I cannot believe the preposterous way in which the RCMP is oppressing the .22 tacticool rifle. Clearly, they are doing it for the safety of the public. They don't want to deal with uncertain situations or use extreme force against criminals with "assault rifles". From their point of view, a cheap deadly looking .22 like the GSG-5, Sig or S&W could send the public into panic an paranoia given criminal activities such as robberies. So what can the RCMP do? They procrastinate.
Now, I personally doubt the danger that tacticool rimfires pose to the public. From a criminal's point of view, it would seem that a plinker is not a weapon of choice, but, I digress.
Just by the shear number of desperate people looking for a really nice tacticool non-restricted rifle, including myself

, a company could make huge amounts of money with a successful design.
The RCMP have imposed a monopoly environment, let me explain...
If a company succeeded in producing a gun that would be classified as a non-restricted tacticool rimfire, they would be the first to produce a gun that everyone would swarm to buy. Whilst, no such other design would be present, the company would monopolize the non-restricted tacticool market.
Granted, such rifles are already on the market...BUT I HATE THOSE BANANA MAGS

. Also, putting effort into building up a gun, when the potential to purchase a fully ready gun seems silly.
My thoughts on this matter: If a company produced a standard rifle .22, much like the ruger 10/22, but later after its approval by the RCMP introduce a complete remodeling kit, turning the traditional looking rifles into a tacticool rifle

, the RCMP would face greater challenges in restricting or perhaps prohibiting such a gun.
Some of my thoughts...correct me if you think i'm wrong..

Cheers,