IMO if you can't handle the recoil of target loads in an O/U 12 Gauge then you're in the wrong hobby...
-M
I guess I'm in the wrong hobby then....
I wish someone would have told me that a lot earlier in my career.
Sorry, there is 0 truth to that statement. Look at all of the competitive shooters who are using recoil reducing equipment, or shooting reduced loads or shooting sub-gauge ammo.
Recoil is not your friend in target sports.
Oh, and a 391 is a fantastic choice.
Brad.
I guess I'm in the wrong hobby then....
I wish someone would have told me that a lot earlier in my career.
Sorry, there is 0 truth to that statement. Look at all of the competitive shooters who are using recoil reducing equipment, or shooting reduced loads or shooting sub-gauge ammo.
Recoil is not your friend in target sports.
Oh, and a 391 is a fantastic choice.
Brad.
I'm not arguing the benefits of recoil reducing equipment for faster follow-ups, I'm just saying if 'recoil' hurts you from a 12Ga with target loads... well, you're different than the guys and gals I used to shoot with when I was on the National Team.
Besides, I said the 391 was a good choice if you HAD to go semi - you gotta give me some credit there!
-M
National Team? Awesome and congrats on reaching that level. What you're forgetting is that back then everyone was way tougher than today's shooters. I was a tough, recoil absorbing, clay smasher years back. O/U's were all I owned except for a pump for hunting with 3" magnums when needed. But if today's technology were available to you back then just think of all the Gold Medals you'd be staring at now!![]()
IMO if you can't handle the recoil of target loads in an O/U 12 Gauge then you're in the wrong hobby...
However, with that said, everyone's mileage varies and it's not my place to force my opinions on others.
Regarding semi-auto shotguns, I've seen many great rounds of skeet shot beside me with the Beretta AL391 Ulrika. It didn't seem out of place at all next to our O/U guns, and followup speed was never a question.
-M