I know you already ordered one, but people google and read these threads so I'll throw my 2 cents in.
My first budget rifle in this class. A ruger ranch .556, I have a redfield 2-7 on it
Pros:
-shoots very well
- accompanying good trigger, that was light enough from the factory that I never adjusted it.
- no issues with feeding (not sure if this is a pro but others mentioned it may have them)
- cool short barrel
- love the integral mounts, I wish some higher end rifles had this as a stock option (maybe they do and I'm not looking)
-I bet the recoil pad would be effective on a rifle that recoils.
Cons:
- low comb
-poor machining (zipper bolt), this is a meh for me as its basically a target rifle in this caliber for me. I was going to take it on a hunting trip elsewhere but it fell through. I don't hunt wolves or coyotes so it will not see much use here.
- stock seems very "flimsy" again this may not be an actual issue.
- balance is favoured towards the barrel end of the rifle (I don't know if it's really 'light")
- magazine is a bit difficult to load, it seems like a strange design but I haven't owned any other external magazine center fire rifles but the tikka.
- trigger blade thing ala the accutrigger, which I don't like at all.
Neither a pro nor a con in my books but opinions may differ:
I like the molded in trigger guard and sling swivels. I know this is a cost saving measure but I think it's kind of slick. I bet it genuinely outrages some people lol.
Probably wouldn't buy another one in a larger caliber. Thought the .450 bushmaster seems cool. I don't hate it, but I don't love it...
My first budget rifle in this class. A ruger ranch .556, I have a redfield 2-7 on it
Pros:
-shoots very well
- accompanying good trigger, that was light enough from the factory that I never adjusted it.
- no issues with feeding (not sure if this is a pro but others mentioned it may have them)
- cool short barrel
- love the integral mounts, I wish some higher end rifles had this as a stock option (maybe they do and I'm not looking)
-I bet the recoil pad would be effective on a rifle that recoils.
Cons:
- low comb
-poor machining (zipper bolt), this is a meh for me as its basically a target rifle in this caliber for me. I was going to take it on a hunting trip elsewhere but it fell through. I don't hunt wolves or coyotes so it will not see much use here.
- stock seems very "flimsy" again this may not be an actual issue.
- balance is favoured towards the barrel end of the rifle (I don't know if it's really 'light")
- magazine is a bit difficult to load, it seems like a strange design but I haven't owned any other external magazine center fire rifles but the tikka.
- trigger blade thing ala the accutrigger, which I don't like at all.
Neither a pro nor a con in my books but opinions may differ:
I like the molded in trigger guard and sling swivels. I know this is a cost saving measure but I think it's kind of slick. I bet it genuinely outrages some people lol.
Probably wouldn't buy another one in a larger caliber. Thought the .450 bushmaster seems cool. I don't hate it, but I don't love it...
Last edited: