isn't the 9.3x62 the smallest sized round allowed by many countries in africa for hunting dangerous animals ?
so a person groups all the rifles together suited for a particular purpose and compares them based on their needs and what the law will allow .......
so why shouldn't the 9.3x62 be compared to the various 375's ?
it is no different than comparing all pick up trucks that have the ability to tow at least 10,000 pounds .
in some not all ... and in most the .375 is really the mini.
on animals shot there is not differences at all to be true but what the owner beliefs is something else.
if i choose the 375 ruger its not the caliber on is own but the package that ruger made with a short barrel and perfs. if the 375h&h was able to deliver the same maybe but today as a leftie few choices remains for me
if you take a 20" for a 9,3x62 it s not going in the same whatever they said i ve tried it and it s better with 23" at mini.
i ve met some people that are on the h&h bandwagon but if the 375 ruger was appearing earlier or sooner they ll choose another way. this is it this is evolutuion and to each his own but the world is in evolution and we choose to take or not.
dont tell me about marketing because most of us are changing their tvs, their cars but the rifles no, come on ...