For something as important as it is, I’ve yet to find any scope mount that i actually like.
curious, why not Warne/Warne combo?
S&K lows are exactly the same height as Talley lows for reference.
For something as important as it is, I’ve yet to find any scope mount that i actually like.
agreed, but the mountain tech are sweet imoNot a fan of vertical split rings, and they are quite a bit heavier than the nightforce ultralights.
What would the perfect ring and base look like that you designed?
And even better if you don’t like cast crap or machined pot metal. I think the OP clearly demonstrates that. Leupold has gone the same direction.
Machined pot metal... like a Ruger?
It has been suggested many a time that most Talley one piece set ups fail due to being torqued improperly. A quality fit for purpose inch pound wrench... and not something that has Fat in it's name.
Like most things in life, scope rings are definitely a "you get out what you put in" proposition. Performance has very little to do with how much money a feller lays out, and more to do with how much knowledge that same feller applies to what he is actually doing.
And also like most things forum related... it can be made as simple or as complicated as one wishes.
R.
I’m not the one that broke rings Russel. Take that up with your friend Larry.
Back on topic of the Talleys..
Have Talley LW Lows on my Mtn SS. They’ve yet to move after 8yrs of being on it. I either must be lucky in the set I have or I’m not abusing then enough.
Have run several (10 plus) sets for around 20 years now. From a stout 338WM on down. Never had an issue.
A wise feller always chooses skill over luck.
That way he doesn't feel the need to chase his own tail...
R.
I have easily ran that many sets or more over the years. None were over torqued. One did let go on me just like in the OP’s picture. My rifles are never abused or dropped, that would be a different story.
I won’t run them on my rifles anymore.
Any ring is only as good as the material they are made of. Considering all rings are made from some kind of alloy, inclusions are going to be a fact. When the sample size grows, so does the number of "failures". For the sheer numbers of Talley rings produced, the "no fault" failure rate would be incredibly small.
It should also be pointed out that torque is only one of many issues that can fail a ring...
How do you know for certain that they weren't over torqued?
Also, you didn't answer my other questions...
R.
Found it almost impossible to torque Talley rings they stretch and compress badly.