costs too much to store weapons your never going to use the military budget is as we all know very limited
Does anyone recall the picture of bins of TT-33s going off to the smelter? I bet the Russians had kept them in storage.
I also think of our Canadians C1A1 FALs that got destroyed, after being all refurbed. And the nice little SMG. We could have given both to the Ukraine.
costs too much to store weapons your never going to use the military budget is as we all know very limited
Storing doesn’t cost much. You can fit 10 000 pistols in a garage. You do need to pay someone to remember where they are though.
Storing doesn’t cost much. You can fit 10 000 pistols in a garage. You do need to pay someone to remember where they are though.
I remember the Gwynne Dyer series about modern warfare in the late 80's. While Gwynne has turned out to be wrong on many levels about most things (and a bit of a closet lefty - gee, maybe that's how he got so much funding from the CBC for a series about warfare), there was a statement he made that has stuck with me ever since. "WW3 will be a 'Come as you are' war. Weapon systems have become to complex for the kind of mass production we saw in WW1 and WW2. The winner will be determined not by who can outproduce the other side, but by who already has."
I'm paraphrasing, of course, this was almost 4 decades ago that I watched that series.
Stockpiling weapons always seems like a poor use of resources. Right up until you need them.
packing them transporting them warehouse space and servicing them every few years gets expensive. that's what I was getting at
Russian tank storage was not effective. Only a very small percentage of their t55 and t62 tanks could be fielded with minimal maintenance. Most are being sent to Kazakhstan for total refurbishment before they can be used. Many of them are devoid of needed parts because of years of parts robbing to keep other tanks going and corruption to steal and recycle valuable pieces.
This is why Russia can't seem to concentrate enough armor in Ukraine despite the size of their tank force in paper.
I remember the Gwynne Dyer series about modern warfare in the late 80's. While Gwynne has turned out to be wrong on many levels about most things (and a bit of a closet lefty - gee, maybe that's how he got so much funding from the CBC for a series about warfare), there was a statement he made that has stuck with me ever since. "WW3 will be a 'Come as you are' war. Weapon systems have become to complex for the kind of mass production we saw in WW1 and WW2. The winner will be determined not by who can outproduce the other side, but by who already has."
I'm paraphrasing, of course, this was almost 4 decades ago that I watched that series.
Stockpiling weapons always seems like a poor use of resources. Right up until you need them.
If they can canibalise half their T-55 force into working kit, that will be significant. They did make 100,000 of them. They probably don't have the resources to upgrade them with ERA and Stabber though.
Punches thru class 3 body armour as well
Like an idiot I bought the 2280 round case od ammo when I bought and have a ton of it using up space in my ammo locker.
Like an idiot I bought the 2280 round case od ammo when I bought and have a ton of it using up space in my ammo locker.
I have a 1944 Tula that was pushed out rapidly from the factory, because the finish of it is kind of rough. (That’s why I bought it, I love the history). It shoots a bit to the left, but it IS a Communist pistol, lol.
I did the same. Last spring, I sold 1/2 the ammo (still in the can) for more than i paid for the pistol and ammo combined. So, you know, taking it as a win.