Travis Bickle
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Upper Lower Middle Alberta
Here's a question: are these rifles simply being prohib'd because the RCMP believes they are built on recycled military receivers? Maybe there is a manufacturer out there who'd love to build 1000 or so new receivers under a new FRT#? If I had one I'd be stripping the parts off it right now.
Also, what's the compatibility with the SIG rifles coming up from South America? Aren't they copied off a Swiss design or am I mistaken? I unfortunately haven't had the pleasure of owning one.
My last question, are the other versions under review as well or do they all have separate FRT#?
*posted this in one of the other threads. Just curious if anyone has some answers...
I'm not 100% informed on the entire matter. Anyone please set me straight if I'm wrong.
Everything I have read about this whole fiasco (TSC throwing the whole thing and all firearms owners under the bus included) is that the rifles were built on what was essentially a full auto capable reciever, they were just assembled as only being capable of semi auto fire. This would clearly put the rifle in the prohib status as far as gun laws in Canada since 1992 would it not?
Once the RCMP caught wind of this due to the efforts of TSC to bring it to light.....they applied long existing and established regulation to land the rifle in the prohibited category. It's pretty cut and dry. They didn't seem to bend any rules or "create new laws" to get this specific model in the prohib category as far as I know?
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong here. I haven't ever seen a bare bones non emotionally charged thread on this. Just finger pointing and hysterics and people talking vaguely while winking etc etc. But again, I don't live on the forum all day long.
The RCMP reclassified this rifle based on some pretty solid facts if this is the case. At the same time they are issuing non restricted FRT's for scary black Communist Bull Pups and other scary black rifles ala FAMAE SG542 built on semi auto specific receivers as frequently as they are submitted these days.
Do I think it's wrong that they won't be compensating people for it? Hell yes I think it's wrong.
Do I agree with the inane firearms regulations making a rifle "easily converted to fire fully automatic"? Hell no.
Still the real root of this issue lies with the actual regulations and the classification system itself which has been around for many years now. Sadly this model Swiss Arms fell on the wrong side of the thin line. In this case it fell pretty clearly from all the information I've seen.
But that's what we live under in Canada unfortunately