seriously... why is black badge training so expensive?

Hey I thought Colt45gunner had a whole program figured out for that already!!

Don;t get me started :rolleyes:

If I were you...I'd be looking at it from the perspective of an "Action Shooting" Program

You have material costs that may not be considered by everyone:

Props, Steel etc...it's as asset shared by multiple disciplines. It also has a shelf life and costs to replace or repair

Range time - there has to be something in it for the non action members who are having to give up access to the ranges for IPSC, IDPA, Cowboy, multigun etc...

It's a pretty big list

Most people just count the things they have to pay for right before the match (targets, patches, target stands, timbits)

That's not a very accurate picture of the actual costs to put on the match...
 
If the IDPA guys want to do it for free all the more power to them but the old adage you get what you pay for comes to mind.

Walter I try to avoid these threads that can quickly sink into a we - they situation but this comment is just so much nonsense. I don't know what 4 hour course is being put on at EESA but it isn't the IDPA New Shooter Orientation Course we have developed for club use.

I can tell you too that I have taken the Black Badge Course ($125. + $45. to cover the first Qualifier). In BC you have to shoot a Qualifier without getting DQ'd before you get your Black Badge. Most manage not to get DQ'd, some do. My Black Badge was relatively inexpensive to what has been posted here. It was an excellent course by the way run by a very good instructor - Ed Morris.

The two courses are near identical. The chief difference is the IDPA course spends about four to five hours going over the shooting rules of the sport using a power point presentation. Time spent on the rules is instructor dependent, the size of the class and the amount of time spent in answering individual questions regarding the rules. There is a dry fire session where basic draw techniques are demonstrated and practiced by the students. The dry firing exercises are then followed by range time where several different drills are practiced. Students who demonstrate their abilities to the satisfaction of the instructor are passed. Those that don't, aren't.

My Black Badge course followed essentially the same format with the obvious exception that IPSC rules were covered. We were given ahead of the class an exam paper along with the rule book. We had to look up the answer to the question and quote the applicable rule and page number the rule was located on in the rule book. The "test" had to be completed prior to the course and was marked during the course. The dry fire and range drills were similar.

Like Onegoth I wanted to shoot IPSC and the Black Badge was a prerequisite. Was I happy to pay $125. Yes. Would I have paid $250. for the course. Not even. Following your quoted comment above my reply would be to your fee you charge, "There is another old adage, dealing with the every day occurrence of people being born."

I have not approached Sean with the idea of recognizing our course because our course does not teach IPSC rules and I believe it is important for new shooters of either sport to know the basic rules in order to play. Too, it serves both sports well to have shooters demonstrate on at least one day they have a certain level of competence in handling firearms and handguns in particular.

IDPA has from the beginning been a volunteer sport and none of our instructors receive anything more than their expenses to run our courses by rule, world wide. It works. IPSC has chosen a slightly different path and it works. Please don't confuse the volunteer aspect of IDPA with quality of instruction or the quality of the graduates. I have yet to see any evidence that one group of shooters is any more or less safe than the other.

The cost to shoot IDPA vs IPSC is a wash if you compare IDPA Divisions to IPSC Production and Standard Divisions. Some may argue IPSC Standard Division is slightly more expensive but it need not be. For most shooters an M&P .40cal/Glock 35 will out shoot the talent behind the gun and are about as inexpensive a gun as you can buy. I need three mags to play IDPA and five to play IPSC no big deal. There is no equivalent Open Division in IDPA so it really is unfair to quote this division as being so expensive to shoot.

There are two common aspects of our two sports that drive up the cost of participation:

1. Over the course of a season it isn't the cost of ammo or equipment that is expensive it is the travel costs if you do any amount of shooting. A hundred km trip to an IPSC match costs the same as a hundred km IDPA trip.

2. Ego - In both sports you can spend your brains out on equipmnt and still get your head handed to you by some kid with a Glock 17 or an M&P 9MM sitting in an Uncle Mike's holster wearing a street dress belt and his mags in his back pocket. .:D

Take Care

Bob
 
The second i saw the title of this thread i knew it would be entertaining! lol


to the OP. I stared out with a crappy belt (I still use it!) crappy mag pouches (I still use them!) and a really crappy gun( THAT i've replaced). I started shooting league nights at my local club where they didn't require a BB. I knew nothing, the guys mentored me and took me "under their wings" kicked me in the but a few times and gave me a general idea of what i was doing. After 1 weekend of a BB with walter I was 100% better than when i walked in after an entire summer of "practice" under my belt.

