 (which surprised me)… what a bummer, because the inspiration here was to find a candidate that would clearly outperform the BV! By the looks of it, the 64 did shoot 10 to 15% smaller groups overall, but the Savage (or myself) seemed to have a habit of keeping four shots tighter in comparison, then blowing the group to heck with the fifth. In my opinion, both would be equally competitive depending on whether the driver is having a good or bad day.
At 200 yards, the BV actually outpaced the 64, however I shot at only two targets at that range, so the results were a bit messy to interpret and have a good chance at being unreliable at this point.
Happy New Year-
What follows is a story of triumph and disappointment. With some spare time I took my trusty Savage Mark II BV out to the range, hoping it would be humbled by a vintage Anschutz Match 64. Both rifles are bone stock save for trigger tinkering. Both were wearing scopes set at 12x for the duration of the test.
My test protocol was very amateur: three boxes of ammo, one improvised rest, a 100 yard grouping target (disregard the '20 yards' print on the targets), and a 200 yard target for mid-range reference. I figured that I’d shoot to compare relative performance, as opposed to absolute performance, so I chose to fire ten fouling shots of each brand without cleaning before shooting groups with the brand, and shot the same sequence of ammo in each rifle. Both rifles were shot off an improvised rest in the same body position on the bench. I'd run half a box thru one rifle, then finish the box off with the other.
For ammo selection, I started with Eley sport as a low end, found a box of Laupa Super Club for ‘mid range’ though it’s not a heck of a lot better than Sport, and splurged and topped off the spectrum with RWS R50, which I had never tried before. Velocities were not recorded.
For group measuring, I measured in two sets- the best five shots and also the best four shots per group to provide a bit of a filter for ‘pilot error’ if it was present. In the results, the groups are noted as ‘best four over best five’ in inches. I’ve taken measurements to three sigfigs, but the ‘eyeball error’ is likely 20 thou or so, so measurements are ‘thereabouts’, officially. From my perspective, it's dandy that a rifle will put four into a sub-minute group, but if it tosses the fifth with a curve, the best it can claim is the worst accuracy observed. In my opinion a rifle ammo combination is not 'MOA accurate' if it prints two inches on Monday Wednesdays and Fridays, in any caliber.
After an hour and a bit of plinking away I headed down range to check out the results- while I was expecting the 64 to outperform the BV by a significant margin, the results told a less exciting story:
Savage:

Eley Sport: 0.752/1.63, 0.852/1.34 inches
Lapua Super Club : 0.675/1.47 inches, second group not worthy of measurement.
RWS R50: 0.683/1.21, 0.577/1.00 inches
Anschutz:

Eley Sport: 1.05/ 1.40, 0.858/1.02 inches
Lapua Super Club : 0.874/1.31 (best three in this group 0.256), 0.901/1.279 inches
RWS R50: 0.800/0.870, 0.547/0.910 inches
At the end of the day, it appears that the trusty old BV keeps near pace with the 64 (which surprised me)… what a bummer, because the inspiration here was to find a candidate that would clearly outperform the BV! By the looks of it, the 64 did shoot 10 to 15% smaller groups overall, but the Savage (or myself) seemed to have a habit of keeping four shots tighter in comparison, then blowing the group to heck with the fifth. In my opinion, both would be equally competitive depending on whether the driver is having a good or bad day.
At 200 yards, the BV actually outpaced the 64, however I shot at only two targets at that range, so the results were a bit messy to interpret and have a good chance at being unreliable at this point.
Happy New Year-