- Location
- On the edge of an "Inland Sea"
Side focus????
I hope your not referring to the parallax adjustment as a foucs adjustment. If I'm misunderstanding you please dissregard. Don't think I'm being a #### but that is what I understood from your statement.
Skullboy said:I have never hear any issues with the Leupold MK4 side focus and I have used these scopes for years.
People have to remember that the TRUE MK4s are the fixed power models (10X M3/M1 & the M1 16X) made for Military use.The MK4 Precision Rifle line is not in the same league for ruggedness.
Bushnell does make so nice optics, but nowhere near the quality of the MK4, Nightforce, or S&B line.
The Bushnell 3200 10X MilDot is the best value in a MilDot lower end tatcical scope.
That B&L #1040 10X MilDot scope was AWESOME. I had one when the first came out and regretfully sold it to my buddy who won't sell it back to me.I liked it better then any of the Leupy MK4s I have.
I have had hands on with Nightforce,U.S. Optics, & Swarvoski.For my eyes, the S&B PM-II wins hands down.Although I would have no problem buying a Nightforce or U.S. Optics scope.
The IOR scopes I have seen have not impressed me with the Phillips screw head hardware on the turrets (Don't know if they have changed that or not). Plus I did not like how some of the reticles adjusted in the different models (the 4X line).The reticle doesn't stay centered in the FOV when zero'd.The IOR I tried out had the reticle up and over to the left side of the FOV when zero'd.It shot where it was supposed to, but I just couldn't get used to that sight picture.
Jamie, if you get out this way you can try ou the MIGHTY S&B.![]()
![]()
SKBY.
I hope your not referring to the parallax adjustment as a foucs adjustment. If I'm misunderstanding you please dissregard. Don't think I'm being a #### but that is what I understood from your statement.