I've only shot 4 qualifiers 2 in standard with my old gun and 2 in production with my Shadow. the 2 production matched I somehow got roped into being the match director for and i managed to come in 3rd in novice for both. I was pretty happy with that.

I'm no super awesome IPSC guru, but i do feel the BB is an excellent course. I learned more in 2 days than I expected, and I never thought I overpaid. Even if ou never shoot a match you'll walk out of the course with lots of extremely useful knowlege and definately a safer shooter.

Course cost-$250
"free"IPSC membership 1 year $70
1st qualifier free $40
2 days lunch/coffee/donuts $40
Books and rules targets lathe $30?
taber range booking fee per person ~$10


Real "profit" for the instructor - $60 and in the case of the taber range, the coin operated air exchange system would also take some of that @$3/hr to run it. I'm sure I'm missing a bunch of costs as well. I know walter generally buys lunch and dinner for his co-instructors as well which eats up (pun definately intended) more of the "profit".

Walter's course probably brings in enough money to buy him and his helpers lunch and dinner both days and if he's lucky may also pay for the gas to and from the range. Honestly I don't feel it's very expensive considering what you get out of it! And you certainly can't expect these guys to be paying out of pocket so that you can gain knowlege from their expertise.
 
Last edited:
You know what is really sad about all of this STORM. Is the fact that i was making a joke.... hence the "JK" and the "in my observation" in my statement.... thats all it was... an observation, not claiming i was the final word on the topic..like many believe they are here. But god forbid I speak of IPDA in a IPSC related forum. In my experience in "TALKING" with IPSC people we shoot with... IPSC does go through more ammo. In conversations i've had with you face to face, you informed me and a new shooter that you could not be competitive in IPSC with a glock, your words..not mine. So although you recommended a shadow to start with...the two are not exactly in the same price range. Once again IPSC being more expensive (even if slightly) because a glock does fine in IDPA. YES you don't need 8 mags to compete. I didn't mean you required them to start shooting IPSC....BUT... from my experience from volunteering and watching IPSC matches...is it really that big of stretch to say the "COMPETITIVE" Ipsc'rs can have 8 mags? Seems like its all just the usual pissing contest going on here.... and now onagoth is getting flamed on cause he dare questioned something about the sacred IPSC pricing. Like seriously guys... opinions and questions are just that...
Call me what will and blast me all you want, God knows i hear enough opinions about you at the club, So im not overly bothered by it. Clearly i don't know sh*t about either one. And ya... better take my confused brain of your BB list. Bravo!!!:rolleyes: Now i'm gonna have a hot bath and a good cry!



What are you smoking?

most people start with a 9mm handgun (same as IDPA) 4 mags (same as IDPA) and a few hundred rounds (same as IDPA)

No worries however..........I will take you off the list of people who wanted a black badge.......we would not want to stress your brain too much . You have to think in BOTH games. In IPSC you just have to shoot FASTER and think FASTER to win. If you just want to shoot and have fun at your own pace you can have fun in both.





Dude............you apparantly do not know s**t about either game.

sad really.



That is an urban myth.......

The suggestion is that you actually know how to shoot a gun and somewhat accurately.

Some people take a year for that..........

Some have been that good in two weeks.

I know one young lady that had 200 rounds through her gun when she took the BB course. that is 200 rounds through ANY handgun in her life! She was competent from the start.




Vest??? Vest??? STFU Newbie............real men wear Hawaiian Shirts!!
 
BB well worth the time & money

Prior to taking the BB I had extensive experience with long guns, but very very very limited with HGs.

During the 2-day BB I learned to efficiently "run" my HG in ways I had no idea were possible. This while moving, from different stances, and with purpose. Almost 500rds in two days. Also got a practical sense of the rules and how the game is played. Also learned a good grip, a decent draw/presentation, and how to shoot straight. The instructor demonstrations and feedback were invaluable. The course progression and pace was just right.

When all was said and done, I took away the above new skills & knowledge plus the safety mindset and habits that help other competitors feel comfortable. These new skills also vaulted me way ahead of all other 'plinker' type handgunners that I'd previously run into at my range.

