SKS need help , please

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why does this not have a Tula stamped receiver cover? Why was it omitted?


IMG_20150602_181435_695.jpg
 
Ah, but its identical to a letter gun minus serial format. Its a Russian gun that was not assemled at Tula. Why no receiver cover Tula roll stamp?
 
What's identical here? Just receiver sent to brothers in all under heaven. Why is this picture in discussion about letter series? Oh, that was a test? I know nicht, zero, nada about Chinese SKSs.
 
I'd like to chime in and say no one cares about all matching for a 200 CAD$ gun.

As for gun provenance and those details, unless you drank vodka with the old russian dudde working the factory, we will never know for sure...

Also Xbox is way better than playstation. and COD » Battlefield
 
OR4NGE said:
I'd like to chime in and say no one cares about all matching for a 200 CAD$ gun.
Click to expand...


Fair enough.

But the claim is Horilka's 1958 K series carbine is an all-matching/allorginal/non-refurb.

He then offers it up as definitive proof that the Soviets used hardwood stocks on original manufacture. If he cannot prove that it is all matching, he can't prove that it is all original and non refurbed either.

Following that, his rifle provides NO evidence that hardwood stocks were original to 1958 (or 1957 guns).

That is all. An insignificant detail to many, for certain.

But still a debate worth having.
 
Boris Badinov said:
Fair enough.

But the claim is Horilka's 1958 K series carbine is an all-matching/allorginal/non-refurb.

He then offers it up as definitive proof that the Soviets used hardwood stocks on original manufacture. If he cannot prove that it is all matching, he can't prove that it is all original and non refurbed either.

Following that, his rifle provides NO evidence that hardwood stocks were original to 1958 (or 1957 guns).

That is all. An insignificant detail to many, for certain.

But still a debate worth having.
Click to expand...

I have some all matching non refurb 1957’s that are hardwood.

So they did use them, idk where your getting this “laminate only” consensus.
 
pcvando said:
I have some all matching non refurb 1957’s that are hardwood.

So they did use them, idk where your getting this “laminate only” consensus.
Click to expand...

Laminate only on ORIGINAL guns is the claim I'm making.

Where have you posted the photos of your all matching, non-refurbs with all of the serials. Would be great if you could proved me wrong.


Convince me. Show what you got.
 
For the record, I don't care if its laminated or hardwood. That Tula stamp is wrong duck dong.

Simple question... Who/where is it that would be stamping Tula on a gun?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom