The Stag 10s NR stripped receiver set thread

45ACPKING said:
an ar15 accepts prohibitted M16 full auto components ... does it make your ar15 prohibitted?
all kinds of rifles with 5 round mags accept 10 round pistol mags and +10 round bolt action rifle mags....... but it doesn't change your rifle's classification now does it?
Unless the "unregulated" upper you are putting on your "rcmp firearms lab certified non restricted" has a barrel length under the non restricted length you have zero to concern yourself with.

I could crank up my milling machine right now and carve myself out a one off upper for my stag-10 ...... and what does that mean? nothing..... it's just another part right? What matters is the barrel length I attach to it. It's that simple. Read the firearms act.
Click to expand...

Not sure if you're agreeing or disagreeing with my post so I'll just say K.
 
None of this really matters if there isn't a classification for the Larue lower. I'm assuming no one has one in Canada because they are a fortune... Someone look up the Larue OBR 7.62, PredatOBR 7.62 or PredatAR 7.62. See if there is anything there
 
BooSSted said:
None of this really matters if there isn't a classification for the Larue lower. I'm assuming no one has one in Canada because they are a fortune... Someone look up the Larue OBR 7.62, PredatOBR 7.62 or PredatAR 7.62. See if there is anything there
Click to expand...

Wrong, LaRue OBR is restricted. And few guys have them

And they are not a fortune either.
 
frabill said:
Not sure if you're agreeing or disagreeing with my post so I'll just say K.
Click to expand...

no i wasn't agreeing with you I was trying to point out the folly of the road some of you are trying to go down. If I failed to do so.... well I have no apology for you my friend.

an upper is non regulated , it's parts.
Meaning my wife can buy me a restricted upper from any store in canada and not need an rpal (or any firearms license for that matter) to do so.
So why would a firearm get prohibitted or restricted simply by the upper that is attached to it?? Because the firearms act clarifies barrel length and overall length are the determining factors.

in the case of the bcl 102 and stag 10s , the lowers have been deemed nonrestricted because they do not meet the criteria of restricted or prohibitted "except" by barrel length (and overal of course)

they , the rcmp, issued the frt...... enuff said..... go buy one.... no one cares what upper you put on it as long as you are following the firearms act right?

edit** I'm not trying to be a #### or be combative , i just fail to see why so many gun owners fail to understand the simplest things about our laws and what they can and can't do. Sick of seeing fellow gun nuts fret over the fear of confiscation and the man swooping in. Seeing people hear the news of another fantastic semi auto non restricted in a proven reliable platform/design and people think they are doing something wrong by buying one.... living in fear that the bubble is gonna pop and someone at the firearms lab will suddenly go oops! I shouldna let those thru!!

you guys think after the cz and swiss arms debacle that they are gonna allow themselves to do that again? i don't think "they" are that dumb. I just think that for once, some common sense is prevailing at the firearms lab.
so I mean no offense to anyone , it's just frustrating to see gun owners questioning this so much even though the act is quite clear.
 
Last edited:
45ACPKING said:
no i wasn't agreeing with you I was trying to point out the folly of the road some of you are trying to go down. If I failed to do so.... well I have no apology for you my friend.

an upper is non regulated , it's parts.
Meaning my wife can buy me a restricted upper from any store in canada and not need an rpal (or any firearms license for that matter) to do so.
So why would a firearm get prohibitted or restricted simply by the upper that is attached to it?? Because the firearms act clarifies barrel length and overall length are the determining factors.

in the case of the bcl 102 and stag 10s , the lowers have been deemed nonrestricted because they do not meet the criteria of restricted or prohibitted "except" by barrel length (and overal of course)

they , the rcmp, issued the frt...... enuff said..... go buy one.... no one cares what upper you put on it as long as you are following the firearms act right?

edit** I'm not trying to be a #### or be combative , i just fail to see why so many gun owners fail to understand the simplest things about our laws and what they can and can't do. Sick of seeing fellow gun nuts fret over the fear of confiscation and the man swooping in. Seeing people hear the news of another fantastic semi auto non restricted in a proven reliable platform/design and people think they are doing something wrong by buying one.... living in fear that the bubble is gonna pop and someone at the firearms lab will suddenly go oops! I shouldna let those thru!!

you guys think after the cz and swiss arms debacle that they are gonna allow themselves to do that again? i don't think "they" are that dumb. I just think that for once, some common sense is prevailing at the firearms lab.
so I mean no offense to anyone , it's just frustrating to see gun owners questioning this so much even though the act is quite clear.
Click to expand...

Good post. Guys getting bent out of a shape over an upper with NO BARREL at all lol
 
45ACPKING said:
no i wasn't agreeing with you I was trying to point out the folly of the road some of you are trying to go down. If I failed to do so.... well I have no apology for you my friend.

an upper is non regulated , it's parts.
Meaning my wife can buy me a restricted upper from any store in canada and not need an rpal (or any firearms license for that matter) to do so.
So why would a firearm get prohibitted or restricted simply by the upper that is attached to it?? Because the firearms act clarifies barrel length and overall length are the determining factors.

in the case of the bcl 102 and stag 10s , the lowers have been deemed nonrestricted because they do not meet the criteria of restricted or prohibitted "except" by barrel length (and overal of course)

they , the rcmp, issued the frt...... enuff said..... go buy one.... no one cares what upper you put on it as long as you are following the firearms act right?

edit** I'm not trying to be a #### or be combative , i just fail to see why so many gun owners fail to understand the simplest things about our laws and what they can and can't do. Sick of seeing fellow gun nuts fret over the fear of confiscation and the man swooping in. Seeing people hear the news of another fantastic semi auto non restricted in a proven reliable platform/design and people think they are doing something wrong by buying one.... living in fear that the bubble is gonna pop and someone at the firearms lab will suddenly go oops! I shouldna let those thru!!

you guys think after the cz and swiss arms debacle that they are gonna allow themselves to do that again? i don't think "they" are that dumb. I just think that for once, some common sense is prevailing at the firearms lab.
so I mean no offense to anyone , it's just frustrating to see gun owners questioning this so much even though the act is quite clear.
Click to expand...

You’re stuck on the upper... that’s not the point.

If the Larue upper fits and works on the Stag lower, then how is the NR Stag lower different than the Restricted Larue lower?

Someone built the bridge and now we’re crossing it. It’s a valid question, and the point you’re making isn’t relevant.

If you think the RCMP won’t back track, you’re a fool.
 
CGN again has gone full retard with shooting itself in the foot and crying to the government why it's bleeding from the foot.

Thanks dear CGN member from 2009, 10 years and he still hasn't learned his lesson, clearly you win the you're awesome award of the day!
 
bananarama said:
CGN again has gone full retard with shooting itself in the foot and crying to the government why it's bleeding from the foot.

Thanks dear CGN member from 2009, 10 years and he still hasn't learned his lesson, clearly you win the you're awesome award of the day!
Click to expand...

All I did was post a picture that was already available on the web. Nobody had to make such a big deal of it if they thought it was a big secret.

An upper is a non registered part, thats it. Only a few manufacturers make slant cut receivers. I for one was happy because I want more options for my next upper and thought others would be to.
 
bananarama said:
CGN again has gone full retard with shooting itself in the foot and crying to the government why it's bleeding from the foot.

Thanks dear CGN member from 2009, 10 years and he still hasn't learned his lesson, clearly you win the you're awesome award of the day!
Click to expand...

Yo Mike chill out and ride your Bike.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom