Tavor or RA XCR-I need your thoughts on which and why.

Tavor.
Higher quality, more reliable, more compact, better balance, and more accurate.
Neither will let you pick off a coyote on the run at 400 yards. They are 2-3 moa rifles.
Nr acr is expensive, but as close as you can get to an ar in a non restricted platform.

...What he said...
 
find yourself a hk sl8. i love my rifle. it's accurate as hell and it's like nothing you'll ever shoot. you can find a used one about 1800 or a new one for 2400. i do sub moa with this rifle all the time.
 
I have a Tavor, ACR, and XCR-L. I love all three, but the one big advantage of the XCR-L is that you can easily set it up to shoot several calibers, which is nice. If that doesn't matter to you, you'll likely be happy with any of the three.
 
I have a Tavor, ACR, and XCR-L. I love all three, but the one big advantage of the XCR-L is that you can easily set it up to shoot several calibers, which is nice. If that doesn't matter to you, you'll likely be happy with any of the three.

Do you still have to check barrel lug, etc pins to come out? Or are the new ones fixed.
 
To me, the strip of the XCR is far superior to a Tavor. If I can't break a semi-auto rifle down easily, it's a strike against it. Not a deal-killer mind you, but I do like how easily the XCRs break down and field strip. The inside of the receiver is a lot more accessible too.

Coupled with the fact that for just a bolt and a barrel you have another cartridge you can shoot - that's a big plus. The optic would have to be re-zeroed with a calibre change for longer range shooting, but my buddy's XCR-L the receiver mounted scope actually maintains less than a 2" PoI shift between calibre changes out to 150 or so meters (at least between .223 and 7.62x39 anyways). More than that and he has to re-zero though.
 
Tavor.
Higher quality, more reliable, more compact, better balance, and more accurate.
Neither will let you pick off a coyote on the run at 400 yards. They are 2-3 moa rifles.
Nr acr is expensive, but as close as you can get to an ar in a non restricted platform.

My xcr was more accurate than my tavor by a full inch at 100 yards, just saying. But I hear it's hit and miss with both rifles. I agree 2-3 moa seems to be common.

They guys who own them say they get 1" and the guys who hate one or the other say they get 4-6", it's a CGN thing
 
Own both XCR see more range time becuase it is set up to shoot 7.62x39. Depends on how you shoot, Ergonomically XCR is better if you shoot with a bipod and prone.
 
To me, the strip of the XCR is far superior to a Tavor. If I can't break a semi-auto rifle down easily, it's a strike against it. Not a deal-killer mind you, but I do like how easily the XCRs break down and field strip. The inside of the receiver is a lot more accessible too.

What's far superior in the field stripping of the XCR compared to the Tavor? On the Tavor, you pop out the top pin on the butt and the whole bolt carrier group comes out...done. What can be easier than that? Pop another couple of pins and the trigger pack pops out...not that I've ever needed to do anything with it.
 
I had the exact same decision to make as you. When I read you post, I could swear that I wrote it myself. I shoot a lot of 3 gun matches. I went back and forth a long time and ended up with the Tavor. I really like the XCR and I probably will buy one one day. The major thing that tipped the scale for me was the over all length. I really like the concept of the bull pup design. I bought mine new from the Calgary Shooting Centre for $2,300 so the price was no issue. The XCR does have a few quirks which shouldn't scare off any buyer, Wolverine is awesome with helping you out with any questions or problems. That alone was a big factory on why I still want an XCR for my collection.

Do you want a small compact design or a long riffle? Good luck. You'll probably be happy either way.

tavor2_zps9b915862.jpg
 
I had the exact same decision to make as you. When I read you post, I could swear that I wrote it myself. I shoot a lot of 3 gun matches. I went back and forth a long time and ended up with the Tavor. I really like the XCR and I probably will buy one one day. The major thing that tipped the scale for me was the over all length. I really like the concept of the bull pup design. I bought mine new from the Calgary Shooting Centre for $2,300 so the price was no issue. The XCR does have a few quirks which shouldn't scare off any buyer, Wolverine is awesome with helping you out with any questions or problems. That alone was a big factory on why I still want an XCR for my collection.

Do you want a small compact design or a long riffle? Good luck. You'll probably be happy either way.

tavor2_zps9b915862.jpg

I got a two point VCAS sling i would be using. Do you find with the tavor its easy to shoot past 100 yards? I just want this gun to be my go to for everything. I do like the XCL-R for its ability to change calibers quite easily. I like how its pretty ARish. I just wish I could shoot both. If NEA does come out with a AR180B type rilfe, i will probably buy that. Its a hard decision. Lot of cash on the line. I want to be able to shoot 5.56mm 62 gr or bigger ammo. I am worried with XCR-L 1/9 twist.
 
