I think mil verses MOA doesn't matter a whole lot.
I've used both,but prefer MOA,because it's what I'm used to.
Guys say mil is easier.
I've had the bushnell LRSH 3-12x44 FFP , mil reticle.
The glass was excellent.
It just didn't have enough magnification for me.
If 12 power is enough for you,then,at $900,you can't go wrong.
I now have a S112 6-24 and am happy with it.
Next upgrade will be an NXS.
When Tomochan says you can't afford cheap glass, I now know what he means...lol
I've been through all the midrange optics, 6 to 8 hundred dollar stuff, and have lost money on the resale.
I've had a bushnell 3-16 elite 6500, Burris Veracity 3-16, Sightron Stac 3-16 and all were mediocre glass.
I don't care how many guys say they're great, I know they're not.
But then again I'm comparing them to $1300 + glass.
To me,glass is either good or it's not.
And Clarity trumps all.
It leads to reaso ,if it has excellent clarity,it should have all the other important features. Tracking,good turrets,etc.
The more mag,the better,for target shooting and you can hunt with a 6-24 ,just as well as a 3-12.
So if you got $700, look at Prophet River, they have a no tax,free shipping deal, monthly.
I just got a Sightron S111 6-24 for $1340 all in.
Put something on layaway and pay it out.
You'll be more pleased,in the long run.