Skinner sights - Anyone have one?

ReverendX

BANNED
CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
101   0   0
Location
Saskatchewan
I'm wanting to order one of these for my Henry Big Boy 357 and was wondering what your opinions of this peep sight are.

I'm thinking it will run a guy around $200.00 after conversion, duty/import fees, and shipping and handling.

What's your opinion on them? Is it worth it?
 
If the OEM sights work for you, you don't need to 'fix' anything, so spending money on a non-existent problem might not be "worth it". If - on the other hand - the OEM sights don't work for you (e.g.: you can't see them and the target at the same time), Skinner sights can fix that, and fixing that problem is most definitely "worth it'.

I highly recommend Skinner sights.

 
Last edited:
I prefer peeps to regular lever action sights; Can see more of the target and they seem faster - more intuitive. If you are a hunter, I think they are superior. For plinking, probably wouldn't spend the money.
 
Have you looked into the Ranger Point Precision receiver sights? They look sharp just like the skinner sights. They also sit lower on the receiver, whereas the Skinner aperture juts out the top. Them sitting lower means you can most likely not need to change out your front sight. They look like they would snap on brush much less than the skinner if your tromping through the bush. Problem is shipping to Canada is as there are no distributors here. Too bad one of the sight sponsors wouldn’t become the Canadian distributor.
 
How to Install a Skinner Peep Sight

Skinner Peep sights are highly recommended for those of you who prefer a full aperture sight. It is recommended that a taller front sight is used and then filed down to get the correct point of impact.

Posted to YouTube on Apr 11, 2017, by Henry Repeating Arms

 
I put one on my Marlin 39a, it’s a great sight. It’s also nice that you can just order online directly from skinner.
 
I recently put one on my Marlin 1893. Great sight.
I think mine set me back about $175.00 with a smaller spare aperture and a tall Patridge sight.
It was MUCH cheaper than a Marbles tang sight and much more comfortable to use, I found.
 
I’ll add: with that receiver sight on my Henry above I made no changes to my front sight. Basically POA at 50 yds with the sight screwed right down.
 
No problem ordering Skinner sights from the States, Andy is great to deal with. I might balk at $200, but with our dollar where it is relative to the USD, its not a surprise.

An aperture receiver sight, particularly when combined with a wide square post front sight, is better than a semi-buckhorn/bead sight arrangement in every way. Its faster since you ignore the rear sight and just put the front sight on the target, then shift you focus to the front sight, rather than attempt to line up the front and rear sight with the target. The sight radius with a receiver sight is longer, so more precise than an open sight mounted mid-barrel. The flat wide top of a rectangular front post is akin to a cross hair, in that the flat top is analogous to the horizontal wire, and the human eye easily discerns the center of the post which is analogous to the vertical wire. A round bead offers no index of elevation, and a bead tends to block out a large amount of the target, leaving so the shooter to guess what the center of the sight covers.
 
Back
Top Bottom