Tikka T1x .22lr Scope recommendations

[JQIAN]

I only just saw this, thanks!…I got an MDT 20 MOA rail from Cabelas with free shipping and the Burris XTR signature rings from Stoeger Canada on sale.

Also shout out to Jerry from Mystic Precision for the best price and service on an Athlon Midas-Tac scope!

Looking forward to assembling and testing my new toy!

I never get the hype of burris signature rings. Ring insertion is never a reliable approach to achieve the cant let alone the over priced.
Besides, MDT rail is not as good as area 419. I would rather invest on area-419 and a pair of mdt rings.

 

[waynewjw]

I don’t think it’s hype regards the Burris rings. The plastic inserts ensure that the scope isn’t misaligned and fits correctly and you don’t mark the tube. It also means you don’t need to lap your rings to ensure that they align and don’t offset the scope. Just my 2 cents on Burris rings.

 

[Alchemist]

I never get the hype of burris signature rings. Ring insertion is never a reliable approach to achieve the cant let alone the over priced.
Besides, MDT rail is not as good as area 419. I would rather invest on area-419 and a pair of mdt rings.

The rings were $149 on sale with an extra 10% off at Stoeger Canada so a pretty good discount. They had good reviews and to be honest I’m going to use them with the zero cant inserts to start with as they will be on a 20 MOA rail. The other inserts will be fun to experiment with later on. As for the rail MDT seem to put out some good stuff, I’ve never had an issue with anything I’ve bought from them and the Area 419 rail seemed to be most available in a 30 MOA which I didn’t really want.

At the end of the day if the rail doesn’t work I’ll sell it and try another. It wasn’t outrageously expensive.

 

[mmcintyre1220]

I never get the hype of burris signature rings. Ring insertion is never a reliable approach to achieve the cant let alone the over priced.
Besides, MDT rail is not as good as area 419. I would rather invest on area-419 and a pair of mdt rings.

So I bought the MDT rail and feel as though it is exceptional. What would make the area-419 rail better or what makes the MDT rail worse?

 

[Walterfisher]

So I bought the MDT rail and feel as though it is exceptional. What would make the area-419 rail better or what makes the MDT rail worse?

Realistically, there isn't any noteable difference. I have used rails from Area 419, MDT, EGW and others with no name at all from 0 - 50 moa and they all work fine. Unless the rail is warped or not machined properly, there isn't much difference except the name on the side.

 

[Rod B]

I don’t think it’s hype regards the Burris rings. The plastic inserts ensure that the scope isn’t misaligned and fits correctly and you don’t mark the tube. It also means you don’t need to lap your rings to ensure that they align and don’t offset the scope. Just my 2 cents on Burris rings.

I agree, Burris rings are usually my first choice for all the reason stated above.

 

[Boat tail]

Started with a Nikon x1000 4-16 on my mtr, but at 100 meter my aging eyes with a start of cataract ask for more power to see the .22 holes. After a lot of comparison and research, i decided to try the Delta Javelin and wow, what a nice scope, well built and clear , after one year of usage i can say i am more than satisfied with my purchase, it brought my shooting to another level, the saying buy once, cry once is right !

How did you like the Nikon when shooting close up around 20 yards.
Was it clear and parallax good

 

[OkayShooter]

I agree, Burris rings are usually my first choice for all the reason stated above.

My Tasco (8-32x44) won't zero without them. Might be a 20/25 yard scope setup. Without 15 moa inserts I cannot shoot past 50. Then don't got enough windage. The windage dial there is no +0-... Mechanical zero. It is 0 to 6..

