The situation is the same as it was when I lost my Uzi and Franchi LF57 and I quote a contact in HQ where the techs are working There is a lot of serious grinding going on in the attempt to make various Non restricted firearms shoot Full Auto a concerted effort by any and all means available to make reviews happen prior to C 301 possibly passing. The method used such as grinding parts , replacing parts, using feeler guages stuck behing the trigger till it fires full auto. These methods came out in court involving the LF57 Franchi certain models of the Uzi and the MP-5 where entire trigger mechanism were taken from Duty weapons and transfered then an evaluation was done. IT ONLY CAME OUT IN CROSS EXAMINATION DURING VOIRE DIERE during the credibility of the Crowns expert witness after which the Judge ruled that was against the ACT. The process that is going on now follows the same pattern and they do not want any of these cases to come into court because they are aware that Judges will rule against them with the case law present from the past ruling and would destroy their effort to undermine owners rights to these firearms. In the past those that have been involved in these cases were told we will bankrupt you before you get there we will destroy your work and lives if you push this further just let it go and we will withdraw the charges. the last time around I lost enough and now I will not remain silent on the techniques used to win by any means.
T97 News.. not good.
- Thread starter aftermidnight
- Start date
- Status
#1bcshooter
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- North Of The DMZ (US border)
Class action lawsuit
However, if we had hard, verifiable, evidence this was happening again, then injuctive relief would be an option. Hit the courts BEFORE the reclassifications.
Possession of explosives and a prohibited device[Sound Suppressor]
Really... Ok that's kind of uncalled for.
Whatever though, I guess I still support him. But I've gotta say that's sort of disappointing, especially when his daughter's on YouTube going around saying he was a law abiding citizen. So much for that.
Last edited:
IIRC he was a gun smith and the stuff he had was at one time legal to own. Don't quote me on this but I think his arguement was that the stuff he had was MADE illegal.
And that making it illegal was unconstitutional because it violated the right to own firearms.
Constitutional Right
There is NO right to own property in the constitution,
It was purposely left out by the Marxist university professor recruited into the liberal party,
thankfully now dead, prime minister - Pierre Elliot Trudeau
There is NO right to own property in the constitution,
It was purposely left out by the Marxist university professor recruited into the liberal party,
thankfully now dead, prime minister - Pierre Elliot Trudeau
And there in lies the a problem in Canada for compensation for property stolen by agents of the Crown thru Acts or Policies implemented by the Government.
The right to own property is in the Defenbaker's Bill of Rights.
And the right to bear arms is in the English Bill of Rights, which apparently was transferred to Canada and never extinguished.
If it is the RCMP holding things up I wonder if you could file a complaint to the complaints commission. It looks like this would fall under their mandate and it says you can even file a complaint on behalf of someone else. At the very least you should get some kind of reply. I think if the RCMP seizes someone’s goods, that person or company should at least be owed an explanation. When the RCMP got the Type-97s they were list as non-restricted. I don't see how they can hold something indefinately in the hopes it will be re-classified.
http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/
http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/
- Status