I got a two point VCAS sling i would be using. Do you find with the tavor its easy to shoot past 100 yards? I just want this gun to be my go to for everything. I do like the XCL-R for its ability to change calibers quite easily. I like how its pretty ARish. I just wish I could shoot both. If NEA does come out with a AR180B type rilfe, i will probably buy that. Its a hard decision. Lot of cash on the line. I want to be able to shoot 5.56mm 62 gr or bigger ammo. I am worried with XCR-L 1/9 twist.

Not clear what your issue is with the 1/9 twist and 62g plus projectiles?

www.gunsandammo.com/ammo/pair-barrel-twist-rates-ammo/
 
I got a two point VCAS sling i would be using. Do you find with the tavor its easy to shoot past 100 yards? I just want this gun to be my go to for everything. I do like the XCL-R for its ability to change calibers quite easily. I like how its pretty ARish. I just wish I could shoot both. If NEA does come out with a AR180B type rilfe, i will probably buy that. Its a hard decision. Lot of cash on the line. I want to be able to shoot 5.56mm 62 gr or bigger ammo. I am worried with XCR-L 1/9 twist.
1/9 will shoot the 62g, you can also get the XCR-l in 1-8 and 1-7 twist.
 
Yah thats the best option here, but youre oooking at 3500$, I have a tavor and an AR. honestly Im looking at an acr NR now. This restricted stuff is annoying and my AR loses its fun because of it.

The Tavor is fun but not something you want to be shooting 1 moa with, best i could run my tavor was 1.7 moa with a lot of sand bags and expensive hornady ammo.

My AR is ok, comfortable and I modded it the way I want but restricted is annoying.

Im looking at an ACR now, but funds are being stored for the expenses on my townhouse, so we will see where I am financially this summer and I'll decide then. I was thinking if getting a new acr, running it for like 6 months or so then sending it to Herron for a krieger NR barrel and reclassification.

I own a Tavor and love the rifle for its short, compact package. Its true battle tested and can definitely take a beating! It shoots straight and has a huge up and coming aftermarket inventory. Saying that, if you already like the AR and are familiar with it, the XCR will feel much more AR like than a Tavor especially in ergonomics and the trigger.

I like the Tavor more but I would recommend the XCR to you
 
I got a two point VCAS sling i would be using. Do you find with the tavor its easy to shoot past 100 yards? I just want this gun to be my go to for everything. I do like the XCL-R for its ability to change calibers quite easily. I like how its pretty ARish. I just wish I could shoot both. If NEA does come out with a AR180B type rilfe, i will probably buy that. Its a hard decision. Lot of cash on the line. I want to be able to shoot 5.56mm 62 gr or bigger ammo. I am worried with XCR-L 1/9 twist.

Shooting past 100 yards. It depends on your body position. If you're standing unsupported, I find the Tavor really easy and stable with the Israeli 6 points of contact (hand guard on the support hand forearm is awesome). When I went back the the AR I found myself trying to find a way to get that extra stabilization with my support forearm.

With my longer AR, and the XCR little front heavy, standing unsupported with a little cross wind, it's a little harder to keep the sights perfectly still. If you're shooting off a bench or prone off a bi-pod, AR-XCR wins hands down. You can put a bi-pod on the Tavor and it works well, you just have to buy the rail for $50-60 bucks.
 
Here are a few reasons I bought an XCR-L and I just received another three 7.62X39 10 round XCR pistol mags in the mail today.

I have complete uppers in 223 & 6.8SPC and zero interest in a Tavor.

Coyote_pic_Dec_28_2014_Svens_Ranch_2.JPG


From a couple years ago

img_4254.jpg


img_9303.jpg


img_9390.jpg


Me_with_Bucks_Oct_4_2010.JPG


Life and interests are always changing I've had this setup for 5 years now been thinking I may pass it on to someone that would like to explore the excellent world of non restricted semi-autos.

In other words I'm thinking that I may sell it and put the money back into a long range 1000 yard + hunting rig.
 
Last edited:
I prefer the XCR only because it feels AR 15 "like"....mag release and safety are almost the same, and the grips can be swapped out. Mag changes are instinctively the same....etc. I bent a firing pin in my XCr...fixed it temporarily until parts came in. Loctite was needed once...runs like a champ...very fast cycling....the bolt is a bit lighter than an AR BCG. I can run weak Tulammo on setting 2,..and leave it on setting S or 1 for everything else.
BTW,...it loves the Hornady 53gr Superformance ammo....great groupings.
 
Back
Top Bottom