Some advice/help in reloading for a MkI Webley in MkII .455 Webley

krprice84

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
97   0   0
Location
Calgary, Alberta
So I'd like some help figuring this out here. I've done hours and hours of research trying to figure this out, and I can't quite figure out where I might be going wrong, and if I can possibly load a little hotter.

First off, I'd like to state that I'm aware of the risks and the safety procedures for loading these cartridges with smokeless. The MkII cartridges were originally Cordite-loaded, and the factory Fiocchi ammo is loaded with smokeless to the best of my knowledge. I have read the threads about reloading BP rounds with smokeless and, while this may not exactly apply, I understand that some may be apprehensive about loading these cartridges with smokeless, but I'm ok with it. Please don't turn this thread into a thread about smokeless vs. black, I just want some help/advice here on getting these things shooting better.

So basically what I've done is I got some Hornady .454 Cowboy bullets, 255 grain, Soft lead, flat point, with the knurled sides. I made up 50 rounds with Trailboss, 50 with Unique, and 50 with Bullseye. Did between 6 and 12 cartridges each with differing amounts of powder. I started at the recommended minimum, or maybe 0.1 grains above that (started with 3.3 grains of Bullseye, 3.9 grains of Unique, and 2.4 grains of Trailboss).

The Trailboss minimum weight was determined using the method on the IMR website (basically determine the bullet seating depth, fill to that level, weigh the powder and get the maximum recommended load, then take 70% of that as the minimum/starting weight. This gave 2.45 grains or so). I made up the Trailboss rounds with 2.4, 2.6, 2.9, 3.2, and 3.4 grains of powder behind the 255 grain bullets.

The Unique and Bullseye loads were taken from the Lee dies sheet that came with the dies, and the Bullseye was cross referenced to a photo of a page out of an old manual I found at the gun show (the guy let me just take a photo as I didn't want/need the whole thing and he said he'd prefer I take a photo if I'm not buying it as a collectors thing and just want the data). Bullseye started at 3.3 grains and worked up by 0.1 grains up to 3.8 maximum. The Unique started at 3.9 grains (0.1 over the minimum starting load) and worked up to 4.3 (0.1 under the maximum, I think - it might have been the max recommended load).

The bullet seating depth/COAL was determined mostly by measuring the cartridges that a guy gave me with the Webley when I bought it, that he had reloaded. I didn't think that the Fiochhi factory rounds would be a good one to look at, as they are hollow base and are more of a pointed round nose, so I couldn't easily determine the insertion depth from that, and I don't yet have a bullet puller. I figured that 0.257" or so of insertion would be a good starting place, as it would make rounds about 0.05" longer than the ones I was given, but still about 0.1" shorter than the Fiochhi and than the Lee dies manual says. The Lee manual uses a 265 grain bullet though, and it is a round nose bullet there too. Trying to load for the Fiocchi size, or the Lee size, would give me an insertion of less than 0.125" which I wasn't comfortable with; it just didn't look like it would be inserted enough, and a whole lot of the flat side of the bullet was still showing.

On firing these rounds I found that the lowest two loads were REALLY light, in fact, far too light. The next ones up to the max I loaded were all decent, with the max ones *feeling* similar in felt recoil to the factory Fiocchi ammo (10 grains heavier bullets) but maybe a little lighter. Obviously not a great way to determine loads but I don't have a chrono yet.

My biggest issue though, was that the rounds were not accurate. They also didn't seem to hit very hard. We had some computer hard drives out there that needed to have their data destroyed (private farm, not a range, don't worry, not making a mess out of other peoples ranges/properties) so we set them up. Most of the rounds I shot did not go through the hard drives all the way, and the lighter ones only dented the steel case of the hard drives. The third steps and higher would penetrate but not go through and through (given, there are 4-5 steel platters inside, plus a spindle, so that's a lot to ask out of a lead bullet).

Regarding accuracy, I was shooting groups of between 5-7 inches, offhand, with the factory ammo. I'm pretty new to pistols, so I consider that decent for sure. Those are groups of 6, and yes, there was the odd flyer but usually I would feel that they were my fault. With the reloads, I could get about 6-8 inches, but with almost every group there would be one or two flyers, usually off to the left, and sometimes by as much as 10-12 inches! Given, some of those could have been my own fault, but my goodness, they all couldn't have been (plus with factory ammo I was shooting much better).

I also tried some harder lead bullets made for 45 colt (so 2 thousandths under the other bullets diameter - .452") which were 265 grain SWC bullets. They had one lube groove and had a place for a crimp, it looks like. They are much, much longer than the 255 grain bullets, so I seated to the same depth and had a COAL of very close to the factory Fiocchi ammo. These ones were, I would say, similar in accuracy to the other reloads, but maybe with a couple more flyers, but not many.

