The SIG Sauer P320 Has Never Been Good

ffolkes said:
Yeah, the US Justice department, a place well known for its "folklore". You really are weird, man. And its 112 of them democreep departments now.
Click to expand...
you didn't get that from the "official" US justice department, that's for sure, and again, you're quoting the most UNDERTRAINED groups, most of these people will NEVER pull their pistol from their holster for their entire career in law enforcement, other than the odd yearly mandated testing,if that.
 
Last edited:
Bartok5 said:
Right. My POINT being that very, very few of us recreational shooters on CGN have ever"duty carried" a P320. So the entire "conversation" is rather academic, no? Near as I can determine, the P320 was designed for safe recreational shooting just as much as it was for "stressful combat situations". Handled properly in the former context, the P320 has performed just as "safely" as any other pistol in my stable....

I am not saying that the P320 is entirely without issue. The ability of the internals to move during rough handling is problematic and needs to be addressed. But handled properly (eg. safely) during recreational shooting there is nothing whatsoever to be concerned about. This business of people with P320s being afraid to use them for recreational shooting is ludicrous, and a complete over-reaction to the occasional problem associated with rough handling while loaded.
Click to expand...
This doesn't take into account for a lot of people using the P320 in IPSC, where they do in fact holster on a loaded chamber.
 
From a psych perspective I just find it interesting that some have this need to defend massive corporations as though they are the latest adult you are aligned with. Now arguing with your new daddy makes me a bad person or something.

You still see this defense mechanism with people defending decades of Remington and their shotgun triggers, pharmaceutical companies after drug recalls and certain car manufacturers decades after famous events that got many people killed but are still forming a part of your persona and outward affectations to the world.
 
ffolkes said:
From a psych perspective I just find it interesting that some have this need to defend massive corporations as though they are the latest adult you are aligned with. Now arguing with your new daddy makes me a bad person or something.

You still see this defense mechanism with people defending decades of Remington and their shotgun triggers, pharmaceutical companies after drug recalls and certain car manufacturers decades after famous events that got many people killed but are still forming a part of your persona and outward affectations to the world.
Click to expand...
too funny,,you sound like a true professional conspiracy type,have you debunked the moon landings yet,
 
Here Wyoming Gun Project does some new drop tests with their modified 320.

The rear projection of the new style sear is removed so the simultaneous sympathetic movement of the sear and the trigger is prevented, also the spring itself is changed to one that adds +10% more force in the forward direction, towards the muzzle. This acts in opposition when the gun lands on its rear end or is whacked by the mallet. Its not clear yet if it is the sear mod itself, or whether it is reducing the sear weight by so much by having done this mod to it, that is actually having the effect.

 
This weeks updates

Cirrus California PD p320 discharge in the holster:
https://fox40.com/news/local-news/s...gun-goes-off-at-a-northern-california-campus/

This guy's crotch can also be added to the list of p320 "unanticipated lead surplus" recipients

From a new report regarding the sights and optical plates flying off the gun "3 of the m17s where the sights fell off during firing, the screws were found to have no threads on them..."
 

Federal judge issues key ruling against gun maker Sig Sauer in widow's lawsuit​


Lawsuit claims company's P320 pistol discharged while holstered due to faulty components​

excerpt:

The firm says it represents "more than 100 P320 victims injured by Sig Sauer’s first striker-fired (in contrast to a traditional hammer) pistol" and alleges that "Sig Sauer is the only gunmaker to make a mass-produced sidearm that lacks an external safety to guard against unintended discharges."

https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy...ng-against-gun-maker-sig-sauer-widows-lawsuit
 
Why would any sane owner/user be jamming a punch into the rear of the slide?!! Unless you are stripping for maintenance/repair, there is almost absolutely no reason to interfere with the striker group in the slide.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom