I agree. You can't paint a manufacturer with a broad brush especially when they use different design philosophies for different models. The RFB is such a completely different gun to the KSG or SU-16 and can't be compared.
Agree'd, I've owned the RFB, KSG, and Sub2000 and I thought the RFB and KSG were great firearms but the Sub2000 felt cheap, it was reliable and accurate but just felt cheap. They sell firearms to fill market voids and they do it well, just don't buy a $600 folding plastic toy and expect it to be battle ready.
Don't forget, a lot of people liked to call the AR-180B vastly overpriced, and an $600 rifle at $1,400 prices.
I own 2, and love 'em both, but I know what people say.
I should have never sold mine, some day I'll buy it back from my buddy. He's enjoying it too much to take it from him though when I have so many other toys.
I love how people go on about the reciever cracking.... Anyone else remember the HK SL8 having the same issue?
I do.
Put it this way, do your research, handle the firearm yourself, and see what you think.
I remember clearly, I had one of the first SL8-4's in Canada and had the lower crack, it was replaced under warranty then the replacement cracked after 400 rounds. I got the third lower and sold it with a warning to the new owner.
I recently had a newer model that was modded heavily and it was fantastic, shot great with quality ammo and was very ergonomic with the HERA gen 2 lower and ACR folding stock.
Last edited:




















































