The unnecessarily short barrel and the weird front sight. To me a 7mm-08 isn't a "brush buster" it's a nice little cartridge, why make it's performance less than ideal by shortening the barrel. Assumming that then it's a scope rifle, so why the strange sight?
I would just buy a normal A11 in 7-08 and to me it would be a superior package, and FWIW you are undersoping the rifle with a 1.5x5 Leupold. I could hit foot sized rocks at 500 metres with the 7-08's cousin the 260 remington. That cartridge if you mate it with the right bullet and load is a great longrange shooter, so why try and take that part of it's performance away
My 2 cents.
Mainly, it comes down to style of hunting for me.
I would not shoot a big game animal at 500 meteres. Not cause it's wrong or any of that s**t, just cause that's not my style.
300 yrds is plenty for me. Throw me a yote, and 500 with glee..
(I really like getting very close to animals, stalking...)
I hunt heavy bush usually. Sometimes theres an opportunity at the treeline or cut line, that is a little ways further, but more often than not it's in the bush. But this way I'm well
well equipped for both
I have had many rifles, and have had issues with the longer barrels, for about 80% of my hunting.
Shorter barrels have always served me well in my big game hunting.
The sights work for me,... quick aquistion in close quarters...
The scope, in a 1.5 - 5x Leupold will give me my close quarters, as well as the far extent of my range. The irons will be nice when i'm in the s**t weather or take a bad tumble..or feel in the mood for using irons..(as I often like to do) this scope will also let me get a little lower with the straight 1 inch..
In short I enjoy short, compact hunting rifles with iron sights, for big game, often scoped with quick detatches
Underscoping?
Well my .02 cents is that too many guys are over scoping...
as for underperforming?
The job done at 300 yrds and less is my aim, so if indeed that happens, performance is optimal to my purpose.