Gatehouse, you do make a good point and A+ effort to gather and post all that info.
Just seems to me that this "glitch" with the Siberian firing pin would have been showing up in the company's own research and development.
Seems odd that they didn't catch and fix this glitch prior to releasing rifles to the market and yes..... it is a damn good thing no one got hurt.
I've never owned a firearm that suffered a glitch, recall or exploding bolt/carrier so I guess I am lucky. LOL
My posts should not be perceived as me having a hate on for these rifles or the other 180 platforms. I genuinely hoped that the launch of all these guns would be smooth ..... because they are made in Canada. However it seems that there are a lot of little glitches and issues needing to be addressed by the end user that should have.... and would have.... shown up in these various company's own testing.
To me it is forcing the end user to pay for something that is really not ready for market and the end user is the beta tester. Just one man's opinion so not worth much in the grand scheme of things. Just seems like this type of behavior has become acceptable in the Canadian firearms community and I find that strange. I'm not paying for one of these rifles until there are no glitches or quirks being reported. I just want to hear about safety, reliability and accuracy because when this gets scaled up to 7.62 I want to be one of the first in line hehehe
Just seems to me that this "glitch" with the Siberian firing pin would have been showing up in the company's own research and development.
Seems odd that they didn't catch and fix this glitch prior to releasing rifles to the market and yes..... it is a damn good thing no one got hurt.
I've never owned a firearm that suffered a glitch, recall or exploding bolt/carrier so I guess I am lucky. LOL
My posts should not be perceived as me having a hate on for these rifles or the other 180 platforms. I genuinely hoped that the launch of all these guns would be smooth ..... because they are made in Canada. However it seems that there are a lot of little glitches and issues needing to be addressed by the end user that should have.... and would have.... shown up in these various company's own testing.
To me it is forcing the end user to pay for something that is really not ready for market and the end user is the beta tester. Just one man's opinion so not worth much in the grand scheme of things. Just seems like this type of behavior has become acceptable in the Canadian firearms community and I find that strange. I'm not paying for one of these rifles until there are no glitches or quirks being reported. I just want to hear about safety, reliability and accuracy because when this gets scaled up to 7.62 I want to be one of the first in line hehehe