Where else can these rifles be found? I've looked and looked.
Well, my SIR SKS showed up today (sorry, no photo yet), and as I was afraid of, it is not as described to me on the phone.
It is a '51 Tula - pretty much identical to the pics in Stiener's first post.
How anyone could not see its a refurb is beyond me - numbers don't match,electro-penciled, stock is stamped 3x for cryin out loud!
Worst of all is the butcher job they did to pin the mag.
I guess for the $$ its still a decent rifle, but since I have two (nicer) others I think this one will be down the road.
im kinda glad they are not unissued cos it would be a shame to have a mag block like that on it.
They do look like they were welded by a blind student on his first day.
Not only that, but the heat from the welding, of course, burnt the finish off the bottom of the mag so they took what looks to be a grinder to it to clean it up, destroying the serial number which they restamped on the side of the mag..So you are now left with a big patch of shiny, unfinished metal on the bottom of the mag.
Very amateurish.
Mine arrived today, refurb and black like the rest except most numbers match.The barrel is not chome-lined. Was it just 1953 without the lining? Maybe, that makes this one really, really rare and worth more than the $232.51 I paid! Any huge offers out there?
Geoff
If it's a 53 the barrel is chrome lined. Your barrel is just painted over during refurb.
I just ran some Hoppe's with a bronze brush and a few patches through it and it still doesn't look like a chrome lining. It was really dirty, so maybe they sprayed that flat black crap down the inside of the barrel as well as the outside. Right now I have a cold and the solvent fumes are driving me nuts, so I'll let it sit for a few days and try again. Thanks for the comments.
Geoff
My 53 does not look chromed either. My other ones have a chrome ring around the inside of the muzzle. The 53 looks like all of my older blued rifles.
I cleaned it up some more today and also looked at the forced serial numbers. I am quite sure the barrel is not chrome-lined and the receiver cover (with the 1953 date) is not the original as it has a serial number newly scribed on the rear surface. So now is it rare and worth lots of money? LOL
Geoff
I cleaned it up some more today and also looked at the forced serial numbers. I am quite sure the barrel is not chrome-lined and the receiver cover (with the 1953 date) is not the original as it has a serial number newly scribed on the rear surface. So now is it rare and worth lots of money? LOL
Geoff