Stevens mag calibres

Savage did get some extractors from one of their suppliers a while back that didn't work 100%, some had troubles most didn't. Call Savage saying you need a new extractor and all they ask is your serial number and address, and it's in the mail right away.

Push the old one out, slide the new one in, all is good.

Lots of other manufacturers would insist on it being sent to an authorized warranty center before they will even decide if they will cover it.
 
cariboo_kid said:
Savage did get some extractors from one of their suppliers a while back that didn't work 100%, some had troubles most didn't. Call Savage saying you need a new extractor and all they ask is your serial number and address, and it's in the mail right away.

Push the old one out, slide the new one in, all is good.

Lots of other manufacturers would insist on it being sent to an authorized warranty center before they will even decide if they will cover it.
Click to expand...


Already did that, fixed one. Second one had to be sent back for other work. No longer own any Stevens, there are just too many better choices for a couple hundred bucks extra with much better fit and finish...
 
Another option to consider if you are set on the 300winmag but concerned about recoil is to get the Savage "AK" version, which is stainless with accutrigger and a muzzle break that can be turned on or off to suit your needs.
 
I have both Stevens and Savage hunting rifles. Personally, tuned up and shot a 270, 308, 7RM (also 223). All shot around 1/2MOA out to 200yds. Big issue is the light weight which causes them to bounce. Not ideal for best grouping but who cares, more then enough accuracy to drop any game.

My 7RM wears a brake. I can spot my own shots from 300yds on out.

I have yet to have any issues with feeding or extraction.

Certainly not the smoothest bolt lift but its an easy job to smooth up. The Stevens trigger make excellent hunting weight pulls (2.5 to 3lbs). Overtravel can be adjusted out. They break cleanly.

I prefer the Accutrigger and my hunting rifle is a Savage in 308 center feed dmag. I am not a fan of the blind mag for a hunting rifle.

Like any other factory light contoured barrel, they overheat quickly and will walk. I limit my testing to 3rds then let it cool.

Jerry
 
pharaoh2 said:
how do you figure it's not as reliable as a $3000 rifle? Have you ever had one not go boom? I doubt it. That just tells me you have far more expendable income than I do. And for that I'm glad for you. If I had the extra cash I too may think different, but alas I do not. Therefore, I have to make smart decisions. :p
Click to expand...

Nothing wrong with the Stevens, the are an excellent rifle for the price, but off the top of my head, here is where they differ form a higher grade rifle:

They aren't smooth operating, the magazine is blind, the safety is hard to move with gloves on and it's loud, feeding and extraction/ejection isn't 100%, the bolt release is a metal flange thing that gets hung up on clothing, the triggerguard is plastic, the blueing leaves much to be desired, the buttpad is a hockey puck, the trigger is scratchy, the hollow tupperware stock is loud...

I am sure they can be tuned up as much as any other Savage, and I am sure that the will serve 95% of the hunters out there, but I am not going to take a Stevens on a remote backcountry hunting trip. I'll be happy to scratch up that expensive rifle.;)
:evil:
 
They aren't smooth operating, the magazine is blind, the safety is hard to move with gloves on and it's loud, feeding and extraction/ejection isn't 100%, the bolt release is a metal flange thing that gets hung up on clothing, the triggerguard is plastic, the blueing leaves much to be desired, the buttpad is a hockey puck, the trigger is scratchy, the hollow tupperware stock is loud...
Click to expand...

Just what I like in a hunting rifle!:D Just a quick note. I don't know if the early models had it, but the stocks have a foam filler in the. They don't sound like a drum anymore.
 
I have one in 25-06,and it is a very nice shooter.I have shot one in 300 mag and I would much rather shoot my 375 H&H than that one.It did have rather objectionable recoil.
 
pharaoh2 said:
1 Steven's rifle in the chambering of your choice and one nice Leupold VX2 = 1 Tikka syn/blued in caliber of your choice. (Same fit and finish :D)
Click to expand...


Not even close to the same quality...... If you can buy a new stevens and a new vx-ll for 649.00 let me know.... At least if you are buying a Savage buy something with the accutrigger or the American classic...