All rounds were roll crimped at the same time as bullet seating, and were roll crimped to match the factory ammo crimps. The 255 grain bullets were knurled, which I'm told allows them to be roll crimped without issue. The harder lead ones do have what I think is a cannellure for crimping, but I did not seat them QUITE that far. The very edge of the case was JUST starting to get to the cannellure. My concern with seating them deeper is, I don't know how deep I can go before case volume is reduced a significant amount and before I cause pressures to spike.

None of the cases/primers showed ANY signs of excess pressure - all primers were nice and round still, cases all looked to be in just fine condition and extracted just fine. Headstamp/base was fine. No issues. I want to try to load them a little hotter, but wanted to find out what people thought first. Since the Webley pressure levels are pretty low (11,000-13,000 PSI) I can't imagine that i'd see flattened primers or very many other signs of excess pressure, even if they were a little hot, would I? I mean if a 45ACP round can be loaded to 19,000 PSI and show none of that, I can't imagine that the primers would flatten out in a Webley round even at 16,000 PSI, which is far too hot for my liking.

So is the only way to reliably tell if I can load hotter to simply shoot over a chrono and determine velocity, or am I able to figure it out another way?

Is it ALWAYS a bad idea to exceed the max loads, even if the velocity is lower than spec and if there are no signs of excess pressure? I.e. if I load with 4.3 grains of Unique and find that I'm moving at 550-600 FPS and no signs of pressure, could I work up to 4.5-4.6 and get closer to factory velocity, or is that a really stupid idea that could blow up my gun? I just would like to get a little better penetration if possible. Also there was very little deformation of the bullets. I'd say they expanded by maybe 3/16" total, some of them maybe by 1/4" total. That works out to be 40-50% expansion... is that good?

Finally, any recommendations on increasing accuracy?

Thanks all!
 
We are in a similar position to you, as we want to load for a Mk. 1 Webley and have a Mk. ll for loading up first.
We have a couple boxes of Fiocchi cal. .455, 262 grain bullet, but it doesn't state on the box if the bullets are flat base, or hollow.
In a Mk.ll Webley three cartridges from the Fiocchi box chronoed at 526, 519 and 560.
They actually felt like a pretty good whump and if we had not had a chronograph we would have guessed at them being higher velocity than that.
We have not loaded any yet, as we have not decided on a bullet. We would like to get either a hollow base mold, or some hollow base bullets.
If you get any loads chronographed we would like to hear of the results.
There is no way to determine by examining the brass, whether your loads, especially in a non magnum revolver, have excessive pressure. And yes, it is a very bad idea to load a revolver heavier than stated in a reputable loading chart. A chronograph is very useful to see what they are doing, but I would not load heavier than the velocity stated in the book.
A revolver can shoot 120 factory rounds that really shouldn't have been shot in that particular revolver just fine, with no sign of trouble, then number 121 can blow up the cylinder. And please don't ask me how I know this!
Please keep us posted on how you do.
Bruce
 
We are in a similar position to you, as we want to load for a Mk. 1 Webley and have a Mk. ll for loading up first.
We have a couple boxes of Fiocchi cal. .455, 262 grain bullet, but it doesn't state on the box if the bullets are flat base, or hollow.
In a Mk.ll Webley three cartridges from the Fiocchi box chronoed at 526, 519 and 560.
They actually felt like a pretty good whump and if we had not had a chronograph we would have guessed at them being higher velocity than that.
We have not loaded any yet, as we have not decided on a bullet. We would like to get either a hollow base mold, or some hollow base bullets.
If you get any loads chronographed we would like to hear of the results.
There is no way to determine by examining the brass, whether your loads, especially in a non magnum revolver, have excessive pressure. And yes, it is a very bad idea to load a revolver heavier than stated in a reputable loading chart. A chronograph is very useful to see what they are doing, but I would not load heavier than the velocity stated in the book.
A revolver can shoot 120 factory rounds that really shouldn't have been shot in that particular revolver just fine, with no sign of trouble, then number 121 can blow up the cylinder. And please don't ask me how I know this!
Please keep us posted on how you do.
Bruce

First, what I meant by MkII was that the cartridges are the MkII .455 Webley. There are six marks of .455 Webley ammo. The first one is a longer casing, I think it's getting close to an inch long. All the other (later) marks are 0.750" long trim length. Hence why i felt it was important to point that out. But my revolver is a Mark I.

I'll tell you what I know so far. First, the Fiocchi ammo IS hollow based. I found half a bullet in my targets yesterday (after blowing off almost 200 rounds through my gun, mostly reloads) and it was definitely a hollow base bullet.

