The IWI Carmel: Initial Thoughts and Observations **Range Report added on post #48**

This is quite simply the only answer.
No. Give us back our AR's is the only real answer. Both the Makasi and the Carmel are cope guns in comparison. I can't decide which I hate the least, that is the dilemma. It's as though it were last call and all the honey's are spoken for, pickin's are are few and far from slim and I have to choose who I'm going home with. The Bad, or the Ugly?
1794600383392.png
 
Just got back from the range. Here are some more loads i shot today with the Carmel. Looks like for me personally, i will be using S&B 55gr Ball for general use and S&B Precision 69gr for distance. Will play with the Remington one a little more as well i think. This time, i shot 10 round groups, the most promising loads were shot 2 groups of 10 just to get more actual data and determine consistency. Please consider there was quite chilly today and about 18km/h wind, you can see weather on each report card.


screencapture-app-loadnode-app-print-session-c959e9ab-18af-400e-9fb6-af444aeaf65e-2026-11-13-1...pngscreencapture-app-loadnode-app-print-session-d30b2127-0155-471c-aca2-b03285e03cab-2026-11-13-1...pngscreencapture-app-loadnode-app-print-session-242ae5e5-5f4f-4c2f-9773-d82c5f9aeb4a-2026-11-13-1...pngscreencapture-app-loadnode-app-print-session-0bdc7d44-6af3-48a7-9046-e1c20c4b113e-2026-11-13-1...pngscreencapture-app-loadnode-app-print-session-0185d020-48e3-4a27-9c9d-7a92a31b0c64-2026-11-13-1...pngscreencapture-app-loadnode-app-print-session-ca53341a-3529-4231-9e02-03b8c839adb3-2026-11-13-1...png
 
Just got back from the range. Here are some more loads i shot today with the Carmel. Looks like for me personally, i will be using S&B 55gr Ball for general use and S&B Precision 69gr for distance. Will play with the Remington one a little more as well i think. This time, i shot 10 round groups, the most promising loads were shot 2 groups of 10 just to get more actual data and determine consistency. Please consider there was quite chilly today and about 18km/h wind, you can see weather on each report card.


View attachment 1239039View attachment 1239040View attachment 1239041View attachment 1239042View attachment 1239043View attachment 1239044
Do you have any PMC X-TAC 55gr 5.56 to test?

I took my Carmel to the range today and it shot under 1" at 50 yards with it. 62gr PMC was significantly worse.
 
No. Give us back our AR's is the only real answer. Both the Makasi and the Carmel are cope guns in comparison. I can't decide which I hate the least, that is the dilemma. It's as though it were last call and all the honey's are spoken for, pickin's are are few and far from slim and I have to choose who I'm going home with. The Bad, or the Ugly?
View attachment 1238996

I’d honestly buy the IWI Carmel regardless
I’m a gun nut after all.

But semantics aside, if it came down to only owning one rifle in a country where you could shop the entire market?

I’d have and AR or an AK and call it a day
 
I do not have the detailed info like @spectrality provided but got the Carmel out to the range yesterday and was pleasantly surprised with the accuracy. Shot 4 different factory loads and 3 of them came in at or below 2 MOA for 10-shot groups. I know - nothing spectacular - but I think people expecting 1-1.5 MOA out of a rifle like this for any significant grouping (not 3 or 5) are living in a fantasy world.

The factory ammo:
Federal TRU 64gr (2.4) [odd result here usually pretty accurate for me in other 223/556 rifles]
XTAC M855 62gr (2.0)
Federal Fusion 62gr (1.7)
Frontier 75gr (1.5)

Basically this is right in line with the Alcor for me very slightly better and definitely better than the X95 (2.5ish MOA) and the Tavor 7 which was the worst gun I've ever owned. Not as accurate as the Raven with exception of the Frontier ammo. I also did not shoot these slowly or with the same type of attention and focus as I do with a bolt action.

Other thoughts on the rifle - yes she's a chonk but everything feels very nice and robust. Not a single issue worked great with both Cross 10/10 mags and LAR-15 mags.
 
I do not have the detailed info like @spectrality provided but got the Carmel out to the range yesterday and was pleasantly surprised with the accuracy. Shot 4 different factory loads and 3 of them came in at or below 2 MOA for 10-shot groups. I know - nothing spectacular - but I think people expecting 1-1.5 MOA out of a rifle like this for any significant grouping (not 3 or 5) are living in a fantasy world.

The factory ammo:
Federal TRU 64gr (2.4) [odd result here usually pretty accurate for me in other 223/556 rifles]
XTAC M855 62gr (2.0)
Federal Fusion 62gr (1.7)
Frontier 75gr (1.5)

Basically this is right in line with the Alcor for me very slightly better and definitely better than the X95 (2.5ish MOA) and the Tavor 7 which was the worst gun I've ever owned. Not as accurate as the Raven with exception of the Frontier ammo. I also did not shoot these slowly or with the same type of attention and focus as I do with a bolt action.

Other thoughts on the rifle - yes she's a chonk but everything feels very nice and robust. Not a single issue worked great with both Cross 10/10 mags and LAR-15 mags.
1.5 moa out of Frontier 75gr is great. I've found that ammo tends to shoot well in most 1:7tw carbines and I use the same bullet (Hornady 75gr BTHP) in my handloads.

I also ot similar precision out of the Alcor I shot but I found it suffered quite heavily from a wandering point of impact. Have you found that to be the case as well? Also agree on the X95 having uninspiring levels of precision. Despite the 1:7tw barrel they always seem to shoot 55 and 62gr ammo better than match 75/77gr ammo.
 
1.5 moa out of Frontier 75gr is great. I've found that ammo tends to shoot well in most 1:7tw carbines and I use the same bullet (Hornady 75gr BTHP) in my handloads.

I also ot similar precision out of the Alcor I shot but I found it suffered quite heavily from a wandering point of impact. Have you found that to be the case as well? Also agree on the X95 having uninspiring levels of precision. Despite the 1:7tw barrel they always seem to shoot 55 and 62gr ammo better than match 75/77gr ammo.

The X95 is an enigma of a gun.

They are really well built and have some unique design advantages (compact, weight more at the rear which I prefer, reliable, pretty easy to work on etc etc) but they are on the heavy side (which is negated a little by the weight at the rear like I mentioned before), have a bit more height over bore than some guns and as you say they do not react as you would expect with various ammo.

I found heavy loads that worked and light loads that worked but being 1:7 twist it should have gotten better at the upper end of the spectrum however you could never say for sure like most guns.

Having said all that I miss shooting my friends X95.
 
The X95 is an enigma of a gun.

They are really well built and have some unique design advantages (compact, weight more at the rear which I prefer, reliable, pretty easy to work on etc etc) but they are on the heavy side (which is negated a little by the weight at the rear like I mentioned before), have a bit more height over bore than some guns and as you say they do not react as you would expect with various ammo.

I found heavy loads that worked and light loads that worked but being 1:7 twist it should have gotten better at the upper end of the spectrum however you could never say for sure like most guns.

Having said all that I miss shooting my friends X95.
Yeah, it is strange. the one I was shooting had most of the precision mods on it as well: Geissele trigger and free-floated mlok handguard and still really under-performed with match ammo. Still a nice practical rifle for what it was intended for but not really something you can easily mod to make it more of a precision platform like you can with AR pattern rifles.
 
Back
Top Bottom