You pay for a 330 dollar rifle, you get the quality of a 330 dollar rifle...a poor quality stock, you have to file down the checkering so you don't cut yourself on it because they didn't bother cleaning it up after taking it out of the mold. They in no way compare to 600-800 dollar rifle... Vanguards, Tikkas, Remingtons, Rugers, etc. etc....

I had 4 Stevens, would not be interested in another, as a beater rifle they are fine, but they are not equal to a quality rifle......
 
Last edited:
Come on. This is the best value in a hunting rifle out there right now. You are saying that the quality isn't there. Why? The rifle shoots like it's supposed to, the stock holds the barreled action in place, it goes boom and you've got venison. You say get a Savage. IT IS A SAVAGE! It is the same rifle, with the same style of trigger we have been using for the last couple centuries. If it held up this long, what makes it inferior now? The accu-trigger is a good idea, but not necessary. So the bluing isn't as fancy as a Weatherby. Who cares? It will still shoot as good if not better than rifles costing many times the amount. The stock is fine. I've read the same article too, and my stocks don't have razor sharp edges on them. I have nothing against nice rifles, but you cannot compare the value the 200 has to anything else. Accuracy and pure function should come before beauty. If someone asks me what rifle I would recommend, you know what I'm going to say. And I am a proud owner of these great buys.
 
pharaoh2 said:
. Accuracy and pure function should come before beauty. .
Click to expand...

I agree, and have come to the conclusion that Stevens rifles, while very good value, do not function as well as several other rifles. They function just as good as some, not as good as others.
 
pharaoh2 said:
Come on. This is the best value in a hunting rifle out there right now. You are saying that the quality isn't there. Why? The rifle shoots like it's supposed to, the stock holds the barreled action in place, it goes boom and you've got venison. You say get a Savage. IT IS A SAVAGE! It is the same rifle, with the same style of trigger we have been using for the last couple centuries. If it held up this long, what makes it inferior now? The accu-trigger is a good idea, but not necessary. So the bluing isn't as fancy as a Weatherby. Who cares? It will still shoot as good if not better than rifles costing many times the amount. The stock is fine. I've read the same article too, and my stocks don't have razor sharp edges on them. I have nothing against nice rifles, but you cannot compare the value the 200 has to anything else. Accuracy and pure function should come before beauty. If someone asks me what rifle I would recommend, you know what I'm going to say. And I am a proud owner of these great buys.
Click to expand...


So by your arguement, you should be hunting with a Tasco scope and not a Leupold.. both will put the bullet on target and bring home the venison... So what if the lenses are crappy, they both still function.... and you cannot compare the value to anythng else!


There is a huge difference in quality between the stevens and a American classic, their top of the line. You should really try and take out some better quality rifles, the difference will become quite apparent..
 
I will say for under $400 it is not really possible to beat a Stevens 200

If you can scrape up another $200, there is a few models that are better choices, and a $600 used rifle is usually pretty good quality. Take back some beer cans or something
 
mylesrom said:
So by your arguement, you should be hunting with a Tasco scope and not a Leupold.. both will put the bullet on target and bring home the venison... So what if the lenses are crappy, they both still function.... and you cannot compare the value to anythng else!


There is a huge difference in quality between the stevens and a American classic, their top of the line. You should really try and take out some better quality rifles, the difference will become quite apparent..
Click to expand...


I never said that. Were talking rifles, not scopes. Most rifles are capable of delivering accurate shots. But the shots cannot be placed with poor quaity optics. I never said, so don't put words into my mouth. And for the record, I do own a couple of Tasco scopes. They did build some good stuff. Remember the Titan? Irregardles, I have a pair of World class rimfires on two of my .22 rifles, and I bet there's not many rifle/scope combo's that will shoot any better than these.
 
pharaoh2 said:
I never said that. Were talking rifles, not scopes. Most rifles are capable of delivering accurate shots. But the shots cannot be placed with poor quaity optics. I never said, so don't put words into my mouth. And for the record, I do own a couple of Tasco scopes. They did build some good stuff. Remember the Titan? Irregardles, I have a pair of World class rimfires on two of my .22 rifles, and I bet there's not many rifle/scope combo's that will shoot any better than these.
Click to expand...


I have 100 dollar bushnell banners that I regulary shoot submoa on various rifles, so yes they are submoa capable, but in no way do they compare to the optics on my Leupolds for clarity, brightness or quality.