Stepping up to the plate in my 1st sanctioned match, I was ready. It was far from a dazzling performance, but I was safe. I used the grip taught in the BB and therefore got a lot of As (but slow ones ;) .

The BB was certainly worth the time and money.

edit: the above is intended for new shooters, or those contemplating taking some HG training.
 
Prior to taking the BB I had extensive experience with long guns, but very very very limited with HGs.

During the 2-day BB I learned to efficiently "run" my HG in ways I had no idea were possible. This while moving, from different stances, and with purpose. Almost 500rds in two days. Also got a practical sense of the rules and how the game is played. Also learned a good grip, a decent draw/presentation, and how to shoot straight. The instructor demonstrations and feedback were invaluable. The course progression and pace was just right.

When all was said and done, I took away the above new skills & knowledge plus the safety mindset and habits that help other competitors feel comfortable. These new skills also vaulted me way ahead of all other 'plinker' type handgunners that I'd previously run into at my range.

Stepping up to the plate in my 1st sanctioned match, I was ready. It was far from a dazzling performance, but I was safe. I used the grip taught in the BB and therefore got a lot of As (but slow ones ;) .

The BB was certainly worth the time and money.

If i didn't know you weren't me I'd swear you stole my story! lol I agree with everything you just said AND I have the exact same story as you!
 
Hmmm. That's good. I've a hunch the BB content and methods (National Trg. Program) are -as intended- fairly well standardized across Canada.

This is good in that folk who show up at their first match do not shoot themselve, their RO or the gallery. Since the IDPA folk have a similar safety record, I'll be glad to give their game a whirl when the opportunity comes up.
 
.... and now onagoth is getting flamed on cause he dare questioned something about the sacred IPSC pricing. Like seriously guys... opinions and questions are just that...


I've been flamed way worse than this. Don't worry about me.

This thread is actually mostly civil considering the OP, it hasn't completely derailed....yet.
 
Hmmm. That's good. I've a hunch the BB content and methods (National Trg. Program) are -as intended- fairly well standardized across Canada.

This is good in that folk who show up at their first match do not shoot themselve, their RO or the gallery. Since the IDPA folk have a similar safety record, I'll be glad to give their game a whirl when the opportunity comes up.

The BB is recognized by IDPA so definitely check out a match when you have a chance.

Both sports operate quite differently...but both are a ton of fun.
 
Since I have nothing constructive to add, just an observation:

Onagoth refers to the 2 sports as "IDPA" and "ipsc" instead of "idpa" and "IPSC". :confused:

If there is a rift between IDPA and ipsc at our club I am unaware of it....
...although ipsc vs IDPA threads tend to break down on CGN, most of us do everything we can to support the other.

Hell...I joined ipsc because...
 
Wow this thread went from short to massive quick. After reading all the posts this is what i got.
Aero-plane doesn't like the cost's associated with IPSC or IDPA as apparent by his obsession with ammo amounts, and negative attitude. By the way i run 5 mags.6 on a long cof and don't own 8. If a $200 course is to expensive for some, then shooting much of anything would be out of the question.
 
I'm sitting here giggling after reading this thread. I just spent the weekend in Montreal watching a bunch of new BB students complete their first IPSC Match. some had all the spiffy gear, some had totally budget gear. Every single one of them had a ton of fun.
The course costs money because it's costs money to put it on. As much as I'd like to offer it just for the cost of the years membership, I value my time, and so do the other instructors out there. So honestly if $150-$300 (depending on range costs etc) is too much for you, then yeah, IPSC probally isn't the sport for you. Since you'll be spending far far more than that on ammo, match fees, gas, hotel, and of course, guns, and your 100 mags that some people think you need (when really you could get by, just, on 4). I started the sport using Fobus mag pouches and a leather concealment holster and tactical boots and all that crap. Now I'm one of the sponsored shirt wearing douchebags you see at the range practicing mag dumps.
Did I mention it's a ton of fun?
 
I have been reading this for 2 days now and I just need to make a point, shooting is not the cheapest sport out there! I started 5 years ago and it took me 3 1/2 years befor I could afford my first level 3 match.

