With your take on the strength of the '86 action and I believe the 71 was an upgrade of the '86, how would you say the strength of the 71 stacks up? And the next improvement to the '71 being some of the most recently produced copies, with upgrade/improvements in metallurgy, where would you say they fit in strength wise?
I remember reading an article about Harold Johnson the man responsible for the 450 and 50 Alaskan and in it he said the '86 and M71 were more or less equal strength-wise and in spite of the fact that he converted many M71s, he actually preferred the later 1886 because they had a very slightly different taper at the top of the locking lugs and were less prone to popping open after firing.
Personally I've never desired to load any of mine to the level that might cause that...




























personally enough recoil for me





















