Selling off collection

OK I'll bite, whatever method you're using to compare ballistics is right out to lunch. Maybe you meant similar trajectory? I'll give you that (almost) but certainly not ballistics.

Yep: trajectory.

From Miriam Webster:

Full Definition of BALLISTICS:
1
a : the science of the motion of projectiles in flight
b : the flight characteristics of a projectile

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ballistics
 
X2! ......... I once read a commentary stating that aside from the 222/223 type cased cartridges there really hasn't been very much cartridge advancement since the 270Win.

I would tend to agree with this.

Paul,

do you own a 270? if so next time you re in Yukon for hunting you should have it ....

Phil
 
Got it today. Looks like this this only nicer with a fixed 6X Leupold on it.


https://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&...2F4179856%2FRe_Mountain_Rifle_Actions;798;357

Yep! That's from my post on 24hourcampfire.

It's one that I kept in the corral, and if yours shoots as well you certainly won't be disappointed. It consistently puts a magazine full, five, into less than five inches at 300 meters with the old Redfield 4X. (328 yards for my older friends who are not metricated yet.) :)

Ted
 
Yep! That's from my post on 24hourcampfire.

It's one that I kept in the corral, and if yours shoots as well you certainly won't be disappointed. It consistently puts a magazine full, five, into less than five inches at 300 meters with the old Redfield 4X. (328 yards for my older friends who are not metricated yet.) :)

Ted

Ted,

you cant be the spokersman of two or more calibers ....

you will have to choose lol ...

Phil
 
Ted,

you cant be the spokersman of two or more calibers ....

you will have to choose lol ...

Phil


That was on a thread concerned with weight of mountain rifles. Everyone was posting about the latest and greatest for such work. I wanted them to know that we were hunting with "mountain rifles that would shoot more than fifty years ago.

While they would work, my 9.3s are all quite a bit heavier than that 30-06.

Ted
 
That was on a thread concerned with weight of mountain rifles. Everyone was posting about the latest and greatest for such work. I wanted them to know that we were hunting with "mountain rifles that would shoot more than fifty years ago.

While they would work, my 9.3s are all quite a bit heavier than that 30-06.

Ted

those days men were men and 9 pounds was not an issue for a rifle even in the mountain ...
 
Back
Top Bottom