The point I am making is take it a bit at a time, don't forget a lot of our costs come from our govt. (hard cases, trigger locks, safes and so on)

I think my black badge was 150 3 yeas ago haven't paid since except for yearly member ship. If you feel the cost is too high get involved become an instructor the more we are the cheaper it becomes.

We are not the USA we need to get more people involved and the prices will go down
 
If there is a rift between IDPA and ipsc at our club I am unaware of it....in general we all support all types of shooting, especially action shooting. :)

Having said that, very rarely does everyone agree on everything, and certainly we all have our opinions...although ipsc vs IDPA threads tend to break down on CGN, most of us do everything we can to support the other.

Hell...I joined ipsc because of east elgin and I've had a great time at our matches.

There only seems to be a rift on the interweb. I've never seen shooters actually have the types of arguements we see here when they are face to face on the range.
 
You know what is really sad about all of this STORM. Is the fact that i was making a joke.... hence the "JK" and the "in my observation" in my statement.... thats all it was... an observation, not claiming i was the final word on the topic.

A Jk is not as effective as an emoticon. Heck they could be your initials..

Your "observations" and the way your relate them to others..........frankly made you out to look like a total FOOL.. its all in the delivery my good man.

.like many believe they are here. But god forbid I speak of IPDA in a IPSC related forum. In my experience in "TALKING" with IPSC people we shoot with... IPSC does go through more ammo.

I WANT MORE AMMO!

I want to SHOOT! I go to matches to SHOOT BULLETS>.......not just to shoot the crap!

If you cannot afford the ammo for an IPSC match.......then you cannot afford the ammo for an IDPA match. Heck you really should look into crochette as a hobby.

In conversations i've had with you face to face, you informed me and a new shooter that you could not be competitive in IPSC with a glock, your words..not mine.

Sigh....No I said that YOU could not be competative with a glock!! Not that people cannot be competative with a glock. To entirely different concepts.

So although you recommended a shadow to start with...the two are not exactly in the same price range. Once again IPSC being more expensive (even if slightly) because a glock does fine in IDPA.

So you are taling what $200 over a shooting carreer?? Rearlly? Damn you better sharpen those needles and gather yarn.

YES you don't need 8 mags to compete. I didn't mean you required them to start shooting IPSC....BUT... from my experience from volunteering and watching IPSC matches...is it really that big of stretch to say the "COMPETITIVE" Ipsc'rs can have 8 mags?

If you are running more than 5 mags on your belt you certainly will not be competative.............for the simple reason YOU MUST SUCK to miss that much to need that much ammo.


Seems like its all just the usual pissing contest going on here...

The only one pissing is you......however I might suggest you turn around. You are facing UPWIND!

. and now onagoth is getting flamed on cause he dare questioned something about the sacred IPSC pricing. Like seriously guys... opinions and questions are just that...

Actually Onagoth is not being flamed.......he is being questioned and there is a civil discussion going on regarding his points.

Call me what will and blast me all you want, God knows i hear enough opinions about you at the club, So im not overly bothered by it.

The election is January 30th 8 pm. You can submit your election Bio to Tim so it can be posted on the website. Or are you all talk? All #####ing? No action?

Clearly i don't know sh*t about either one. And ya... better take my confused brain of your BB list. Bravo!!!:rolleyes: Now i'm gonna have a hot bath and a good cry!

actually I did that when you tried to sell illegal items here on CGN and cried when you lost your EE access. Then CRIED more and more for me to fight to reinstate it for you. Which to my shame I did..........
I really need to be more circumspect as to who I go to bat for.
 
Both sports operate quite differently...but both are a ton of fun.


I thought of a great analogy last night..........

now don't laugh too hard.

IPSC is Freestyle................think of it as jazz or swing dancing. You dance how you want and are graded on that.

IDPA is like Square dancing or country line dancing. Where someone else tells you what to do for each and every step.

Do people like both? Yep.

Are both fun............err well I have never danced jazz or square dancing (waltz man myself) but I do love swing dancing!! But I think that the answer would be yes.

Can you be good at both? Yes

Can you SUCK at Jazz because you do not know how to think freely?
yes

Can you suck at Square dancing because you cannot follow simple instructions? Yes.

In the end all that really matters is that you do not become a wall flower.


Hmmmm now where are my dance shoes!!
 
Back
Top Bottom