Suppressors are illegal in Canada

Dukester said:

My issued one was semi, 3 rnd burst or FA. hush puppies.

Don't want the baddies to have them.
Click to expand...
Odd thing about criminals , they don't obey the laws you are supposed to enforce. Sort of whatever they want they get , the laws only affect those members of the country that abide by them. Meanwhile the police arm up in a manner similar to the military. Not a bad country here but lots of room for improvement.
 
rajczak_kashka said:
A suppressor is simply a muffler for a gun. Same as a car. No more, no less. Basically ,hearing protection. Politics and Hollywood to thank for them not being allowed in this f@cked up country.
Click to expand...

Bfranklin said:
Flawed logic.

Baddies will do what baddies will do.
Click to expand...
^^^ The government agent who made that stupid comment, who was bragging that he had taxpayer funded, suppressed full auto is a jerk.

The baddies are the one and only problem. It is never guns.
He wants to continue the delusion he and his friends are elite and special, far above the common citizen.
 
guysavard said:
My buddy looks over at me as I’m firing away with my Bren 2 and I was wondering what the issue was. I hand him my Bren to let him fire a few mags and I couldn’t believe how concussive it was lol. Sure would be nice to be able to somewhat tame our guns for everyone’s sake. And that was only a little 223 round. I can still hear ringing from a friends 300 win mag.
Click to expand...
Well what's on the muzzle of the bren? Caliber and barrel length? Muzzle brakes absolutely suck to be around.
 
Last edited:
Cocked&Locked said:
The baddies are the one and only problem. It is never guns.
He wants to continue the delusion he and his friends are elite and special, far above the common citizen.
Click to expand...
I do not agree with this, personally. I believe firmly that the one and only problem is the lack of consequence. I have bent some rules in my day but if we had the freedom to choose suppressors and barrel length restrictions, etc, I would walk the line. I would accept that bending the rules would result in a loss of privileges and real consequence. Consequences after action; not prohibition before.
The suppressor rule, among with a whack of others, is arrogant ignorance.
 
Gumboots said:
Sound moderators are not only a benefit to sport shooters. Our wilderness industries such as miners and loggers rely on a full-time marksman for their health and safety. If sound moderators were legal, not only would we improve the health and well-being of ourselves, but of the wildlife as well. Something we don't study is the impact of firearm noise on the environment. When that camp marksman needs to shoot a bear, how many elk go stampeding? Sound moderators would be a net benefit to the public, our industries, and our environment.
Click to expand...
Don't say anything negative about firearms and wild life. You'll have all guns banned immediately so it protects the elk
 
truemask said:
Not sure of the validity of this but I heard from a 'firearm expert' who did speak to house of commons (in favour) about firearms. He said the bigger reason is suppressors alter rifling marks left on bullets meaning they aren't able to match bullets to barrels via forensic evidence. Which makes sense to me as the bullet is passing through a secondary surface without rifling. But I don't know of course.
Click to expand...
That's a garbage excuse. They can match a smashed to #### projectile to a firearm. The suppressor is irrelevant.
 
Petrock said:
That's a garbage excuse. They can match a smashed to #### projectile to a firearm. The suppressor is irrelevant.
Click to expand...
Also,
Truemask,
It is to be hoped that a suppressor make no Physical contact with the pill whatsoever. It would be problematic if it did. Known as a Baffle Strike.
The so called expert was talking out of his/her A**
 
Pygmy blow guns are prohibited weapons in Canada along with throwing stars. I sometimes wonder if the authors of these laws spend their days getting high while watching Jonny Quest reruns.
 
Beeron said:
Also,
Truemask,
It is to be hoped that a suppressor make no Physical contact with the pill whatsoever. It would be problematic if it did. Known as a Baffle Strike.
The so called expert was talking out of his/her A**
Click to expand...
They are less common but models utilizing wipes do make contact. It's part of the design. They can be exceptionally quiet. As far as the explanation around that made by the "expert", I'm pretty sure the story is just made up.
 
Ya
B said:
They are less common but models utilizing wipes do make contact. It's part of the design. They can be exceptionally quiet. As far as the explanation around that made by the "expert", I'm pretty sure the story is just made up.
Click to expand...
Ya. I didn’t want to get into the whole thing with the sacrificial wipes. Especially as they, unlike standard suppressors, ARE intended to make guns very very quiet and have very limited use in clandestine operations or the like which is what the sheeple are afraid of.

Thwip thwip.
 
Two fold protects your ears and prevents a hungry bear from looking for your freshly downed buck after hearing the gun shot. A dangerous situation for a hunter forsure.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom