The .375 Ruger, particularly when chambered in the Ruger Alaskan rifle, has plenty of advantages, and most who choose that combination will never have a complaint. Some disliked the Hogue stock, but in a marine environment this stock has the advantage over both wood and fiberglass. The rifle is affordable, easy to carry, and pleasant enough for an experienced rifleman to shoot well. Its flat shooting, and packs sufficient punch to accomplish what is asked of it. It isn't flashy, but then its a journeyman's tool rather than a show piece who can only be afforded only by the man who demands the best in fine wood and royal blue, and perhaps this should be kept in mind when the .375 Ruger is being described in regal terms. It fills the same role today that the 9.3X62 filled at the turn of the 20th Century; an affordable working man's rifle suitable for the biggest game. From the standpoint of ballistics, the .375 Ruger meets the standard that was set 100 years ago, and the standard is pretty good. The .375 Ultra and the .378 Weatherby exceed that standard, but any advantages they provide must be balanced with the requirements for a larger, more expensive rifle, and a level of recoil that many would find objectionable. Now I like my .375 Ultra, and I'm not about to trade it for a .375 Ruger, but then again, if I'd of had a .375 Ruger, I wouldn't trade it in for a rifle chambered for one of the larger .375 cartridges either.