Sweet - nice rig! ...wow looks great!!
I think my JRC is about a year and a half old or so...it didn't come with a threaded barrel either.
Same reason I ended up with a Beretta CX-4 which you can field strip without tools in 20 to 30 seconds working slowly and is easy to clean and just as accurate as any other 9 MM Carbine. Way better than my Kel Tec Sub 2000 for sure. My Beretta also shoots cast bullets really well, making it very cheap to shoot. I have never had a failure to feed a single round ever as well. Goes bang every time you pull the trigger.I looked at them but hate how they break down to clean so spent the extra cash on the thureon defence.
Good carbines but damn, they are ugly. Why you posting in the JRC thread?
If I could have bought a new NR Beretta CX4 at the same price as the JRC I would have bought it.
I'm glad I went with the JRC though. Just all around more versatile. I'm a lefty. a Broke one. Costs nothing to make the JRC a left handed shooter and its READY to add all the cheap Chinese (or pricey Western) furniture to right out of the box. Caliber convertible. AR parts compatibility (some).
And the new JRCs function just fine.
The Beretta? Comes with sights.
Probably accepts 92 mags? and they GOTTA be as common as the Glock mags out in the world? Probably moreso?
You don't hear much attention being given to the rate of twist in the PCC rifling like you do in AR discussion. Howcome?
Does a lot of it have to do with velocity?
I think the JRC's ROT is like 1:12 or maybe even 1:19 or something like that?
I have a 444 Marlin. HUGE fat heavy projectile lumbering out the muzzle. It's an older one with the "microgroove" rifling and iirc it's ROT is like 1 in over 20 inches :-O
Whatever happened to "a heavier projectile requires a higher/faster rate of twist.."?
ANYWAY, it would be interesting to see what the different twist rates are for the various PCCs out there.
IIRC again, the TD spins them a bit faster than the JRC.
In the end, the Beretta is a cool rig. To me. Subjective of course.
The sight humps do look kinda goofy now that you mention it. If you take an envelope or something and cover the humps in the photos above, IDK...it just doesn't seem to look right without them...either.