The issue isshe's not interested in Bear as table fare. I'll
keep 'working' at it.
Understandable. It is an acquired taste.
I don't agree with that perspective. For 20 years we hosted a family wild game BBQ... with none of the dishes being labelled... the blind testing showed that most people preferred the bear dishes over deer and even moose. For the most part, it is the "thought" of bear meat that taints perceptions.
indeed same experiences as yours ...
444 marlin, nice power without undue recoil. very effective and once again in production.
I have rolled a pile of moose with the .444 marlin and 300 grain Speer SP's. Furthest at almost 200 paces. It is a thumper.
Yikes! That is a bruiser... I have never seen that cartridge, Ted, but over 6K ft/lb energy can do an awful lot.
Edit; a thought just occured to me; I recalled a P.O Ackley quote from a letter he wrote to Bevan King and I am wondering if he was referencing this cartridge?
P.O Ackley to Bevan King;
"If you look through my Volume I book you will find that about 2,800 fps is about all anyone has been able to get out of a .35 caliber 250-grain bullet, regardless of what case is used. So anyone claiming 3,400 is either using some highly specialized system or he is a liar. And I am pretty much of the opinion that the latter is correct.”
I don't agree with that perspective. For 20 years we hosted a family wild game BBQ... with none of the dishes being labelled... the blind testing showed that most people preferred the bear dishes over deer and even moose. For the most part, it is the "thought" of bear meat that taints perceptions.
indeed same experiences as yours ...
Positive comments on Bear, like yours and those of hoytcanon, I've often used to attempt to convince my good lady to 'try' it.I had planned on using my '.366 Wagner' short range thumper on spring Black Bear here on the island IF my convincing efforts proved successful. Results to date, no go
. I'll keep the pressure up but I think my odds in Lotto 649 are a better bet.
I like cartridge flexibility. I say any caliber that offers a light (ish) varmint bullets, high bc pointy ones and some good ol flat based round nose heavy slugs is a good caliber. To my knowledge that puts 6.5mm and 30 cal at the top of my list. Now, handling, I like a short overall length for dense woods hunting, nothing much over 38 inches, the shorter the better. To me, that usually limits me to short action. So, 308, 260 rem, 6.5cm, those can work. I really like the ruger American compact (minus the short LOP) in 308 or perhaps the predator in 308, there’s also the ranch (way to crank out the short barrelled 308’s ruger!). I don’t own any one of those, but I would consider one for a short range thumper. A 308 slinging a 180 grain round nose ought to lay a bit of thump on whatever it hits.
I know I know, then there’s the big bore REAL thumpers, I’m just thinking outside the box a little and a little bit about cartridge flexibility.
Hope you find something that works for you
Johnn, we have discussed this a few times.
I need to bring you some of Phil and Emma's bear bourguignon. C'est magnifique!
Ted
You have a point, there’s an assumption bullet weight means harder hits, I’ve found in my experiences to date that’s not really accurate. What matters is penetration and speed, the holy grail is both and big bullets moving fast enough achieve that with a caveat; recoil.
The slow and heavies (.45-70, .458 Win in 500gr loadings, many of the Nitro Expresses) don’t quite generate the velocity required for radiating tissue damage form the bullet impact (2,200fps at impact). So the little .308 will often be more dramatic in effect, as it does. But push that 250-500gr at 2,400fps and up to reliably arrive at the animal at 2,200, and it’s a game changer. Like a giant .308.
The part of your post I like is folks focus too much on bullet weight, when to be a true “thumper” you need enough speed too.
Hi Ted;
You convinced me some time back. I just showed my Lady all the details and quotes of/in your last post. Her response could be best described as ashudder. HOWEVER,
a challenge. On one of your next visits to the area, using your skills of persuasion...................................
.
You have a point, there’s an assumption bullet weight means harder hits, I’ve found in my experiences to date that’s not really accurate. What matters is penetration and speed, the holy grail is both and big bullets moving fast enough achieve that with a caveat; recoil.
The slow and heavies (.45-70, .458 Win in 500gr loadings, many of the Nitro Expresses) don’t quite generate the velocity required for radiating tissue damage form the bullet impact (2,200fps at impact). So the little .308 will often be more dramatic in effect, as it does. But push that 250-500gr at 2,400fps and up to reliably arrive at the animal at 2,200, and it’s a game changer. Like a giant .308.
The part of your post I like is folks focus too much on bullet weight, when to be a true “thumper” you need enough speed too.
Ted could sell snow cones to Northern Indigenous First Nations Canadians. Your campaign is in good hands.
Ted could sell snow cones to Northern Indigenous First Nations Canadians. Your campaign is in good hands.