Hollow base is also what the original factory load was in these - 265 grain though from what I know. The bullets I've reloaded with are flat based, so I can imagine that they maybe aren't perfect, but then again, my bore is not larger than the bullet is to begin with. I can see on a bullet that i've recovered that it definitely sealed. I can see a bit of powder marking on one rifling groove but it's very faint and barely there. So i think that the hollow base thing is, maybe, a bonus? I think I'm going to be buying a chrono soon here though - i need to determine what my loads are shooting at before I load up a bunch of one loading. Funny thing about the Fiocchi ammo though - they say 850 FPS on the box - that HAS to be a mistake, even though they've had it printed like that for years. There is not one person I've heard of who's chrono'd their Fiocchi factory ammo at anywhere near that. It seems most often that it goes out around 600-650, so yours definitely seem a little low. How long is the barrel on your Webley? My barrel is the standard 4" barrel, not a less common snub'd one and, sadly, not the longer target one.

I would suggest talking to Jethunter (on this forum) as he makes/has bullets for the Webley. He can't ship any until June as he is out of the country though. For now, I would suggest getting some of the Hornady 0.454 Cowboy bullets, as they are made of dead soft lead. They are a little pricier than other bullets though, at about 50 bucks for a box of 200. The other option, which I also got, are 45LC bullets, which are 0.002" undersized from what is called for as a "factory" bullet diameter. Does it matter? I'm not totally sure, but I'll know more as I work up my loads with a chrono and spend some more time actually testing things out. I have to print out some targets to use as store bought ones are too expensive to use for my liking. Any more than two cylinders and you can't see where you're hitting, and even more than one it becomes hard to remember unless you go mark it up each time. Personally I think that the 45LC SWC 265 grain (or even 230/240 grain) are great for what we're looking for. The bigger ones would be nice to have in the gun if you ever had to fire it in self defense at a dangerous animal though.

So as far as loading for it, would you suggest that, if i find that I am not coming near the stated velocity in my revolver for the load, should I still stay below that? I assume so, as it would likely not be bad data that's causing it? The biggest reason i ask about this is i've seen LOTS of guys using 4.5-4.8 grains of Unique in their Webley's and have had no problems over hundreds and hundreds of loads. That's 0.2-0.5 grains over the maximum stated load for this cartridge. I'm not sure why but it seems very common for guys to exceed the maximum by a few points of a grain on these guns - maybe it's because it's such a small load to begin with? I'm not hoping for more than 700 fps really, but I know that the factory loads would head out at between 650 and 700 FPS, which is really all I want out of it.

I will post back when I have more info - please do the same if you get any. I just need to get a chrono and some more time and i'll be trying this out again, but this time not with the lowest two loads as they were useless for everything but handing the gun to my 5 year old and letting her try it... the kick was lighter than a 22LR!
 
Hi. I can't tell you a whole lot about the Mk. I Webley, I load for a Mk. VI - a whole 'nother ball of wax.

First, I'm led to believe that all .455 Webleys were bored with a 0.442" drill, then rifled 0.004", so the bore size is 0.450" on all of them. Again, I don't have this as gospel - it's just what I read, and you should slug your barrel to be sure. I shoot exclusively lead with the Mk. VI and I size them all 0.450" - and on a good day it'll put at least some of them through the same hole. You can see a pic' of mine on p. 24 in the "good looking gun" thread in 'pistols and revolvers', along with some of the ammo I shoot through it.

Mine loves heavy bullets. I fed it exclusively 255gr Lyman #452424 LSWC's, but they took too long to make through a 2-cavity mould so I've also fed it 200gr LSWC's (Saeco mould), 230gr TC's and 255gr RF's (both Lee 6-cavity moulds). None of my .45's likes the 200gr LSWC's, and if you don't make your own bullets but want to, I recommend the Lee 230gr TC - you only get 28 255gr's per pound of lead. Buying your bullets costs more, but saves so much time and hassle I find myself really recommending it even though I make all mine; the guys at the club swear-by DRG's.

Trail Boss is what I feed all the 45's; been back in shooting for a year and I discover I've emptied 3 bottles of it so far. I've shot the Mk.VI with a load as low as 2.7gr but I don't recommend this; the chrono showed an extreme velocity variance. My standard load was 2.9gr for quite awhile and the older .45 ACP autoloader would cycle it with 255gr bullets, but it's a dirty powder ("flaming dirt") at such low loadings so I settled-on 3.2gr. When I switched to the 230gr TC I upped the powder load to 3.5gr, just to keep the pistols cleaner; and the 230gr TC with 3.5gr Trail Boss are my current standard loads. I use it in .455 Mk. II cases for the Webley, and in .45 ACP cases for the autoloaders - and for the Webley as well, I bought a shaven cylinder on eBay and load it with moon clips to compete in PP at our club. I won't load anything hotter in .45 ACP, because I'm worried about a hot .45 ACP load finding its way into the Webley and blowing it up.

- And that's my main warning to you. Everything I've read insists the Mk. VI had the best metallurgy and manufacturing techniques of the entire .455 line, and even then you don't want to push them. So take it very easy on your Mk. I's, please!!!

P.S. Latest chronographs through a .45 ACP with 255gr Lee RF and 3.5gr TB were 653 f/s; the Mk. VI (with 6" barrel) shoots a bit slower because of the flash gap.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom