I use one as well as a few other old coots here on CGN.Not to derail, but:
What about 7 X 57 "R" ? I have one on order. I realize it's ballistically a twin, but any experience, or anything I should know?

Not to derail, but:
What about 7 X 57 "R" ? I have one on order. I realize it's ballistically a twin, but any experience, or anything I should know?
what's the "R" all about?
I have some unfortunate news. I've used the 7x57 a good deal, still do, and it is exactly the same cartridge as the,
.308 Winchester
.260 Remington
7mm-08
6.5x55
.303 Brit
.30-06
.280 Rem
.270 Winchester
.300 Savage
6.5 Creedmoor
…and on.
All can shoot bullets within about 10% of the weight of each other, within about 10% of the speed of each other, and no animal can tell the difference, and truthfully almost no hunter can either. We're simply spitting accelerated lumps of metal at speed, and those lumps are so similar it's even tighter than Ford / Chevy.Pick the one you feel nostalgia for or can find on your local shop's shelf, and off to the hunting fields. They are a whole bunch of options of the exact same thing, this said, I have a favourite too, and indeed it's the 7x57. Not many good reasons, but it has an illustrious history and well, I just like it.
In the end, suppose what good reasons do we need?
I have some unfortunate news. I've used the 7x57 a good deal, still do, and it is exactly the same cartridge as the,
.308 Winchester
.260 Remington
7mm-08
6.5x55
.303 Brit
.30-06
.280 Rem
.270 Winchester
.300 Savage
6.5 Creedmoor
All can shoot bullets within about 10% of the weight of each other, within about 10% of the speed of each other, and no animal can tell the difference, and truthfully almost no hunter can either...
All can shoot bullets within about 10% of the weight of each other, within about 10% of the speed of each other, and no animal can tell the difference, and truthfully almost no hunter can either....
Hey I'm with you, hitting them is good, hitting them with history is better.




























