First threads are locked. Then, those criticizing dealers here are often banned. Thought of that?
Are you suggesting dealers shouldn't be held accountable for this kind of garbage in this kind of forum?
First threads are locked. Then, those criticizing dealers here are often banned. Thought of that?
Or there is likely another reason
It isn't bad enough that buyers are dealing with this saga but we have to read snide, baiting comments from the peanut gallery too? Give us some credit and a little slack...
Exactly.
Just as I waited for the rifle I ordered to be in my possession before commenting on provenance, so too will I wait for this issue to be concluded before I leave feedback.
Classy. And now you are pink.
Shoots them tight..... 3" at 50m lol.
He may want to let someone else built his next M1 for him....
He did say it's an M1 right, not SKS?
Shoots them tight..... 3" at 50m lol.
He may want to let someone else built his next M1 for him....
He did say it's an M1 right, not SKS?
Must be one of those (inferior commercial conversions)![]()
Tootall, we have met before through a mutual friend though you probably won't remember me. If you would like to see for yourself the rifles I was sent by Marstar let me know and we can meet up. If you know any knowledgeable people who would like to have a look too feel free to bring them along.
He really is playing with fire. I have done business with Marstar in the past. I can't, in light of this situation, see myself doing so again in the future. Damn shame, but there it is.
I dont have a dog in this hunt primarily because I would never spend $1700 on ANY Garand (you guys should shake your heads - WTF were you thinking?!?! - dont you have wives controlling you!!) ... nor have I ever purchased from Marstars .. and I see he has a lot of positive feedback (and some not so positive recent comments!)
BUT ... is it possible that Marstars got "stung" by a wholesaler with a BS line ... maybe they inspected a few "samples" that passed the sniff test ... and placed an order for the balance of the 'stock'? I am not 'planting' a plausible explanation .... just that it doesnt make sense that a firm that has reasonably positive feedback for several years -- suddenly risks it all with a stunt like this.
Anyway -- until you folks are done right (and ethically) by Marstars on this deal -- i certainly wouldnt consider any purchases from them.
BUT ... is it possible that Marstars got "stung" by a wholesaler with a BS line ... maybe they inspected a few "samples" that passed the sniff test ... and placed an order for the balance of the 'stock'? I am not 'planting' a plausible explanation .... just that it doesnt make sense that a firm that has reasonably positive feedback for several years -- suddenly risks it all with a stunt like this.
Anyway -- until you folks are done right (and ethically) by Marstars on this deal -- i certainly wouldnt consider any purchases from them.
I dont have a dog in this hunt primarily because I would never spend $1700 on ANY Garand (you guys should shake your heads - WTF were you thinking?!?! - dont you have wives controlling you!!) ... nor have I ever purchased from Marstars .. and I see he has a lot of positive feedback (and some not so positive recent comments!)
BUT ... is it possible that Marstars got "stung" by a wholesaler with a BS line ... maybe they inspected a few "samples" that passed the sniff test ... and placed an order for the balance of the 'stock'? I am not 'planting' a plausible explanation .... just that it doesnt make sense that a firm that has reasonably positive feedback for several years -- suddenly risks it all with a stunt like this.
Anyway -- until you folks are done right (and ethically) by Marstars on this deal -- i certainly wouldnt consider any purchases from them.