Having done extensive scientific testing (NOT!), I find the 'grin per round' factor is much higher with my 10.5" AR (9MM, but also .223), as well as my Swiss Arms CQB, over their longer barreled brethen...
I 'operate' all barrel length versions of both platforms, but on the 'one way ranges' most of us utilize, the 'shorties' are the ones that get packed up, carted, and used.
For most of us, the rationale for longer barrels...higher velocity, bullet fragmentation, etc., are moot points. Less weight, shorter barrels make for more pleasant handling characteristics, and, despite the higher index of 'noise, vibration, and harshness', the shorties win the popularity contest.
Yeah, if I had to depend on my AR/Swiss Arms for actual defense of 'life and country', I would likely opt for 14.5 or 16" variants, but I don't , and so will keep on using, and enjoying, my 'ballistically challenged' shorties.
I 'operate' all barrel length versions of both platforms, but on the 'one way ranges' most of us utilize, the 'shorties' are the ones that get packed up, carted, and used.
For most of us, the rationale for longer barrels...higher velocity, bullet fragmentation, etc., are moot points. Less weight, shorter barrels make for more pleasant handling characteristics, and, despite the higher index of 'noise, vibration, and harshness', the shorties win the popularity contest.
Yeah, if I had to depend on my AR/Swiss Arms for actual defense of 'life and country', I would likely opt for 14.5 or 16" variants, but I don't , and so will keep on using, and enjoying, my 'ballistically challenged' shorties.






















