 

[Jahnj0584]

1,131 days
December 12, 2022 - January 16, 2026

 

[Hardhammer]

How did you like the Nikon when shooting close up around 20 yards.
Was it clear and parallax good

Can’t say, never shoot less than 50 meters, but really clear glass on those nikon for the price, too bad they stop making them.
Lol, just saw the date myself…..well better now than never i guess

 

[Boat tail]

Can’t say, never shoot less than 50 meters, but really clear glass on those nikon for the price, too bad they stop making them.
Lol, just saw the date myself…..well better now than never i guess

I'm bidding on a Fs 1000 now at ward auction. It's around $350. Canadain. Not sure if that's overpriced since no more warrentee on these scopes

 

[Boat tail]

I bidding on a Fs1000 Nikon right now. 4.5 -14x 55. Bids at $330.
Not sure if I should bid $350. As there is no viewing on them so don't know if the lenses are good still. If it had warrentee I would go i higher just don't like paying 20% on top of bid either.

 

[Homesteader]

Lots of good input on target scopes for you. I'd hate hunting with them though, so much weight and bulk for that little 22. I'd look at a rail or high end detachable mounts and run two scopes. Fixed 4x or 2-7x for hunting with a 32mm objective is ideal in my mind for hunting. Leupold does a 3-9 rimfire which could run double duty but is a compromise for sure. Better yet get an actual heavy barrel 22 for long range which in my mind is 100-300yds for a 22, and keep the t1x set up for field use

........grab the 1907 on the EE right now

 

[Boat tail]

A scope ideal for long range target shooting will be less than ideal for small game hunting. Too much magnification, parallax adjustment are all a pita for small game hunting where you may shoot from as close as 5 yards and perhaps 75 or 125 yards. For that, I prefer a simple 3-9x without parallax adjustment. Just point and shoot, using a little estimated holdover where necessary.

I'm not saying don't buy a 6-24x50 parallax adjustable scope, just that it will not be ideal for both uses.

Could you not lower the fixed parallax setting on a side parallax scope ,where it only goes down to 75 yards on the knob and reset the front parallax lense down to 25 yards

 

[horseman2]

Target shooting and hunting is going to be a bit of a compromise, Something like a Bushnell 6500 2-16 with a side focus/paralax adjustment would fit the bill and appear from time to time reasonably priced on the E.E.

There is a marked difference between hunting and targets versus target shooting and hunting.
Hunting scopes require the ability to sight the rifle in on targets.
Many people buying a target scope will find it unsuitable for hunting.
Be Aware of the Cblaea's employee telling you "This is what you need". It will be a target scope not suitable for hunting and useless in low light situations!

 

[Rod B]

There is a marked difference between hunting and targets versus target shooting and hunting.
Hunting scopes require the ability to sight the rifle in on targets.
Many people buying a target scope will find it unsuitable for hunting.
Be Aware of the Cblaea's employee telling you "This is what you need". It will be a target scope not suitable for hunting and useless in low light situations!

In my opinion the average Cabela employee knows "Jack Sh!t".

 

[Can-down]

There is a marked difference between hunting and targets versus target shooting and hunting.
Hunting scopes require the ability to sight the rifle in on targets.
Many people buying a target scope will find it unsuitable for hunting.
Be Aware of the Cblaea's employee telling you "This is what you need". It will be a target scope not suitable for hunting and useless in low light situations!

Probably better to ask advice here rather then Cabella's for sure.
Target scopes also require the ability to sight the rifle in on targets.... it's one of the things that crosses over well with both hunting and target shooting.... same with good glass. Good glass works better in both cases as well.

While I get most of what your saying about the differences between hunting and target shooting (hence the need for compromise), another factor is the type of hunting a person is doing. I'm sure many people shoot gophers off a rest using target oriented scopes and do just fine... that same heavy large scope with lots of magnification might be less appealing to someone stalking large game in the bush or mountains.

Reticles are a bit of a personal thing but most of us can agree that a basic reticle with maybe a few hold over points is better for most hunting situations then a tactical style with a Christmas tree..... though a gopher hunter might like the christmas tree shooting in windy conditions and different ranges on a dusty field.

There are a lot of reasonably priced options today for good glass, illumination ,side adjustable parallax and all sorts of reticles that's for sure.