You get what you pay for, that goes for both rifles and scopes.
 
I think rather than Tasco a more fair comparison in the scope market would be the Mueller line. known for performing well above the expectations of their price bracket. Made in the same factories using the same materials and technology as brand name units costing much more.

I think Tod's last post is pretty accurate - nothing on the market compares to the performance of the Stevens 200 in this price range. If you wait, you can find some very nice used rifles at twice the price, also true.

As far as the trigger goes, the stevens trigger is fine for a hunting rifle, and the accutrigger is very nice for a factory trigger. But for someone that wants a really nice trigger, they don't usually get it out of the box.

Remmy shooters either upgrade or pay for a trigger job as do many other brands. The Stevens is the same. Aftermarket triggers put it into the real high performance level, such as the SSS or rifle basix.

Add one of these triggers for $125, spend an afternoon or evening cleaning up the stock and bedding it, and you have a rifle capable of long range competition - yet you still haven't approached the price of a Tikka.

I'm not saying it's the best rifle ever built. I'm saying it's the best value out there, and I'd rather have several Stevens' than one Tikka. In fact I made that exact choice this winter.

When the Stevens first hit the market I was put off by the color of the stock, yet research showed me it was the smart investment so I bought one of the first batch. You know where the bias against the looks came from? It was the same color as a POS that Remmy was flogging. :rolleyes:
 
i bought one in novemeber * a stevens in .300* yes the stoc kis ugly , wit ha little bondo and paint it looked decent. yes as factory it is quite the thumper, but add some lead to the foreend and butt cavity and agood pad and it is quite comfortable. i am managing 1 MOA 3 shot groups consectivly and when i take my time i can get my 3 shot groups to touch *at 100yds . it wears a tascoo 6-24x40 AO.
i have since swaped the factory stock for a Choate ultimate sniper stock and find it very soothing to shoot all day with little to no discomfort. i have a 28" pac-nor barrel inbound for it straight taper from the standard shank to .930 at the muzzle, which will be threaded for a break to be installed. i will be putting a merlin 10x42T scope on it once the barrel has been paid for
 
Sounds very nice. I wish you lived closer so I could play with your rifle (longarm, bangstick - dang it, I can't find a way to say that which sounds heterosexual!) ;) while you play with Mrs. SignGuy. :D

Actually to heck with that, why don't YOU go to the range and she and I will see what pops up in conversation? :p

Oh... my wife says the "D" word is guaranteed to come up. :redface: :redface:
 
cariboo_kid said:
Actually to heck with that, why don't YOU go to the range and she and I will see what pops up in conversation? :p

Oh... my wife says the "D" word is guaranteed to come up. :redface: :redface:
Click to expand...
LOL there are several words that might come up some even start with D

lol just remeber my wife can shoot better then i can LOL
 
cariboo_kid said:
I think rather than Tasco a more fair comparison in the scope market would be the Mueller line. known for performing well above the expectations of their price bracket. Made in the same factories using the same materials and technology as brand name units costing much more.

I think Tod's last post is pretty accurate - nothing on the market compares to the performance of the Stevens 200 in this price range. If you wait, you can find some very nice used rifles at twice the price, also true.

As far as the trigger goes, the stevens trigger is fine for a hunting rifle, and the accutrigger is very nice for a factory trigger. But for someone that wants a really nice trigger, they don't usually get it out of the box.

Remmy shooters either upgrade or pay for a trigger job as do many other brands. The Stevens is the same. Aftermarket triggers put it into the real high performance level, such as the SSS or rifle basix.

Add one of these triggers for $125, spend an afternoon or evening cleaning up the stock and bedding it, and you have a rifle capable of long range competition - yet you still haven't approached the price of a Tikka.

I'm not saying it's the best rifle ever built. I'm saying it's the best value out there, and I'd rather have several Stevens' than one Tikka. In fact I made that exact choice this winter.

When the Stevens first hit the market I was put off by the color of the stock, yet research showed me it was the smart investment so I bought one of the first batch. You know where the bias against the looks came from? It was the same color as a POS that Remmy was flogging. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

My tikka in 30-06 will do anything several of your stevens will do and better! Heres my 8 shot group 100 yards.

DSC00184.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom